https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.995183Oelker, JuliaJuliaOelker0000-0002-0783-3617Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, Carl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgGaye, BirgitBirgitGaye0000-0002-5057-899XUniversität HamburgWaniek, Joanna JJoanna JWaniek0000-0003-3724-073XLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, WarnemündePANGAEA2026chlorophyll-aDAMFluorescenceturbidityUnderway measurementDATE/TIMELATITUDELONGITUDEDEPTH, waterShip speedChlorophyll aQuality flag, chlorophyll aTurbidity (Nephelometric turbidity unit)Quality flag, turbidityMeasurement containerFluorometer, Sea-Bird Scientific, ECO FLNTUData quality control procedures according to Copernicus Marine in situ TAC BGC quality control group (2021)Fluorometer, Sea-Bird Scientific, ECO FLNTU; Calibration according to Data processing reportFluorometer, Sea-Bird Scientific, ECO FLNTU; Sensor alignment correction according to Data Processing ReportSO303Sonne_2DAM Underway Research Data (DAM_Underway)DataHub Earth and Environment of the Helmholtz Association (DataHub)2024-01-10T00:00:00/2024-02-19T06:50:00Dataset10.48433/cr_so303https://helcom.fi/publications/guidelines-for-measuring-chlorophyll-a/452461 data pointstext/tab-separated-valuesCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalUnderway optical chlorophyll-a and turbidity data were collected along the cruise track with Sea-Bird Scientific ECO FLNTU sensors installed within two autonomous measurement systems, called self-cleaning monitoring boxes (SMBs). The SMBs measure alternatingly. While one box is measuring, the other one is being cleaned. The boxes switched generally every 6 hours. The water inlet for the SMBs is at about 4 m below sea surface. Observed chlorophyll-a and turbidity data were both quality controlled. Analysis of the chlorophyll-a and turbidity data during parallel operation of the sensors in the two boxes showed significant differences between the sensors. The sensors were aligned resulting in consistent chlorophyll-a and turbidity time series. The corrected chlorophyll-a data were calibrated based on chlorophyll-a values from discrete water samples taken from the underway system and measured fluorometrically in the lab. The turbidity time series was compared against suspended particulate matter (SPM) from surface water samples taken from Niskin bottles of the CTD frame and determined gravimetrically in the lab. Correlation between turbidity and sample SPM was poor. The calibrated chlorophyll-a time series and corrected turbidity time series were compared against Globcolour CHL1 and TSM products, respectively. Details on all quality control steps and the comparison with satellite data can be found in the data processing report. The data set user should keep in mind that some parts of the time series might be affected by non-photochemical quenching, see data processing report. It was out of the scope of the quality control to flag or correct non-photochemical quenching. The resulting data set contains the original data and corresponding quality flags achieved by the quality control algorithm as well as the calibrated chlorophyll-a and corrected turbidity data with corresponding quality flags. The data source is given through the name of the active SMB. The data set contains data during transit time and station work. We recommend to use ship's speed to filter for only transit data.51.6709480.11346-23.204237.08016