Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Ramskogler, Katharina; Hofmeister, Florentin; Castlunger, Sofia; Kinzner, Sarah; Tasser, Erich (2026): Environmental variables along elevation gradients on disturbed and undisturbed sites in three valleys of the Central European Alps [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.991478

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

Published: 2026-02-17DOI registered: 2026-03-13

RIS CitationBibTeX Citation ShareShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
The European Alps are particularly affected by climate change, experiencing more frequent heavy rainfall events as well as degradation of permafrost. These changes, in turn, trigger disturbance by geomorphic processes, which can influence vegetation development. The objective of the study of Kinzner et al. (2026) was to analyse the effects of disturbance on vegetation cover and species richness and to assess the response of individual species and plant groups and also analyse the effects of environmental parameters. In three different valleys in the Central European Alps vegetation surveys were conducted along elevation gradients. At each 100-metre interval of elevation, wherever feasible, a plot was established on a disturbed site as well as always a plot on undisturbed sites with a size or 10 × 10. The surveys in Martell Valley and Kauner Valley were performed twice, the one in Horlach Valley once. We estimated the cover of vascular species in percent. Using the cover values we calculated the community weighted means (CWM) of each Landolt indicator value (Landolt et al. 2010). Additionally, we calculated the relative cover of cryophilic and thermophilic species, different strategy types, and different functional plant groups. Furthermore, we extracted for each point the elevation, inclination, and aspect from digital terrain models (DTM) provided by the Chair of Physical geography of the Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt (for Kauner and Horlach Valley from 2017 and for Martell Valley from 2019). The extracted aspect was transformed to northness and eastness according to Dial (2017). The Stream Power Index (SPI) as a hydro-geomorphic prarameter was calculated following Florinsky (2017). A further parameter used, was the 5-years mean of the annual temperature and the 5-years mean of the annual sum of precipitation. Both values were calculated from daily data based on meteorological observations from weather stations in the surrounding. For inter- and extrapolating the daily mean temperature and the daily sum of precipitation to a 25 × 25 m grid resolution, we employed the fully distributed Water Flow and Balance Simulation Model (WaSiM) version 10.04.07 (Schulla 2021).
Keyword(s):
Central European Alps; elevation transects; Environmental variables; geomorphic disturbance
Supplement to:
Kinzner, Sarah; Ramskogler, Katharina; Castlunger, Sofia; Hofmeister, Florentin; Tasser, Erich (2026): Influence of Geomorphic Disturbance on Phenotypic Species Plasticity and Vegetation Cover in High‐Elevated Belts. Ecology and Evolution, 16(3), e73056, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73056
References:
Dial, Roman (2017): How to use aspects i.e. N, NE, SE etc. in PCA or CCA for analysis, especially using PAST. research gate, answer to a question
Florinsky, Igor V (2017): An illustrated introduction to general geomorphometry. Progress in Physical Geography, 41(6), 723-752, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133317733667
Landolt, E; Bäumler, B; Ehrhardt, A; Hegg, O; Klötzli, F; Lämmler, W; Nobis, M; Rudmann-Maurer, K; Schweingruber, Fritz Hans; Theurillat, J-P; Urmi, E; Vust, M; Wohlgemuth, T (2010): Flora indicativa: ökologische Zeigerwerte und biologische Kennzeichen zur Flora der Schweiz und der Alpen. Bern (in German), https://www.zora.uzh.ch/entities/publication/9a6da929-6630-4a6f-8afb-0a6a7f1a4a93
Schulla, Jörg (2021): Model Description WaSiM (Water balance Simulation Model). Hydrology Software Consulting J. Schulla, Zürich
Further details:
Metadata of meteorological stations. Metadata_of_meteorological_stations.xlsx
Funding:
German Research Foundation (DFG), grant/award no. 409552118: Short and long term feedback between vegetation and morphodynamic processes
German Research Foundation (DFG), grant/award no. 470445468: Short- and long-term feedback between vegetation and morphodynamic processes and climate warming
Provincia autonoma di Bolzano - Alto Adige, grant/award no. IT-DFG781607: SEHAG
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 46.834499 * Median Longitude: 10.808175 * South-bound Latitude: 46.472220 * West-bound Longitude: 10.635330 * North-bound Latitude: 47.173718 * East-bound Longitude: 11.018249
Date/Time Start: 2019-07-08T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2022-08-22T00:00:00
Minimum ELEVATION: 2117 m a.s.l. * Maximum ELEVATION: 2857 m a.s.l.
Event(s):
Hor_elev_11 * Latitude: 47.160848 * Longitude: 11.015465 * Date/Time Start: 2022-07-16T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2022-07-20T00:00:00 * Elevation: 2117.0 m * Location: Horlach Valley Tyrol, Austria * Method/Device: Multiple investigations (MULT)
Hor_elev_12 * Latitude: 47.161219 * Longitude: 11.015194 * Date/Time Start: 2022-07-16T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2022-07-20T00:00:00 * Elevation: 2120.0 m * Location: Horlach Valley Tyrol, Austria * Method/Device: Multiple investigations (MULT)
Hor_elev_21 * Latitude: 47.163028 * Longitude: 11.014103 * Date/Time Start: 2022-07-16T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2022-07-20T00:00:00 * Elevation: 2269.9 m * Location: Horlach Valley Tyrol, Austria * Method/Device: Multiple investigations (MULT)
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1Event labelEventRamskogler, Katharina
2LATITUDELatitudeRamskogler, KatharinaGeocode
3LONGITUDELongitudeRamskogler, KatharinaGeocode
4ELEVATIONElevationm a.s.l.Ramskogler, KatharinaGeocode
5Sampling dateSampling dateRamskogler, Katharinasampling year, the time span is given in the event table with the start date of the first sampling year and the end date of the second sampling year
6SamplingSamplingRamskogler, KatharinaSampling frequency: how often the surveys were done
7StabilityStabilityRamskogler, Katharina0 = undisturbed, 1 = disturbed
8TypeTypeRamskogler, Katharinaof disturbance
9Vascular species, coverVascular cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaField surveysampling year 1
10Vascular species, coverVascular cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaField surveysampling year 2
11Unvegetated areaUnveget area%Ramskogler, KatharinaField surveysampling year 1
12Unvegetated areaUnveget area%Ramskogler, KatharinaField surveysampling year 2
13Species richnessSRamskogler, Katharinasampling year 1
14Species richnessSRamskogler, Katharinasampling year 2
15Cryophilic species, coverCryophilic cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
16Cryophilic species, coverCryophilic cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
17Thermophilic species, coverThermophilic cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
18Thermophilic species, coverThermophilic cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
19Stress-tolerant species, coverStress-tolerant cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
20Stress-tolerant species, coverStress-tolerant cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
21Competitive species, coverCompetitive cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
22Competitive species, coverCompetitive cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
23Ruderal species, coverRuderal cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
24Ruderal species, coverRuderal cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
25Competitor–stress‑tolerator–ruderal strategists, coverCSR‑strategists cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
26Competitor–stress‑tolerator–ruderal strategists, coverCSR‑strategists cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
27Trees, coverTrees cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
28Trees, coverTrees cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
29Shrubs, coverShrubs cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
30Shrubs, coverShrubs cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
31Dwarf shrubs, coverDwarf shrubs cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
32Dwarf shrubs, coverDwarf shrubs cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
33Herbs, coverHerbs cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
34Herbs, coverHerbs cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
35Legumes, coverLegumes cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
36Legumes, coverLegumes cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
37Graminoids, coverGraminoids cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
38Graminoids, coverGraminoids cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
39Bryophytes, coverBryophytes cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
40Bryophytes, coverBryophytes cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
41Lichen, coverLichen cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 1; relative
42Lichen, coverLichen cov%Ramskogler, KatharinaCalculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all speciessampling year 2; relative
43Stream power indexSPIRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated according to Florinsky (2017)
44AspectAspectRamskogler, KatharinaDerived from the digital terrain model (DTM)as factor, DTM provided by the Chair of Physical Geography, Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt
45NorthnessNorthnessRamskogler, Katharinaaspect transformed into northness using the trigonomic funcitons after Dial et al. 2017
46EastnessEastnessRamskogler, Katharinaaspect transformed into eastness using the trigonomic funcitons after Dial et al. 2017
47InclinationIncldegRamskogler, KatharinaDerived from the digital terrain model (DTM)DTM) provided by the Chair of Physical Geography, Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt
48Temperature, annual meanMAT°CRamskogler, Katharina5-years mean; calculated from daily datafor inter- and extrapolating daily and annual temperature and precipitation to a 25 × 25 m grid resolution we used the fully distributed Water Flow and Balance Simulation Model (WaSiM) version 10.04.07 (Schulla J., 2021)
49Precipitation, annual totalPrecip annual totmm/aRamskogler, Katharina5-years mean; calculated from daily datafor inter- and extrapolating daily and annual temperature and precipitation to a 25 × 25 m grid resolution we used the fully distributed Water Flow and Balance Simulation Model (WaSiM) version 10.04.07 (Schulla J., 2021)
50Landodt indicator value for light, community weighted meanCWM Landolt lightRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 1
51Landodt indicator value for temperature, community weighted meanCWM Landolt tempRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 1
52Landodt indicator value for humus, community weighted meanCWM Landolt humusRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 1
53Landodt indicator value for nutrient content, community weighted meanCWM Landolt nutrientRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 1
54Landodt indicator value for soil reactivity, community weighted meanCWM Landolt soil reactRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 1
55Landodt indicator value for soil dispersion, community weighted meanCWM Landolt soil dispersRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 1
56Landodt indicator value for soil moisture, community weighted meanCWM Landolt soil moistRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 1
57Landodt indicator value for light, community weighted meanCWM Landolt lightRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 1
58Landodt indicator value for temperature, community weighted meanCWM Landolt tempRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 2
59Landodt indicator value for humus, community weighted meanCWM Landolt humusRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 2
60Landodt indicator value for nutrient content, community weighted meanCWM Landolt nutrientRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 2
61Landodt indicator value for soil reactivity, community weighted meanCWM Landolt soil reactRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 2
62Landodt indicator value for soil dispersion, community weighted meanCWM Landolt soil dispersRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 2
63Landodt indicator value for soil moisture, community weighted meanCWM Landolt soil moistRamskogler, KatharinaCalculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010)sampling year 2
Status:
Curation Level: Enhanced curation (CurationLevelC)
Size:
1909 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML