Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Grüger, Eberhard; Schlütz, Frank; Henrich, Wilhelm Alfred (2003): Age determination of sediment core Trentelmoor [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.848666, In supplement to: Grüger, E et al. (2003): Vegetations- und siedlungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen am Trentelmoor bei Peine. Beiträge zur Naturkunde Niedersachsens, 56, 175-192, hdl:10013/epic.45919.d001

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Coverage:
Latitude: 52.343500 * Longitude: 10.228600
Date/Time Start: 2000-05-15T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2000-07-15T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.4025 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 5.4700 m
Event(s):
Trentelmoor * Latitude: 52.343500 * Longitude: 10.228600 * Date/Time Start: 2000-05-15T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2000-07-15T00:00:00 * Elevation: 62.0 m * Location: Peine, Lower Saxony, Northern Germany * Method/Device: Peat corer (PEATC) * Comment: Devices: Russian peat corer (0-2.0 m), Merkt/Streif piston corer (2.0-8.99 m). Stratigraphy: 0-1.4 m Brown moss peat, 1.4-8.9 m detritus gyttja
Comment:
Conventional datings: Helmut Erlenkeuser
AMS datings: Pieter M. Grootes
Calibrated age ranges were calculated from the unrounded values (not shown) of the conventional 14C years. Calibration: CALIB REV7.1 with calib data set intcal13.14c, Reimer et al. 2013 Radiocarbon 55(4), doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947
Comment on the AMS-Dates (from the written communication with P.M. Grootes, 2002-07-16):
KIA16235: The humic acid fraction is about 290 ± 54 years (~5.5 sigma) younger and a seed found in the sample even 405 ± 50 years (~9.5 sigma) younger than the leaching residue. This implies that the dated sediment (detritus gyttja) is probably a mixture of material of different ages.
KIA16236: The ages of the leaching residue and of the humic acid fraction do not differ significantly. A piece of charcoal, however, found in the dated material turned out to be about 859 ± 53 years (16.25 sigma) older than the sediment indicating an admixture of older organic material.
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1Sample, optional label/labor noLab noGrüger, Eberhard
2DEPTH, sediment/rockDepth sedmGrüger, EberhardGeocode – calculated from top and bottom
3Depth, top/minDepth topmGrüger, Eberhard
4Depth, bottom/maxDepth botmGrüger, Eberhard
5Age, dated materialDated materialGrüger, Eberhard
6Analytical methodMethodGrüger, Eberhard
7Age, datedAge datedka BPGrüger, EberhardBP = 1950
8Age, dated standard deviationAge dated std dev±Grüger, Eberhard
9δ13Cδ13C‰ PDBGrüger, Eberhard
10δ13C, standard deviationδ13C std dev±Grüger, Eberhard
11Age, commentCommGrüger, Eberhard±1 sigma P=68.3 %; ±2 sigma P=95.4 %
12Age, maximum/oldAge maxkaGrüger, Eberhard
13Age, minimum/youngAge minkaGrüger, Eberhard
14ProbabilityProb%Grüger, Eberhard
Size:
309 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML