/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Roberts, David G; Schnitker, Detmar (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 81-554A. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231098 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Zimmerman, Herman; Westberg-Smith, M J; Murray, John W; Morton, Andrew C; Krumsiek, Klaus A O; Kaltenback, A J; Huddlestun, P; Homrighausen, Reiner; Desprairies, Alain; Baldauf, Jack G; Backman, Jan; Keene, John B; Roberts, David G; Schnitker, Detmar (1984): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, LXXXI, 923 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.81.1984 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: 56.290000 * LONGITUDE: -23.528200 DATE/TIME START: 1981-08-27T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1981-08-27T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 77.28 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 126.68 m Event(s): 81-554A * LATITUDE: 56.290000 * LONGITUDE: -23.528200 * DATE/TIME: 1981-08-27T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -2574.0 m * Penetration: 209 m * Recovery: 34.5 m * LOCATION: North Atlantic/PLATEAU * CAMPAIGN: Leg81 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.81.1984) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 14 cores; 133 m cored; 0 m drilled; 26 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Chalcedony [%] (Chalcedony) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Radiolarians [%] (Rad) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Diatoms [%] (Diatoms) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Spiculae [%] (Spiculae) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Minerals, other [%] (Min other) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Iron [%] (Fe) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 236 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Nannos [%] Foram [%] Chalcedony [%] Rad [%] Diatoms [%] Spiculae [%] Min other [%] Fe [%] 77.28 81-554A-1-CC,0 10 10 80 Upper miocene FORAM NANNO OOZE M CLAY 8,VOLC.GLAS 1 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 75 15 0 2 0 1 0 2 87.70 81-554A-2-2,70 15 15 70 Miocene FORAM NANNO OOZE/CHALK M CLAY 10,VOLC.GLAS TR/N LIGHT,ZEOL TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 65 20 0 1 2 4 0 2 98.93 81-554A-3-3,93 30 10 60 Middle miocene NANNO FORAM OOZE (CHALK) M QTZ 2,FEL TR,HVY.MINS TR,CLAY 12,LITH 2/N CLA Dominat lithology; relative abundance 55 25 0 2 0 4 0 0 99.20 81-554A-3-31,120 25 10 65 Middle miocene NANNO FORAM OOZE (CHALK) M FEL TR,CLAY 9 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 60 30 0 0 0 1 0 2 100.02 81-554A-3-4,52 25 10 65 Middle miocene NANNO FORAM CHALK M CLAY 12,PYR 2 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 60 25 0 2 0 1 0 0 106.22 81-554A-4-2,22 35 30 35 Middle oligocene GLAUCONITIC NANNO FORAM CHALK M QTZ 1,CLAY 25,VOLC.GLAS TR/N PALE,GLAUC Dominat lithology; relative abundance 40 13 0 2 0 5 0 2 108.19 81-554A-4-3,69 35 15 50 Middle oligocene BIOSILICEOUS FORAM MARL M CLAY 30,GLAUC 2,MICRONOD 5,CARB 3 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 20 30 0 2 0 8 0 2 108.56 81-554A-4-31,106 40 10 50 Middle oligocene FORAM CHALK M CLAY 20,GLAUC 2,CARB 5 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 30 38 0 2 0 5 0 2 115.00 81-554A-5-11,100 40 22 38 Lower oligocene FORAM CHALK M CLAY 29,PALAG 1,GLAUC 3,ZEOL TR/N CLINOP, CARB 10,DOLO TR Dominat lithology; relative abundance 22 35 0 0 0 2 0 2 116.59 81-554A-5-21,109 40 25 35 Lower oligocene GLAUCONITIC FORAM CHALK M CLAY 32,GLAUC 10,CARB 10 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 20 30 0 0 0 2 0 0 118.39 81-554A-5-31,139 50 15 35 Upper eocene GLAUCONITIC FORAM MARL M CLAY 30,GLAUC 15,ZEOL 1,CARB 4 Minor lithology; numerical abundance 20 30 0 0 0 1 0 0 120.25 81-554A-5-CC,0 50 20 30 Lower eocene ZEOLITIC (MARLSTONE) M CLAY 15,PALAG 15,GLAUC 5,ZEOL 10,CARB 20 Dominat lithology; relative abundance 5 30 0 0 0 2 0 0 124.05 81-554A-6-1,55 60 20 20 CALCAREOUS ZEOLITIC TUFF M CLAY 15,PALAG 60/N GREENISH CLAY,ZEOL 10, CAR Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125.70 81-554A-6-2,70 60 10 30 TUFFACEOUS MARLSTONE M CLAY 24,VOLC.GLAS 3,PALAG 25,ZEOL 3,CARB 40 Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126.23 81-554A-6-21,123 35 25 40 ZEOLITIC PALAGONITE TUFF M CLAY 25,VOLC.GLAS 6/N DK,PALAG 55,ZEOL 10, CA Dominat lithology; relative abundance 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 126.68 81-554A-6-3,18 0 90 10 RECRYSTALLIZED CARB (CALCITE) CEMENT M ZEOL 5,CARB 95 Minor lithology; relative abundance 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0