Anonymous (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 1-2 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230303
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Pessagno, E A; Fischer, A G; Burk, Creighton A; Bukry, David; Berggren, William A; Beall, A O; Worzel, J Lamar; Ewing, Maurice (1969): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 1. U. S. Government Printing Office, I, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.1.1969
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 23.045500 * Longitude: -92.058700
Date/Time Start: 1968-08-17T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1968-08-17T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 19.50 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 138.25 m
Event(s):
1-2 * Latitude: 23.045500 * Longitude: -92.058700 * Date/Time: 1968-08-17T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3572.0 m * Penetration: 143.9 m * Recovery: 12.1 m * Location: Gulf of Mexico/KNOLL * Campaign: Leg1 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 5 cores; 26.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 45.7 % recovery
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
| 3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 9 | Carbonates | Carb | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 10 | Dolomite | Dol | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 11 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 12 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 13 | Pteropoda | Pteropoda | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 14 | Minerals, other | Min other | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 15 | Anhydrite | Anh | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 16 | Gypsum | Gp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 17 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 18 | Opaque minerals | Opaque | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 19 | Pyrite, FeS2 | Py | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
267 data points
Data
| 1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Carb [%] | 10 Dol [%] | 11 Nannos [%] | 12 Foram [%] | 13 Pteropoda [%] | 14 Min other [%] | 15 Anh [%] | 16 Gp [%] | 17 Clay min [%] | 18 Opaque [%] | 19 Py [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.50 | 1-2-1-1,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper pleistocene | MUD | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21.20 | 1-2-1-2,20 | 10 | 40 | 50 | Upper pleistocene | FORAM CALCILUTITE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| 21.90 | 1-2-1-2,90 | 15 | 40 | 45 | Upper pleistocene | FORAM CALCILUTITE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| 22.65 | 1-2-1-3,15 | 15 | 30 | 55 | Upper pleistocene | FORAM CALCILUTITE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 23.70 | 1-2-1-31,120 | 3 | 27 | 70 | NANNO CALCILUTITE | Minor lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 55 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | |
| 58.50 | 1-2-2-1,90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower pleistocene | COCCOLITH OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 68.30 | 1-2-3-11,150 | 3 | 17 | 80 | Upper pliocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 55 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 69.13 | 1-2-3-2,83 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Upper pliocene | COCCOLITH OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 55 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 69.13 | 1-2-3-2,83 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Upper pliocene | COCCOLITH OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 55 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| 70.55 | 1-2-3-3,75 | 5 | 45 | 50 | COCCOLITH OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 0 | 56 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 101.90 | 1-2-4-1,40 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Lower pliocene | NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 0 | 1 | 55 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 102.95 | 1-2-4-11,145 | 1 | 79 | 20 | Lower pliocene | DISCOASTER OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 23 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 103.14 | 1-2-4-2,14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Lower pliocene | COCCOLITH OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 137.20 | 1-2-5-1,90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Mesozoic | CAPROCK (CARBONATE) | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 138.25 | 1-2-5-2,45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | CALCITE CAPROCK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |