Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Carter, Robert M; Gammon, Paul; Millwood, L (2004): (Table 2) Control Points and sedimentation rates for the ODP Site 181-1119 age model [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.705254, In supplement to: Carter, RM et al. (2004): Glacial-interglacial (MIS 1-10) migrations of the Subtropical Front across ODP Site 1119, Canterbury Bight, Southwest Pacific Ocean. Marine Geology, 205(1-4), 29-58, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(04)00017-9

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Project(s):
Coverage:
Latitude: -44.755533 * Longitude: 172.393383
Date/Time Start: 1998-08-05T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1998-08-26T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 100.10 m
Event(s):
181-1119 * Latitude: -44.755533 * Longitude: 172.393383 * Date/Time Start: 1998-08-05T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1998-08-26T00:00:00 * Elevation: -396.2 m * Penetration: 656.6 m * Recovery: 612.8 m * Location: South Pacific Ocean * Campaign: Leg181 * Basis: Joides Resolution * Method/Device: Composite Core (COMPCORE) * Comment: 70 cores; 656.6 m cored; 0 m drilled; 93.3% recovery
Comment:
Depth is composite depth (mcd) from Weedon and Harris, in: Carter et al, 1999, doi:10.2973/odp.proc.ir.181.2000, 0.45 mcd and 47.58 mcd Diasten, 86.62 mcd unconformity. The model is based upon radiocarbon age control down to ~39 ka (18.67 mcd), and prior to that by matching individualistic features of the climatic record between the 1119 onboard MST natural Q radiation curve (a proxy for mud delivery to the site) and the deuterium record from the Vostok ice core (a proxy for Antarctic air temperature; Petit et al.,1999, doi:10.1038/20859 ), using the Vostok time scale tuned to insolation at 65°N by Shackleton (2000, doi:10.1126/science.289.5486.1897). To reduce arbitrary changes in sedimentation rate, a linear age model was fitted to the six AMS dates between 2.07 and 14.95 (age=13700+710*mcd; R2 =0.96). Because of the marine reservoir correction uncertainties, the radiocarbon-controlled part of the age model is provisional. Age errors up to +/-1 kyr are possible back to ~25 ka, and up to +/-3 kyr between 25 and 40 ka.
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
DEPTH, sediment/rockDepth sedmGeocode
Age, commentCommCarter, Robert MControl (cal14C ka)
Age modelAge modelkaCarter, Robert M
Sedimentation rateSRcm/kaCarter, Robert M
CommentCommentCarter, Robert MCorrelation
Size:
96 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:


Depth sed [m]

Comm

Age model [ka]

SR [cm/ka]

Comment
0.00seabed0.0005Assumed
0.45estimate9.000Estimate after Herzer (1981 )
0.46estimate11.97555Estimate on sedimentation rate between 0.46 and 0.6 mcd
0.6012.2312.23055Individual AMS date
2.0715.2115.157141Fitted AMS date
3.8416.8416.419141Fitted AMS date
5.0416.8217.278141Fitted AMS date
6.3117.4118.180141Fitted AMS date
11.0422.7221.531141Fitted AMS date
14.5923.4324.05927Fitted AMS date
18.6739.3339.33033Individual AMS date
42.78Vostok113.00025MIS 5.1-4 boundary
47.58Vostok132.000Near base of MIS 5.5
47.59Vostok135.00020Assumed MIS 6-5 diastem of 3 ky
50.78Vostok151.00069Near 6.4-6.3 boundary
75.82Vostok187.50022MIS 7-6 boundary
78.37Vostok199.00017MIS 7.1 peak
82.03Vostok220.00014MIS 7.3 peak
86.62Vostok252.000In top of MIS 8.2
86.63Vostok277.00010MIS 8.5-8.4 boundary
88.82Vostok300.00010MIS 9-8 boundary
92.42Vostok335.00045MIS 9.3 peak
96.43Vostok344.00014Top MIS-10.2
98.57Vostok359.50014MIS 10.4 centre
100.10Vostok370.000Top of MIS 11