Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Hecht, Cedric; Eisen, Olaf: Snow density profiles from Neumayer station [dataset bundled publication]. PANGAEA, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963323 (dataset in review)

Show MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
This is a collection of shallow snow density data sets from research station Neumayer II, Neumayer III and the Kottas traverse between Neumayer, Kottas camp and Kohnen station. The original snow density data are available as Excel and txt files and as density-depth profiles in png format. The data were collected between 2001 and 2021. Measurements in 2019, (2020) and 2021 were taken on a monthly basis. Before this period, sampling took place on a rather irregular basis, but often once a year, at Neumayer station in most cases by members of the overwintering team, lead by the overwinterer for the air chemistry observatory (SPUSO). Sampling during the Kottas traverse was carried out by members of the traverse personnel. The sampling devices used were • conventional steal cylinders with a length of about 20 cm and an inner diameter of 6 cm and a wall thickness of 1 mm; the exact measurements were recorded in the protocols. Due to damage by ice layers the cylinders often have to be sharpened again and therefore become shorter over time ( (method listed in sensor.awi.de as awi_snow_sampler_3). • single-tube carbon fibre liners, as described in Schaller et al. (2016) with a length of 1 m and an inner diameter of around 10 cm and a wall thickness of 1 mm (method listed in sensor.awi.de as awi_snow_sampler_2); • dual-tube carbon liner probing system developed by Dallmayr et al. (2020) (method listed in sensor.awi.de as awi_snow_sampler_1). More details about sampling event nomenclature is provided below in the file description. For the steal cylinder sampling method, sample density was determined for individual depth sections, thus providing a stratigraphic density profile. For both liner methods, density was determined as the bulk density, i.e. the average density of the whole snow core sampled with the carbon liner tube. If it was possible to remove the snow core in a mostly intact way from the liner, it was cut into samples in a aluminium tray, as described in Schaller et al. (2016). This also eventually provides a density profile. Sample depth vary, as thick ice layers often inhibit deeper penetration with either method. In some cases, the carbon liner was damaged, resulting in a non-cylindrical form of the snow sample. Such events were noted in the protocols and an attempt made to correct the density accordingly. A description of the density data sets' is provided in the MSc thesis by Cedric Hecht under supervision of Olaf Eisen.
Keyword(s):
Dronning Maud Land; Neumayer Station; snow accumulation; snow cores; snow density; snow pit
References:
Dallmayr, Remi; Freitag, Johannes; Hörhold, Maria; Laepple, Thomas; Lemburg, Johannes; Della-Lunga, Damiano; Wilhelms, Frank (2021): A dual-tube sampling technique for snowpack studies. Journal of Glaciology, 67(261), 84-90, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.85
Schaller, Christoph Florian; Freitag, Johannes; Kipfstuhl, Sepp; Laepple, Thomas; Steen-Larsen, Hans Christian; Eisen, Olaf (2016): A representative density profile of the North Greenland snowpack. The Cryosphere, 10(5), 1991-2002, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1991-2016
Additional metadata:
Collection of original density profile protocols including additional details in German language (2023). Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, DensityProfiles_Neumayer_raw-protocols.zip
Coverage:
Median Latitude: -70.836153 * Median Longitude: -8.299704 * South-bound Latitude: -75.004930 * West-bound Longitude: -9.680100 * North-bound Latitude: -70.654910 * East-bound Longitude: -4.216300
Date/Time Start: 2001-12-30T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2021-10-31T00:00:00
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-4.0) (License comes into effect after moratorium ends)
Size:
22 datasets

Download Data (login required; moratorium until 2024-09-30)

Download ZIP file containing all datasets as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

Datasets listed in this bundled publication

  1. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Kottaspegel traverse in 2018. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963332
  2. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at hot water drilling hole EIS1 in 2018. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963372
  3. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at hot water drilling hole EIS2 in 2018. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963373
  4. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Neumayer Station II in 2001. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963340
  5. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Neumayer Station II in 2002. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963352
  6. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Neumayer Station II in 2004. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963353
  7. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Neumayer Station II in 2006. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963354
  8. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Neumayer Station II in 2007. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963355
  9. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Neumayer Station II in 2008. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963356
  10. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2002. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963360
  11. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2003. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963361
  12. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2005. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963362
  13. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2006. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963363
  14. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2008. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963364
  15. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2009. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963365
  16. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2010. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963366
  17. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2011. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963367
  18. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2012. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963368
  19. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at Pegelfeld Sued in 2019. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963369
  20. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at air chemistry observatory (Spuso) at Neumayer Station III in 2019. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963370
  21. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at air chemistry observatory (Spuso) at Neumayer Station III in 2020. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.965881
  22. Hecht, C; Eisen, O (in review): Snow density profiles at air chemistry observatory (Spuso) at Neumayer Station III in 2021. https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.963371