Ramskogler, Katharina; Hofmeister, Florentin; Castlunger, Sofia; Kinzner, Sarah; Tasser, Erich (2026): Environmental variables along elevation gradients on disturbed and undisturbed sites in three valleys of the Central European Alps [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.991478
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Published: 2026-02-17 • DOI registered: 2026-03-13
Abstract:
The European Alps are particularly affected by climate change, experiencing more frequent heavy rainfall events as well as degradation of permafrost. These changes, in turn, trigger disturbance by geomorphic processes, which can influence vegetation development. The objective of the study of Kinzner et al. (2026) was to analyse the effects of disturbance on vegetation cover and species richness and to assess the response of individual species and plant groups and also analyse the effects of environmental parameters. In three different valleys in the Central European Alps vegetation surveys were conducted along elevation gradients. At each 100-metre interval of elevation, wherever feasible, a plot was established on a disturbed site as well as always a plot on undisturbed sites with a size or 10 × 10. The surveys in Martell Valley and Kauner Valley were performed twice, the one in Horlach Valley once. We estimated the cover of vascular species in percent. Using the cover values we calculated the community weighted means (CWM) of each Landolt indicator value (Landolt et al. 2010). Additionally, we calculated the relative cover of cryophilic and thermophilic species, different strategy types, and different functional plant groups. Furthermore, we extracted for each point the elevation, inclination, and aspect from digital terrain models (DTM) provided by the Chair of Physical geography of the Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt (for Kauner and Horlach Valley from 2017 and for Martell Valley from 2019). The extracted aspect was transformed to northness and eastness according to Dial (2017). The Stream Power Index (SPI) as a hydro-geomorphic prarameter was calculated following Florinsky (2017). A further parameter used, was the 5-years mean of the annual temperature and the 5-years mean of the annual sum of precipitation. Both values were calculated from daily data based on meteorological observations from weather stations in the surrounding. For inter- and extrapolating the daily mean temperature and the daily sum of precipitation to a 25 × 25 m grid resolution, we employed the fully distributed Water Flow and Balance Simulation Model (WaSiM) version 10.04.07 (Schulla 2021).
Keyword(s):
Supplement to:
Kinzner, Sarah; Ramskogler, Katharina; Castlunger, Sofia; Hofmeister, Florentin; Tasser, Erich (2026): Influence of Geomorphic Disturbance on Phenotypic Species Plasticity and Vegetation Cover in High‐Elevated Belts. Ecology and Evolution, 16(3), e73056, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73056
References:
Dial, Roman (2017): How to use aspects i.e. N, NE, SE etc. in PCA or CCA for analysis, especially using PAST. research gate, answer to a question
Florinsky, Igor V (2017): An illustrated introduction to general geomorphometry. Progress in Physical Geography, 41(6), 723-752, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133317733667
Landolt, E; Bäumler, B; Ehrhardt, A; Hegg, O; Klötzli, F; Lämmler, W; Nobis, M; Rudmann-Maurer, K; Schweingruber, Fritz Hans; Theurillat, J-P; Urmi, E; Vust, M; Wohlgemuth, T (2010): Flora indicativa: ökologische Zeigerwerte und biologische Kennzeichen zur Flora der Schweiz und der Alpen. Bern (in German), https://www.zora.uzh.ch/entities/publication/9a6da929-6630-4a6f-8afb-0a6a7f1a4a93
Further details:
Metadata of meteorological stations. Metadata_of_meteorological_stations.xlsx
Funding:
German Research Foundation (DFG), grant/award no. 409552118: Short and long term feedback between vegetation and morphodynamic processes
German Research Foundation (DFG), grant/award no. 470445468: Short- and long-term feedback between vegetation and morphodynamic processes and climate warming
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 46.834499 * Median Longitude: 10.808175 * South-bound Latitude: 46.472220 * West-bound Longitude: 10.635330 * North-bound Latitude: 47.173718 * East-bound Longitude: 11.018249
Date/Time Start: 2019-07-08T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2022-08-22T00:00:00
Minimum ELEVATION: 2117 m a.s.l. * Maximum ELEVATION: 2857 m a.s.l.
Event(s):
Hor_elev_11 * Latitude: 47.160848 * Longitude: 11.015465 * Date/Time Start: 2022-07-16T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2022-07-20T00:00:00 * Elevation: 2117.0 m * Location: Horlach Valley Tyrol, Austria * Method/Device: Multiple investigations (MULT)
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Event label | Event | Ramskogler, Katharina | |||
| 2 | LATITUDE | Latitude | Ramskogler, Katharina | Geocode | ||
| 3 | LONGITUDE | Longitude | Ramskogler, Katharina | Geocode | ||
| 4 | ELEVATION | Elevation | m a.s.l. | Ramskogler, Katharina | Geocode | |
| 5 | Sampling date | Sampling date | Ramskogler, Katharina | sampling year, the time span is given in the event table with the start date of the first sampling year and the end date of the second sampling year | ||
| 6 | Sampling | Sampling | Ramskogler, Katharina | Sampling frequency: how often the surveys were done | ||
| 7 | Stability | Stability | Ramskogler, Katharina | 0 = undisturbed, 1 = disturbed | ||
| 8 | Type | Type | Ramskogler, Katharina | of disturbance | ||
| 9 | Vascular species, cover | Vascular cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Field survey | sampling year 1 |
| 10 | Vascular species, cover | Vascular cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Field survey | sampling year 2 |
| 11 | Unvegetated area | Unveget area | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Field survey | sampling year 1 |
| 12 | Unvegetated area | Unveget area | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Field survey | sampling year 2 |
| 13 | Species richness | S | Ramskogler, Katharina | sampling year 1 | ||
| 14 | Species richness | S | Ramskogler, Katharina | sampling year 2 | ||
| 15 | Cryophilic species, cover | Cryophilic cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 16 | Cryophilic species, cover | Cryophilic cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 17 | Thermophilic species, cover | Thermophilic cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 18 | Thermophilic species, cover | Thermophilic cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 19 | Stress-tolerant species, cover | Stress-tolerant cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 20 | Stress-tolerant species, cover | Stress-tolerant cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 21 | Competitive species, cover | Competitive cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 22 | Competitive species, cover | Competitive cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 23 | Ruderal species, cover | Ruderal cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 24 | Ruderal species, cover | Ruderal cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 25 | Competitor–stress‑tolerator–ruderal strategists, cover | CSR‑strategists cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 26 | Competitor–stress‑tolerator–ruderal strategists, cover | CSR‑strategists cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 27 | Trees, cover | Trees cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 28 | Trees, cover | Trees cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 29 | Shrubs, cover | Shrubs cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 30 | Shrubs, cover | Shrubs cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 31 | Dwarf shrubs, cover | Dwarf shrubs cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 32 | Dwarf shrubs, cover | Dwarf shrubs cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 33 | Herbs, cover | Herbs cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 34 | Herbs, cover | Herbs cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 35 | Legumes, cover | Legumes cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 36 | Legumes, cover | Legumes cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 37 | Graminoids, cover | Graminoids cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 38 | Graminoids, cover | Graminoids cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 39 | Bryophytes, cover | Bryophytes cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 40 | Bryophytes, cover | Bryophytes cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 41 | Lichen, cover | Lichen cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 1; relative |
| 42 | Lichen, cover | Lichen cov | % | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated; percentage cover of the group relative to sum of all species | sampling year 2; relative |
| 43 | Stream power index | SPI | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated according to Florinsky (2017) | ||
| 44 | Aspect | Aspect | Ramskogler, Katharina | Derived from the digital terrain model (DTM) | as factor, DTM provided by the Chair of Physical Geography, Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt | |
| 45 | Northness | Northness | Ramskogler, Katharina | aspect transformed into northness using the trigonomic funcitons after Dial et al. 2017 | ||
| 46 | Eastness | Eastness | Ramskogler, Katharina | aspect transformed into eastness using the trigonomic funcitons after Dial et al. 2017 | ||
| 47 | Inclination | Incl | deg | Ramskogler, Katharina | Derived from the digital terrain model (DTM) | DTM) provided by the Chair of Physical Geography, Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt |
| 48 | Temperature, annual mean | MAT | °C | Ramskogler, Katharina | 5-years mean; calculated from daily data | for inter- and extrapolating daily and annual temperature and precipitation to a 25 × 25 m grid resolution we used the fully distributed Water Flow and Balance Simulation Model (WaSiM) version 10.04.07 (Schulla J., 2021) |
| 49 | Precipitation, annual total | Precip annual tot | mm/a | Ramskogler, Katharina | 5-years mean; calculated from daily data | for inter- and extrapolating daily and annual temperature and precipitation to a 25 × 25 m grid resolution we used the fully distributed Water Flow and Balance Simulation Model (WaSiM) version 10.04.07 (Schulla J., 2021) |
| 50 | Landodt indicator value for light, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt light | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 1 | |
| 51 | Landodt indicator value for temperature, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt temp | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 1 | |
| 52 | Landodt indicator value for humus, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt humus | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 1 | |
| 53 | Landodt indicator value for nutrient content, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt nutrient | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 1 | |
| 54 | Landodt indicator value for soil reactivity, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt soil react | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 1 | |
| 55 | Landodt indicator value for soil dispersion, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt soil dispers | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 1 | |
| 56 | Landodt indicator value for soil moisture, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt soil moist | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 1 | |
| 57 | Landodt indicator value for light, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt light | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 1 | |
| 58 | Landodt indicator value for temperature, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt temp | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 2 | |
| 59 | Landodt indicator value for humus, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt humus | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 2 | |
| 60 | Landodt indicator value for nutrient content, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt nutrient | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 2 | |
| 61 | Landodt indicator value for soil reactivity, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt soil react | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 2 | |
| 62 | Landodt indicator value for soil dispersion, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt soil dispers | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 2 | |
| 63 | Landodt indicator value for soil moisture, community weighted mean | CWM Landolt soil moist | Ramskogler, Katharina | Calculated based on the cover of the plant species and the Landolt indicator values (Landolt et al. 2010) | sampling year 2 |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-4.0)
Status:
Curation Level: Enhanced curation (CurationLevelC)
Size:
1909 data points
