/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Bougault, Henri; Cande, Steven C (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 82-558A. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231103 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Weaver, Barry L; Rideout, M L; Neuser, R D; Khan, Mohammad Javed; Hill, Ian Ashley; Echols, D J; Drake, N; Curtis, Doris M; Clark, Murlene W; Christie, David M; Brannon, Joyce C; Mills, William; Bougault, Henri; Cande, Steven C (1985): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXII, 667 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.82.1985 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: 37.770000 * LONGITUDE: -37.343500 DATE/TIME START: 1981-10-03T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1981-10-03T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.50 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 125.80 m Event(s): 82-558A * LATITUDE: 37.770000 * LONGITUDE: -37.343500 * DATE/TIME: 1981-10-03T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -3754.0 m * Penetration: 131.5 m * Recovery: 123.4 m * LOCATION: North Atlantic/RIDGE * CAMPAIGN: Leg82 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.82.1985) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 16 cores; 131.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 93.9 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Radiolarians [%] (Rad) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Diatoms [%] (Diatoms) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silicoflagellates [%] (Silicoflag) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Spiculae [%] (Spiculae) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 520 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Nannos [%] Foram [%] Rad [%] Diatoms [%] Silicoflag [%] Spiculae [%] 0.50 82-558A-1-1,50 0 0 0 Pleistocene SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,VOLC.GLAS 10 Minor lithology; numerical abundance 60 20 2 2 0 2 0.55 82-558A-1-1,55 0 0 0 Pleistocene SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS 1,CLAY 6,VOLC.GLAS 5,CARB 1 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 50 25 2 2 2 2 1.30 82-558A-2-1,80 0 0 0 Pleistocene SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 2,CLAY 1,VOLC.GLAS 2,CARB 3 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 60 20 3 2 2 5 4.30 82-558A-2-3,80 0 0 0 Pleistocene SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,VOLC.GLAS 1,OP.MINS 1 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 55 30 5 1 1 5 7.00 82-558A-2-5,50 0 0 0 Pleistocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY TR,VOLC.GLAS TR, OP.MINS TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 80 15 3 1 2 2 8.25 82-558A-2-6,25 0 0 0 Pleistocene FORAMINIFERAL SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 2,VOLC.GLAS Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 65 10 5 2 3 10 9.20 82-558A-2-61,120 0 0 0 Pleistocene SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 2,VOLC.GLAS TR,CARB Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 75 10 2 1 1 6 13.80 82-558A-3-3,80 0 0 0 Cenozoic NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,OP.MINS TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 80 10 1 1 2 1 15.60 82-558A-3-41,110 0 0 0 Cenozoic FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 74 20 1 0 0 2 18.30 82-558A-3-6,80 0 0 0 Cenozoic FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS TR,MICRONOD 1,CARB 2 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 70 20 1 0 0 0 20.45 82-558A-4-1,95 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,OP.MINS 3 Minor lithology; relative abundance 73 15 2 0 2 0 23.30 82-558A-4-3,80 0 0 0 Pliocene CLAYEY FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,OP TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 20 20 1 2 0 2 25.20 82-558A-4-41,120 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 80 10 2 0 0 1 27.80 82-558A-4-6,80 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,MICRONOD TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 70 13 8 2 2 1 27.80 82-558A-4-6,80 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 1,MICRONOD TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 70 13 8 2 2 1 29.92 82-558A-5-1,92 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS TR,PYR TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 98 10 5 2 2 2 30.10 82-558A-5-11,110 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS TR,OP.MINS TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 80 10 2 2 1 1 32.80 82-558A-5-3,80 0 0 0 Pliocene NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,OP.MINS TR,VOLC.GLAS TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 85 8 2 2 2 2 37.70 82-558A-5-61,120 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 3,VOLC.GLAS 2,PYR 7 Minor lithology; relative abundance 70 13 2 2 2 2 38.30 82-558A-5-7,30 0 0 0 Pliocene CLAYEY SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 5,VOLC.GLAS 2,OP.MI Minor lithology; relative abundance 75 7 8 1 2 1 42.30 82-558A-6-3,80 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 7,MICRONOD 1,CARB 2 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 73 15 1 1 1 1 43.80 82-558A-6-4,80 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 2,CLAY 7,MICRONOD TR,CARB 5 Minor lithology; relative abundance 78 15 0 2 0 0 45.02 82-558A-6-5,52 0 0 0 Pliocene CLAYEY FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 18,MICRONOD 1,CARB 5 Minor lithology; numerical abundance 68 20 0 0 0 0 48.00 82-558A-6-7,50 0 0 0 Pliocene CLAYEY FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 19,MICRONOD TR,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 50 30 0 0 0 0 51.80 82-558A-7-3,80 0 0 0 Pliocene NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 20,MICRONOD TR,CARB 2 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 65 5 0 0 0 0 52.93 82-558A-7-4,43 0 0 0 Pliocene NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 10,CARB 5 Minor lithology; numerical abundance 80 5 0 0 0 0 54.03 82-558A-7-5,3 0 0 0 Pliocene NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 3,MICRONOD 2,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 83 7 0 0 0 0 60.08 82-558A-8-21,108 0 0 0 Pliocene NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,PALAG TR,MICRONOD 1,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 89 5 0 0 0 0 61.30 82-558A-8-3,80 0 0 0 Pliocene CLAYEY FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CLAY 5,MICRONOD 1,CARB 10 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 68 15 0 0 0 0 62.52 82-558A-8-4,52 0 0 0 Pliocene NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,OP.MINS 15 numerical abundance 83 1 0 0 0 0 70.80 82-558A-9-3,80 0 0 0 Pliocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,PALAG TR,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 85 10 0 0 0 0 76.30 82-558A-10-2,80 0 0 0 Neogene NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,PALAG TR,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 91 3 0 0 0 0 80.80 82-558A-11-3,80 0 0 0 Neogene NANNOFOSSIL OOZE M FEL TR,CARB 3 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 96 1 0 0 0 0 85.30 82-558A-11-6,80 0 0 0 Neogene NANNO OOZE M CARB 5 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 95 0 0 0 0 0 90.30 82-558A-12-3,80 0 0 0 Upper miocene NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,CARB 2 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 94 3 0 0 0 0 99.80 82-558A-13-3,80 0 0 0 Upper miocene NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,MICRONOD TR,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 94 2 0 0 0 0 108.30 82-558A-14-4,80 0 0 0 Upper miocene NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,PALAG TR,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 95 2 0 0 0 0 109.20 82-558A-14-5,20 0 0 0 Upper miocene NANNO OOZE M CLAY 15,VOLC.GLAS 3,PALAG 1,MICRONOD 3,CARB 5 Minor lithology; relative abundance 73 2 0 0 0 0 116.30 82-558A-15-3,80 0 0 0 Upper miocene NANNO OOZE M FEL 1,PALAG TR,MICRONOD 1,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 90 3 0 0 0 0 125.80 82-558A-16-3,80 0 0 0 Upper miocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE M FEL TR,CLAY 13,PALAG TR,MICRONOD TR,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 80 2 0 0 0 0