Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Röder, Juliane; Brandl, Roland (2024): Raw litter decomposition data from five elevational transects on the southern slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.964727

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

Published: 2024-02-13DOI registered: 2024-02-13

RIS CitationBibTeX Citation Copy Citation ShareShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
We used litter bags with maize husks (Zea mays L.) to compare decomposition rates in 12 vegetation types along an elevation gradient of 3600 m on the southern slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, with pairs of natural and disturbed vegetation types along an elevation gradient of 2300 m, and along a land–use gradient from natural forests, traditional agroforestry/homegardens, grasslands and coffee plantations. For details on study sites, see e.g. Peters et al. 2019 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1048-z), Röder et al. 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12403), or any of the other data sets from the same study sites (https://www.pangaea.de/?q=project:label:KiLi).
We used litter bags with maize husks as a standard litter (10 cm × 15 cm, mesh size 4 mm × 4 mm (large) or 20 µm × 20 µm (small)). Standard litter consisted of 5 g ± 0.05 g intact inner leaves of maize husks. The maize husks originated from two fields managed by the same farmer. Husks with visible fungal spots were not used, but we had to assume that all husks were infected. The litter was dried at 72 °C for one week to reduce the effect of microorganisms already present on the husks, and then left in the lab for another 2 to 3 days to adjust to normal air humidity and to assume a stable mass before litter bag preparation. Additional litter bags that were not exposed in the field (control) were used to estimate moisture (8.8 % ± 1.6 % mean ± SD, w/w) and ash content (3.0 % ± 0.31 %) at the time of preparation. Moisture and ash content were used to calculate ash–free organic matter content in the litter samples exposed at the sites. Sub-samples of 2 mg were analyzed for carbon (43 % ± 1.2 %) and nitrogen content (0.29 % ± 0.071 %), resulting in a C:N ratio of 156 ± 30.4. Handling bias was close to zero owing to the soft texture of the husks.
In August 2011, we placed 12 litter bags per type (large mesh, large mesh + naphthalene, small mesh) on one site each of the lower six vegetation types and of natural Ocotea forest. We additionally placed litter bags on three sites at higher elevations that were not used in the final set of 60 project sites. We collected 6 bags per type after ca. 5 weeks (between 40 and 46 days) and 6 bags per type after ca. 10 weeks (between 66 and 89 days).
In March 2012, at the beginning of the cold wet season, we placed 6 litter bags per type (large mesh, large mesh + naphthalene, small mesh) on each of the 60 study sites along the elevation gradient. Bags were arranged in three blocks to cover site–inherent variation. Owing to logistics at the time of collection, we could not sample two of the Erica forest sites, reducing the total number of litter bags to 3 bag types (treatments) x 3 bags x 2 collecting times x 58 sites = 1044 bags. We collected 3 bags per type and site after ca. 5 weeks (between 34 and 53 days) and 3 bags per type and site after ca. 10 weeks (between 63 and 86 days, Table 1). Unfortunately, at four grassland sites and one site in a coffee plantation, litter bags were destroyed accidentally or intentionally, so we decided to collect all remaining bags from these already after 5 weeks. From one grassland site all samples were lost, reducing the number of sampling sites available for this sampling round to 57. Some more bags were lost, or samples could not be used for analysis (soil contamination, accidents or erroneous documentation during sample processing in the lab), further reducing the number of valid bags.
In September 2012, at the beginning of the warm wet season, we placed 3-6 litter bags per type (6 bags: large mesh, large mesh + naphthalene, small mesh; 3 bags: small mesh + naphthalene) per site in two natural and four disturbed vegetation types, i.e. in all sites of the two lower elevation levels. Due to logistical challenges, we could only sample one of five elevation transects. We collected 6 bags per type and site after ca. 10 weeks (between 67 and 84 days).
In January 2013, we placed litter bags of all four types on a savanna site for a demonstration and collected the bags after 7 days.
Keyword(s):
altitudinal transect; Field experiment; Laboratory experiment; litter bag experiment; litter mass loss; maize; mountain; naphthalene; Zea mays L.
Supplement to:
Röder, Juliane; Appelhans, Tim; Peters, Marcell Karl; Nauss, Thomas; Brandl, Roland (2024): Disturbance can slow down litter decomposition, depending on severity of disturbance and season: an example from Mount Kilimanjaro. Web Ecology, 24(1), 11-33, https://doi.org/10.5194/we-24-11-2024
Original version:
Röder, Juliane; Brandl, Roland (2024): Raw litter decomposition data from five elevational transects on the southern slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.964774
References:
Hemp, Andreas: Detailed position of KiLi research plots [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.894721
Project(s):
Funding:
German Research Foundation (DFG), grant/award no. 107847609: Kilimanjaro Research Group
Coverage:
Median Latitude: -3.218222 * Median Longitude: 37.386077 * South-bound Latitude: -3.388903 * West-bound Longitude: 37.236264 * North-bound Latitude: -3.046441 * East-bound Longitude: 37.684015
Date/Time Start: 2010-10-01T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2011-11-03T00:00:00
Minimum Elevation: 2990.0 m * Maximum Elevation: 4185.0 m
Event(s):
Control * Date/Time: 2010-10-01T00:00:00 * Location: Hai District, Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania * Method/Device: Laboratory experiment * Comment: The approximate area where the maize field was located where we hand collected our standard litter.
jul1 * Latitude: -3.090000 * Longitude: 37.260000 * Date/Time Start: 2011-08-19T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2011-11-01T00:00:00 * Elevation: 2990.0 m * Location: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania * Method/Device: Field experiment * Comment: Extra site: forest Podocarpus disturbed
jul2 * Latitude: -3.070000 * Longitude: 37.280000 * Date/Time Start: 2011-08-18T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2011-11-02T00:00:00 * Elevation: 3780.0 m * Location: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania * Method/Device: Field experiment * Comment: Extra site: Helichrysum
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1Event labelEventBrandl, Roland
2Type of studyStudy typeBrandl, Roland
3PlotPlotBrandl, Roland
4Vegetation typeVegetation typeBrandl, Roland
5DisturbanceDisturbanceBrandl, Roland
6ELEVATIONElevationm a.s.l.Brandl, RolandGeocode
7LATITUDELatitudeBrandl, RolandGeocode – Coordinate of the midpoint of the study site, decimal degrees, projection WGS 84.
8LONGITUDELongitudeBrandl, RolandGeocode – Coordinate of the midpoint of the study site, decimal degrees, projection WGS 84.
9SamplingSamplingBrandl, RolandSampling round
10DEPTH, soilDepth soilmBrandl, RolandGeocode
11Sample position codeSamp pos codeBrandl, RolandPosition within site. Litter bags were exposed in three different groups to cover site inherent structural variation.
12Bag numberBagBrandl, RolandUnique litter bag number, printed christmas tree lable included in each bag.
13Treatment: litter bag typeT:litter bag typeBrandl, RolandOne of four types: lm - large mesh (4 mm x 4 mm), lmn - large mesh plus naphthalene (1 ball of ca. 4g), sm - small mesh (20 µm x 20 µm), smn - small mesh plus naphthalene (1 ball of 4g).
14Treatment: mesh sizeT:mesh sizeµmBrandl, Roland
15Treatment: naphthaleneT:naphthaleneBrandl, RolandYes means 1 ball of ca. 4 g inside the litter bag.
16Date/time start, experimentDate/time start expBrandl, Roland
17Date/time end, experimentDate/time end expBrandl, Roland
18Experiment durationExp durationdaysBrandl, RolandWe collected bags after ca. 5 weeks and after ca. 10 weeks. Some bags were only found several months later.
19Litter massLitter mgBrandl, RolandBefore experiment. All samples were prepared with 5g (+-0.05g) standard litter (maize husks).
20Subsample, dry massSubsamp dry mgBrandl, RolandFor CN analyses. Sub-samples of control samples of ca. 0.2 g were used for carbon and nitrogen analyses.
21Litter moistureLitter moisturegBrandl, RolandCalculatedLitter mass before experiment minus Dry sample mass after experiment, before burning minus Sample for CN analyses
22Ash free dry massafdmgBrandl, RolandCalculatedLitter mass before experiment minus mean moisture content minus mean ash content, mean moisture content and mean ash content estimated with control bags.
23Dry massDry mgBrandl, RolandTotal dry sample mass before burning, including soil if prevalent.
24Ash massAsh mgBrandl, Roland
25Ash free dry massafdmgBrandl, RolandMicrowave Drying System, CEM, SAM 255After experiment
26Ash free dry massafdmgBrandl, RolandCalculatedLoss (ash-free mass before experiment minus ash-free mass after experiment)
27Ash free dry massafdm%Brandl, RolandCalculatedLoss (ash-free mass before experiment minus ash-free mass after experiment)
28Hole size descriptionHole size descBrandl, RolandEstimatedSize of peg hole. Some 20 µm bags were fixed with a peg punched through the middle of the bag instead of just clamping the bag to the soil. Here, we estimated the size of these peg holes, with 1 = small hole (peg closed off the hole in the field), 2 = medium sized hole (peg probably cloesed off the hole in the field). We excluded any bags with larger holes.
29DateDateBrandl, RolandFor litter bag preparation
Status:
Curation Level: Enhanced curation (CurationLevelC)
Size:
37668 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML (shows only first 2000 rows)