Roberts, David G; Schnitker, Detmar (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 81-554A [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231098
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Zimmerman, Herman; Westberg-Smith, M J; Murray, John W; Morton, Andrew C; Krumsiek, Klaus A O; Kaltenback, A J; Huddlestun, P; Homrighausen, Reiner; Desprairies, Alain; Baldauf, Jack G; Backman, Jan; Keene, John B; Roberts, David G; Schnitker, Detmar (1984): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXI, 923 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.81.1984
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 56.290000 * Longitude: -23.528200
Date/Time Start: 1981-08-27T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1981-08-27T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 77.28 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 126.68 m
Event(s):
81-554A * Latitude: 56.290000 * Longitude: -23.528200 * Date/Time: 1981-08-27T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2574.0 m * Penetration: 209 m * Recovery: 34.5 m * Location: North Atlantic/PLATEAU * Campaign: Leg81 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 14 cores; 133 m cored; 0 m drilled; 26 % recovery
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
| 3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 9 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 10 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 11 | Chalcedony | Chalcedony | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 12 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 13 | Diatoms | Diatoms | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 14 | Spiculae | Spiculae | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 15 | Minerals, other | Min other | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 16 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
236 data points
Data
| 1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Nannos [%] | 10 Foram [%] | 11 Chalcedony [%] | 12 Rad [%] | 13 Diatoms [%] | 14 Spiculae [%] | 15 Min other [%] | 16 Fe [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.28 | 81-554A-1-CC,0 | 10 | 10 | 80 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 8,VOLC.GLAS 1 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 75 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 87.70 | 81-554A-2-2,70 | 15 | 15 | 70 | Miocene | FORAM NANNO OOZE/CHALK M CLAY 10,VOLC.GLAS TR/N LIGHT,ZEOL TR | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 65 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| 98.93 | 81-554A-3-3,93 | 30 | 10 | 60 | Middle miocene | NANNO FORAM OOZE (CHALK) M QTZ 2,FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 12,LITH 2/N CLA | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 55 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 99.20 | 81-554A-3-31,120 | 25 | 10 | 65 | Middle miocene | NANNO FORAM OOZE (CHALK) M FEL TR,CLAY 9 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 60 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 100.02 | 81-554A-3-4,52 | 25 | 10 | 65 | Middle miocene | NANNO FORAM CHALK M CLAY 12,PYR 2 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 60 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 106.22 | 81-554A-4-2,22 | 35 | 30 | 35 | Middle oligocene | GLAUCONITIC NANNO FORAM CHALK M QTZ 1,CLAY 25,VOLC.GLAS TR/N PALE,GLAUC | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 40 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 108.19 | 81-554A-4-3,69 | 35 | 15 | 50 | Middle oligocene | BIOSILICEOUS FORAM MARL M CLAY 30,GLAUC 2,MICRONOD 5,CARB 3 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 20 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| 108.56 | 81-554A-4-31,106 | 40 | 10 | 50 | Middle oligocene | FORAM CHALK M CLAY 20,GLAUC 2,CARB 5 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 30 | 38 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 115.00 | 81-554A-5-11,100 | 40 | 22 | 38 | Lower oligocene | FORAM CHALK M CLAY 29,PALAG 1,GLAUC 3,ZEOL TR/N CLINOP, CARB 10,DOLO TR | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 22 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 116.59 | 81-554A-5-21,109 | 40 | 25 | 35 | Lower oligocene | GLAUCONITIC FORAM CHALK M CLAY 32,GLAUC 10,CARB 10 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 20 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 118.39 | 81-554A-5-31,139 | 50 | 15 | 35 | Upper eocene | GLAUCONITIC FORAM MARL M CLAY 30,GLAUC 15,ZEOL 1,CARB 4 | Minor lithology; numerical abundance | 20 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 120.25 | 81-554A-5-CC,0 | 50 | 20 | 30 | Lower eocene | ZEOLITIC (MARLSTONE) M CLAY 15,PALAG 15,GLAUC 5,ZEOL 10,CARB 20 | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 5 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 124.05 | 81-554A-6-1,55 | 60 | 20 | 20 | CALCAREOUS ZEOLITIC TUFF M CLAY 15,PALAG 60/N GREENISH CLAY,ZEOL 10, CAR | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 125.70 | 81-554A-6-2,70 | 60 | 10 | 30 | TUFFACEOUS MARLSTONE M CLAY 24,VOLC.GLAS 3,PALAG 25,ZEOL 3,CARB 40 | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 126.23 | 81-554A-6-21,123 | 35 | 25 | 40 | ZEOLITIC PALAGONITE TUFF M CLAY 25,VOLC.GLAS 6/N DK,PALAG 55,ZEOL 10, CA | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 126.68 | 81-554A-6-3,18 | 0 | 90 | 10 | RECRYSTALLIZED CARB (CALCITE) CEMENT M ZEOL 5,CARB 95 | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |