Not logged in
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Carter, Robert M; Gammon, Paul; Millwood, L (2004): (Table 2) Control Points and sedimentation rates for the ODP Site 181-1119 age model. PANGAEA,, In supplement to: Carter, RM et al. (2004): Glacial-interglacial (MIS 1-10) migrations of the Subtropical Front across ODP Site 1119, Canterbury Bight, Southwest Pacific Ocean. Marine Geology, 205(1-4), 29-58,

Always quote above citation when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Latitude: -44.755533 * Longitude: 172.393383
Date/Time Start: 1998-08-05T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1998-08-26T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 100.10 m
181-1119 * Latitude: -44.755533 * Longitude: 172.393383 * Date/Time Start: 1998-08-05T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1998-08-26T00:00:00 * Elevation: -396.2 m * Penetration: 656.6 m * Recovery: 612.8 m * Location: South Pacific Ocean * Campaign: Leg181 * Basis: Joides Resolution * Method/Device: Composite Core (COMPCORE) * Comment: 70 cores; 656.6 m cored; 0 m drilled; 93.3% recovery
Depth is composite depth (mcd) from Weedon and Harris, in: Carter et al, 1999, doi:10.2973/, 0.45 mcd and 47.58 mcd Diasten, 86.62 mcd unconformity. The model is based upon radiocarbon age control down to ~39 ka (18.67 mcd), and prior to that by matching individualistic features of the climatic record between the 1119 onboard MST natural Q radiation curve (a proxy for mud delivery to the site) and the deuterium record from the Vostok ice core (a proxy for Antarctic air temperature; Petit et al.,1999, doi:10.1038/20859 ), using the Vostok time scale tuned to insolation at 65°N by Shackleton (2000, doi:10.1126/science.289.5486.1897). To reduce arbitrary changes in sedimentation rate, a linear age model was fitted to the six AMS dates between 2.07 and 14.95 (age=13700+710*mcd; R2 =0.96). Because of the marine reservoir correction uncertainties, the radiocarbon-controlled part of the age model is provisional. Age errors up to +/-1 kyr are possible back to ~25 ka, and up to +/-3 kyr between 25 and 40 ka.
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1DEPTH, sediment/rockDepthmGeocode
2Age, commentCommCarter, Robert MControl (cal14C ka)
3Age modelAge modelkaCarter, Robert M
4Sedimentation rateSed ratecm/kaCarter, Robert M
5CommentCommentCarter, Robert MCorrelation
96 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text (use the following character encoding: )

View dataset as HTML