/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Anonymous (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 1-2. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.230303 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Pessagno, E A; Fischer, A G; Burk, Creighton A; Bukry, David; Berggren, William A; Beall, A O; Worzel, J Lamar; Ewing, Maurice (1969): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 1. U. S. Government Printing Office, I, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.1.1969 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: 23.045500 * LONGITUDE: -92.058700 DATE/TIME START: 1968-08-17T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1968-08-17T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 19.50 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 138.25 m Event(s): 1-2 * LATITUDE: 23.045500 * LONGITUDE: -92.058700 * DATE/TIME: 1968-08-17T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -3572.0 m * Penetration: 143.9 m * Recovery: 12.1 m * LOCATION: Gulf of Mexico/KNOLL * CAMPAIGN: Leg1 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.1.1969) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 5 cores; 26.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 45.7 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Carbonates [%] (Carb) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Dolomite [%] (Dol) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Pteropoda [%] (Pteropoda) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Minerals, other [%] (Min other) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Anhydrite [%] (Anh) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Gypsum [%] (Gp) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Clay minerals [%] (Clay min) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Opaque minerals [%] (Opaque) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Pyrite, FeS2 [%] (Py) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 267 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Carb [%] Dol [%] Nannos [%] Foram [%] Pteropoda [%] Min other [%] Anh [%] Gp [%] Clay min [%] Opaque [%] Py [%] 19.50 1-2-1-1,0 0 0 0 Upper pleistocene MUD Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.20 1-2-1-2,20 10 40 50 Upper pleistocene FORAM CALCILUTITE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 30 0 0 21.90 1-2-1-2,90 15 40 45 Upper pleistocene FORAM CALCILUTITE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 22.65 1-2-1-3,15 15 30 55 Upper pleistocene FORAM CALCILUTITE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 23.70 1-2-1-31,120 3 27 70 NANNO CALCILUTITE Minor lithology; relative abundance 0 0 55 1 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 58.50 1-2-2-1,90 0 0 0 Lower pleistocene COCCOLITH OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 0 90 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68.30 1-2-3-11,150 3 17 80 Upper pliocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 0 55 1 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 69.13 1-2-3-2,83 1 0 0 Upper pliocene COCCOLITH OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 0 55 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 69.13 1-2-3-2,83 3 0 0 Upper pliocene COCCOLITH OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 0 55 1 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 70.55 1-2-3-3,75 5 45 50 COCCOLITH OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 0 56 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 101.90 1-2-4-1,40 2 0 0 Lower pliocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 0 1 55 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 102.95 1-2-4-11,145 1 79 20 Lower pliocene DISCOASTER OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 23 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103.14 1-2-4-2,14 2 0 0 Lower pliocene COCCOLITH OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 137.20 1-2-5-1,90 0 0 0 Mesozoic CAPROCK (CARBONATE) Dominat lithology; relative abundance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 138.25 1-2-5-2,45 0 0 0 CALCITE CAPROCK Dominat lithology; relative abundance 95 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0