Citation:

PANGAEA.230567

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Perch-Nielsen, Katharina; Ovenshine, A Thomas; Margolis, Stanley V; Jenkins, D Graham; Hampton, Monty A; Hajos, Marta; Gostin, Victor A; Edwards, Anthony R; Andrews, Peter B; Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXIX, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.29.1975

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -40.508000 * Longitude: 167.680200

Date/Time Start: 1973-04-15T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-04-15T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.37 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 207.66 m

Event(s):

29-284 * Latitude: -40.508000 * Longitude: 167.680200 * Date/Time: 1973-04-15T00:00:00 * Elevation: -1066.0 m * Penetration: 208 m * Recovery: 166.8 m * Location: Antarctic Ocean/Tasman Sea/PLATEAU * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 19 cores; 179 m cored; 28.5 m drilled; 93.2 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Stratigraphy	Stratigraphy		Smear slide analysis
7	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
8	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
9	Carbonates	Carb	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Nannofossils	Nannos	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Calcareous spicules	Calc spic	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Components indeterminata	Comp indet	%	Smear slide analysis	other fossils
14	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Mica	Mica	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Glauconite	Glt	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
19	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
20	Heavy minerals	HM	%	Smear slide analysis
21	Minerals	Minerals	%	Smear slide analysis	isotropic minerals
22	Terrigenous	Terr	%	Smear slide analysis	terrigeneous detritus
23	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

704 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	6 Stratigraphy	7 Lithology	8 Comment	9 Carb [%]	10 Nannos [%]	11 Foram [%]	12 Calc spic [%]	13 Comp indet [%]	14 Spiculae [%]	15 Qz [%]	16 Mica [%]	17 Glt [%]	18 Opaque [%]	19 Py [%]	20 HM [%]	21 Minerals [%]	22 Terr [%]	23 Micronod [%]
0.37	29-284-1-1,37	Upper pleistocene	COARSE FRACTION	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	70	0	30	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0
1.30	29-284-1-11,130	Upper pleistocene	NANNO OSTRACOD FRAGMENT FORAM OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	30	35	0	35	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
2.61	29-284-1-21,111	Upper pleistocene	OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	45	35	0	20	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0
7.80	29-284-1-6,30	Upper pleistocene	FORAM- AND OSTRACOD- BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	86	8	0	5	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
8.60	29-284-2-CC,0	Upper pleistocene	FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	92	0	8	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
9.10	29-284-1-CC,0	Upper pleistocene	FORAM-RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	85	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
19.31	29-284-3-11,131	Upper pleistocene	OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	45	35	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	20	0	0
25.60	29-284-3-CC,0	Lower pleistocene	FORAM-RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	85	10	0	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
37.80	29-284-5-1,80	Upper pliocene	OSTRACOD FRAGMENT AND FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	55	25	2	20	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
45.10	29-284-5-6,60	Upper pliocene	OSTRACOD FRAGMENT RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	45	35	0	20	0	0	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
46.10	29-284-5-CC,0	Upper pliocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	92	5	0	2	0	0	1	0	0	2	0	0	2	0
49.00	29-284-6-21,100	Upper pliocene	OSTRACOD FRAGMENT FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	35	35	0	30	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
50.91	29-284-6-31,141	Upper pliocene	OSTRACOD FRAGMENT AND FORAM-RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	50	25	2	25	0	0	2	0	2	0	2	0	0	0
52.60	29-284-6-CC,0	Upper pliocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	94	5	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
56.74	29-284-7-1,44	Upper pliocene	MICRONODULE-BEARING FORAM AND OSTRACOD RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	54	20	0	25	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	3
65.40	29-284-7-CC,0	Upper pliocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	83	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
65.60	29-284-8-CC,0	Upper pliocene	OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	52	35	0	15	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0
76.00	29-284-9-1,90	Lower pliocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	67	20	0	25	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
84.20	29-284-9-CC,0	Lower pliocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	87	7	0	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
93.60	29-284-10-CC,0	Lower pliocene	OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	50	30	0	20	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
103.10	29-284-11-CC,0	Lower pliocene	FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	95	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
112.80	29-284-12-CC,0	Lower pliocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
122.10	29-284-13-CC,0	Lower pliocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	94	4	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
132.10	29-284-14-CC,0	Lower pliocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	82	10	0	8	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
141.40	29-284-15-CC,0	Lower pliocene	FORAM-BEARING OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	67	10	0	25	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	2
150.83	29-284-16-CC,0	Upper miocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	90	5	0	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
160.60	29-284-17-CC,0	Upper miocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	91	5	0	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
170.00	29-284-18-CC,0	Upper miocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD RICH NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	77	10	0	15	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
179.40	29-284-19-CC,0	Upper miocene	FORAM AND OSTRACOD BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	92	5	0	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
189.10	29-284-20-CC,0	Upper miocene	FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	96	3	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
198.10	29-284-21-CC,0	Upper miocene	OSTRACOD FRAGMENT AND FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	82	10	0	10	0	0	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
207.66	29-284-22-CC,0	Upper miocene	NANNO OOZE	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	98	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2