Grüger, Eberhard; Schlütz, Frank; Henrich, Wilhelm Alfred (2003): Age determination of sediment core Trentelmoor [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.848666, In supplement to: Grüger, E et al. (2003): Vegetations- und siedlungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen am Trentelmoor bei Peine. Beiträge zur Naturkunde Niedersachsens, 56, 175-192, hdl:10013/epic.45919.d001
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Other version:
Radiocarbon datings of sediment core Trentelmoor, Peine, Lower Saxony, Germany (original table as PDF). hdl:10013/epic.45905.d001
Coverage:
Latitude: 52.343500 * Longitude: 10.228600
Date/Time Start: 2000-05-15T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2000-07-15T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.4025 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 5.4700 m
Event(s):
Trentelmoor * Latitude: 52.343500 * Longitude: 10.228600 * Date/Time Start: 2000-05-15T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2000-07-15T00:00:00 * Elevation: 62.0 m * Location: Peine, Lower Saxony, Northern Germany * Method/Device: Peat corer (PEATC) * Comment: Devices: Russian peat corer (0-2.0 m), Merkt/Streif piston corer (2.0-8.99 m). Stratigraphy: 0-1.4 m Brown moss peat, 1.4-8.9 m detritus gyttja
Comment:
Conventional datings: Helmut Erlenkeuser
AMS datings: Pieter M. Grootes
Calibrated age ranges were calculated from the unrounded values (not shown) of the conventional 14C years. Calibration: CALIB REV7.1 with calib data set intcal13.14c, Reimer et al. 2013 Radiocarbon 55(4), doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947
Comment on the AMS-Dates (from the written communication with P.M. Grootes, 2002-07-16):
KIA16235: The humic acid fraction is about 290 ± 54 years (~5.5 sigma) younger and a seed found in the sample even 405 ± 50 years (~9.5 sigma) younger than the leaching residue. This implies that the dated sediment (detritus gyttja) is probably a mixture of material of different ages.
KIA16236: The ages of the leaching residue and of the humic acid fraction do not differ significantly. A piece of charcoal, however, found in the dated material turned out to be about 859 ± 53 years (16.25 sigma) older than the sediment indicating an admixture of older organic material.
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sample, optional label/labor no | Lab no | Grüger, Eberhard | |||
| 2 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Grüger, Eberhard | Geocode – calculated from top and bottom | |
| 3 | Depth, top/min | Depth top | m | Grüger, Eberhard | ||
| 4 | Depth, bottom/max | Depth bot | m | Grüger, Eberhard | ||
| 5 | Age, dated material | Dated material | Grüger, Eberhard | |||
| 6 | Analytical method | Method | Grüger, Eberhard | |||
| 7 | Age, dated | Age dated | ka BP | Grüger, Eberhard | BP = 1950 | |
| 8 | Age, dated standard deviation | Age dated std dev | ± | Grüger, Eberhard | ||
| 9 | δ13C | δ13C | ‰ PDB | Grüger, Eberhard | ||
| 10 | δ13C, standard deviation | δ13C std dev | ± | Grüger, Eberhard | ||
| 11 | Age, comment | Comm | Grüger, Eberhard | ±1 sigma P=68.3 %; ±2 sigma P=95.4 % | ||
| 12 | Age, maximum/old | Age max | ka | Grüger, Eberhard | ||
| 13 | Age, minimum/young | Age min | ka | Grüger, Eberhard | ||
| 14 | Probability | Prob | % | Grüger, Eberhard |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
309 data points