/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 29-284. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230567 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Perch-Nielsen, Katharina; Ovenshine, A Thomas; Margolis, Stanley V; Jenkins, D Graham; Hampton, Monty A; Hajos, Marta; Gostin, Victor A; Edwards, Anthony R; Andrews, Peter B; Kennett, James P; Houtz, Robert E (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXIX, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.29.1975 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: -40.508000 * LONGITUDE: 167.680200 DATE/TIME START: 1973-04-15T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1973-04-15T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.37 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 207.66 m Event(s): 29-284 * LATITUDE: -40.508000 * LONGITUDE: 167.680200 * DATE/TIME: 1973-04-15T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -1066.0 m * Penetration: 208 m * Recovery: 166.8 m * LOCATION: Antarctic Ocean/Tasman Sea/PLATEAU * CAMPAIGN: Leg29 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.29.1975) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 19 cores; 179 m cored; 28.5 m drilled; 93.2 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Carbonates [%] (Carb) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Calcareous spicules [%] (Calc spic) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Components indeterminata [%] (Comp indet) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis * COMMENT: other fossils Spiculae [%] (Spiculae) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Quartz [%] (Qz) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Mica [%] (Mica) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Glauconite [%] (Glt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Opaque minerals [%] (Opaque) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Pyrite, FeS2 [%] (Py) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Heavy minerals [%] (HM) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Minerals [%] (Minerals) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis * COMMENT: isotropic minerals Terrigenous [%] (Terr) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis * COMMENT: terrigeneous detritus Micronodules [%] (Micronod) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 704 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Carb [%] Nannos [%] Foram [%] Calc spic [%] Comp indet [%] Spiculae [%] Qz [%] Mica [%] Glt [%] Opaque [%] Py [%] HM [%] Minerals [%] Terr [%] Micronod [%] 0.37 29-284-1-1,37 0 0 0 Upper pleistocene COARSE FRACTION Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 0 70 0 30 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.30 29-284-1-11,130 0 0 0 Upper pleistocene NANNO OSTRACOD FRAGMENT FORAM OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 30 35 0 35 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.61 29-284-1-21,111 0 0 0 Upper pleistocene OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 45 35 0 20 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 7.80 29-284-1-6,30 0 0 0 Upper pleistocene FORAM- AND OSTRACOD- BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 86 8 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8.60 29-284-2-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper pleistocene FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 92 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.10 29-284-1-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper pleistocene FORAM-RICH NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 85 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.31 29-284-3-11,131 0 0 0 Upper pleistocene OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 45 35 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20 0 0 25.60 29-284-3-CC,0 0 0 0 Lower pleistocene FORAM-RICH NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 85 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 37.80 29-284-5-1,80 0 0 0 Upper pliocene OSTRACOD FRAGMENT AND FORAM RICH NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 55 25 2 20 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45.10 29-284-5-6,60 0 0 0 Upper pliocene OSTRACOD FRAGMENT RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 45 35 0 20 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 46.10 29-284-5-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper pliocene FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 92 5 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 49.00 29-284-6-21,100 0 0 0 Upper pliocene OSTRACOD FRAGMENT FORAM NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 35 35 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.91 29-284-6-31,141 0 0 0 Upper pliocene OSTRACOD FRAGMENT AND FORAM-RICH NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 50 25 2 25 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 52.60 29-284-6-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper pliocene FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 94 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56.74 29-284-7-1,44 0 0 0 Upper pliocene MICRONODULE-BEARING FORAM AND OSTRACOD RICH NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 54 20 0 25 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 65.40 29-284-7-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper pliocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 83 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 65.60 29-284-8-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper pliocene OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 52 35 0 15 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 76.00 29-284-9-1,90 0 0 0 Lower pliocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 67 20 0 25 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 84.20 29-284-9-CC,0 0 0 0 Lower pliocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 87 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93.60 29-284-10-CC,0 0 0 0 Lower pliocene OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH FORAM NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 50 30 0 20 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 103.10 29-284-11-CC,0 0 0 0 Lower pliocene FORAM-BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 95 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112.80 29-284-12-CC,0 0 0 0 Lower pliocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122.10 29-284-13-CC,0 0 0 0 Lower pliocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 94 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132.10 29-284-14-CC,0 0 0 0 Lower pliocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD-BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 82 10 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141.40 29-284-15-CC,0 0 0 0 Lower pliocene FORAM-BEARING OSTRACOD FRAGMENT-RICH NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 67 10 0 25 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 150.83 29-284-16-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper miocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 90 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160.60 29-284-17-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper miocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 91 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170.00 29-284-18-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper miocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD RICH NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 77 10 0 15 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 179.40 29-284-19-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper miocene FORAM AND OSTRACOD BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 92 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 189.10 29-284-20-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper miocene FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 2 96 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 198.10 29-284-21-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper miocene OSTRACOD FRAGMENT AND FORAM BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 82 10 0 10 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 207.66 29-284-22-CC,0 0 0 0 Upper miocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2