Citation:

PANGAEA.231103

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Weaver, Barry L; Rideout, M L; Neuser, R D; Khan, Mohammad Javed; Hill, Ian Ashley; Echols, D J; Drake, N; Curtis, Doris M; Clark, Murlene W; Christie, David M; Brannon, Joyce C; Mills, William; Bougault, Henri; Cande, Steven C (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXII, 667 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.82.1985

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: 37.770000 * Longitude: -37.343500

Date/Time Start: 1981-10-03T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1981-10-03T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.50 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 125.80 m

Event(s):

82-558A * Latitude: 37.770000 * Longitude: -37.343500 * Date/Time: 1981-10-03T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3754.0 m * Penetration: 131.5 m * Recovery: 123.4 m * Location: North Atlantic/RIDGE * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 16 cores; 131.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 93.9 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Diatoms	Diatoms	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Silicoflagellates	Silicoflag	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

520 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Nannos [%]	10 Foram [%]	11 Rad [%]	12 Diatoms [%]	13 Silicoflag [%]	14 Spiculae [%]
0.50	82-558A-1-1,50	Pleistocene	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,VOLC.GLAS 10	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	60	20	2	2	0	2
0.55	82-558A-1-1,55	Pleistocene	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS 1,CLAY 6,VOLC.GLAS 5,CARB 1	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	25	2	2	2	2
1.30	82-558A-2-1,80	Pleistocene	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 2,CLAY 1,VOLC.GLAS 2,CARB 3	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	60	20	3	2	2	5
4.30	82-558A-2-3,80	Pleistocene	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,VOLC.GLAS 1,OP.MINS 1	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	55	30	5	1	1	5
7.00	82-558A-2-5,50	Pleistocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY TR,VOLC.GLAS TR, OP.MINS TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	80	15	3	1	2	2
8.25	82-558A-2-6,25	Pleistocene	FORAMINIFERAL SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 2,VOLC.GLAS	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	65	10	5	2	3	10
9.20	82-558A-2-61,120	Pleistocene	SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 2,VOLC.GLAS TR,CARB	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	75	10	2	1	1	6
13.80	82-558A-3-3,80	Cenozoic	NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,OP.MINS TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	80	10	1	1	2	1
15.60	82-558A-3-41,110	Cenozoic	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	74	20	1	0	0	2
18.30	82-558A-3-6,80	Cenozoic	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS TR,MICRONOD 1,CARB 2	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	70	20	1	0	0	0
20.45	82-558A-4-1,95	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,OP.MINS 3	Minor lithology; relative abundance	73	15	2	0	2	0
23.30	82-558A-4-3,80	Pliocene	CLAYEY FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,OP TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	20	20	1	2	0	2
25.20	82-558A-4-41,120	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	80	10	2	0	0	1
27.80	82-558A-4-6,80	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,MICRONOD TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	70	13	8	2	2	1
27.80	82-558A-4-6,80	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,MICRONOD TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	70	13	8	2	2	1
29.92	82-558A-5-1,92	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS TR,PYR TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	98	10	5	2	2	2
30.10	82-558A-5-11,110	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS TR,OP.MINS TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	80	10	2	2	1	1
32.80	82-558A-5-3,80	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,OP.MINS TR,VOLC.GLAS TR	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	85	8	2	2	2	2
37.70	82-558A-5-61,120	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 3,VOLC.GLAS 2,PYR 7	Minor lithology; relative abundance	70	13	2	2	2	2
38.30	82-558A-5-7,30	Pliocene	CLAYEY SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 2,OP.MI	Minor lithology; relative abundance	75	7	8	1	2	1
42.30	82-558A-6-3,80	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 7,MICRONOD 1,CARB 2	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	73	15	1	1	1	1
43.80	82-558A-6-4,80	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 2,CLAY 7,MICRONOD TR,CARB 5	Minor lithology; relative abundance	78	15	0	2	0	0
45.02	82-558A-6-5,52	Pliocene	CLAYEY FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 18,MICRONOD 1,CARB 5	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	68	20	0	0	0	0
48.00	82-558A-6-7,50	Pliocene	CLAYEY FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 19,MICRONOD TR,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	50	30	0	0	0	0
51.80	82-558A-7-3,80	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 20,MICRONOD TR,CARB 2	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	65	5	0	0	0	0
52.93	82-558A-7-4,43	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 10,CARB 5	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	80	5	0	0	0	0
54.03	82-558A-7-5,3	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 3,MICRONOD 2,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	83	7	0	0	0	0
60.08	82-558A-8-21,108	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,PALAG TR,MICRONOD 1,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	89	5	0	0	0	0
61.30	82-558A-8-3,80	Pliocene	CLAYEY FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,MICRONOD 1,CARB 10	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	68	15	0	0	0	0
62.52	82-558A-8-4,52	Pliocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,OP.MINS 15	numerical abundance	83	1	0	0	0	0
70.80	82-558A-9-3,80	Pliocene	FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,PALAG TR,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	85	10	0	0	0	0
76.30	82-558A-10-2,80	Neogene	NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,PALAG TR,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	91	3	0	0	0	0
80.80	82-558A-11-3,80	Neogene	NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M FEL TR,CARB 3	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	96	1	0	0	0	0
85.30	82-558A-11-6,80	Neogene	NANNO OOZE M CARB 5	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	95	0	0	0	0	0
90.30	82-558A-12-3,80	Upper miocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CARB 2	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	94	3	0	0	0	0
99.80	82-558A-13-3,80	Upper miocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,MICRONOD TR,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	94	2	0	0	0	0
108.30	82-558A-14-4,80	Upper miocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,PALAG TR,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	95	2	0	0	0	0
109.20	82-558A-14-5,20	Upper miocene	NANNO OOZE M CLAY 15,VOLC.GLAS 3,PALAG 1,MICRONOD 3,CARB 5	Minor lithology; relative abundance	73	2	0	0	0	0
116.30	82-558A-15-3,80	Upper miocene	NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,PALAG TR,MICRONOD 1,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	90	3	0	0	0	0
125.80	82-558A-16-3,80	Upper miocene	CLAYEY NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 13,PALAG TR,MICRONOD TR,CARB 5	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	80	2	0	0	0	0