Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Rudaya, Natalia; Nazarova, Larisa B; Frolova, Larisa A; Palagushkina, Olga V; Soenov, Vasiliy; Cao, Xianyong; Syrykh, Luidmila S; Grekov, Ivan; Otgonbayar, Demberel; Bayarkhuu, Batbayar (2023): Pollen counts of sediment core from Lake Bayan Nuur [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.953299, In: Rudaya, N et al. (2023): The link between climate change and biodiversity of lacustrine inhabitants and terrestrial plant communities of the Uvs Nuur Basin (Mongolia) during the last three millennia [dataset bundled publication]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.953309

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
A total of 94 samples (0.8-1.2 g of dry sediment) from lake Bayan Nuur (Core BN2016-1) were used for pollen and non pollen palynomorphs analysis. The samples were chemically treated according to the methodology suggested by Faegri and Iversen (1989, doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.11.015), including treatment with a 10% solution of hydrochloric acid to dissolve carbonates, a 10% solution of potassium hydroxide to remove humic acids, and high concentration hydrofluoric acid to remove silicates. Acetolysis was not performed. A Lycopodium spore tablet (batch 483216) was added to each sample to calculate the total palynomorph concentration. Pollen grains mounted in glycerine were analyzed under a transmitted light microscope AxioImagerD2 with x400 magnification. In addition to pollen and spores, other non-pollen palynomorphs (NPPs), including spores and the fruit bodies of coprophilous fungi, were counted, and are included in the total sum. Pollen percentages were calculated based on the pollen sum of all detected taxa, taken as 100%. NPP percentages were calculated on the basis of the total sum taken as 100%. In the pollen diagram, dung fungi Sordaria, Sporormiella, and single coprophypous Ascomycetes (Podospora and Gelasinospora) are combined in one group, “coprophilous 40 fungi”. The coprophilous fungi were calculated in the pollen slides simultaneously with pollen. As fungi spore production and incorporation into sediments is independent of vegetation or pollen deposition; we calculated the coprophilous fungi concentrations and accumulation rates (influx) that would be the most reliable way to assess the real herbivore population and grazing trends (according to Wilmshurst and Wood, 2013, doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.2.0390).
Funding:
Russian scientific foundation (RSF), grant/award no. 20-17-00110: Holocene climate variability and biodiversity changes in the Altai Mountains based on the study of high-resolution lacustrine records
Coverage:
Latitude: 50.010720 * Longitude: 93.974500
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.12 m
Event(s):
BN2016-1 (Bayan Nuur) * Latitude: 50.010720 * Longitude: 93.974500 * Lake water depth: 29 m * Recovery: 1.13 m * Method/Device: Sediment corer (SEDCO)
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1DEPTH, sediment/rockDepth sedmRudaya, NataliaGeocode
2AbiesAbi#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
3LarixLar#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
4PiceaPic#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
5PinaceaePinae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
6PinusPin#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
7Pinus sibiricaPin.b#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
8Pinus sylvestrisPin.s#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
9AlnusAln#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
10AlnusAln#Rudaya, NataliaCountingAlnus subg. Alnobetula
11BetulaBet#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
12EphedraEph#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
13EricalesErl#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
14HippophaeHpp#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
15JuglansJug#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
16JuniperusJun#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
17LoniceraLon#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
18Nitraria sibiricaN. sibirica#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
19RibesRib#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
20SalixSal#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
21cf. Tsugacf. Tsu#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
22UlmusUlm#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
23AlliumAll#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
24AmaranthaceaeAmaceae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
25ApiaceaeApiae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
26ArtemisiaArt#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
27AsteraceaeAstae#Rudaya, NataliaCountingAsteraceae subf. Asteroideae
28AsteraceaeAstae#Rudaya, NataliaCountingAsteraceae subf. Cichorioideae
29BrassicaceaeBraae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
30CaryophyllaceaeCphae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
31cf. Cerealiacf. Cerealia#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
32CyperaceaeCypae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
33FabaceaeFabae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
34GeraniaceaeGerae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
35LamiaceaeLamae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
36LiliaceaeLilae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
37Other herbsot.herbs#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
38PlantagoPla#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
39PoaceaePoac#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
40PolemoniumPoe#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
41PolygonumPol#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
42RanunculaceaeRanae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
43RosaceaeRosae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
44RumexRum#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
45SanguisorbaSan#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
46SaxifragaSax#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
47SparganiumSpa#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
48ThalictrumTha#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
49TyphaTyp#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
50UrticaUrt#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
51Scleranthus annuusScl.a#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
52LycopodiumLyc#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
53PolypodiophytaPolypodiophyta#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
54Selaginella rupestrisSel.r#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
55SphagnumSph#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
56AmoebaeAmoebae#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
57Arcella arenariaArl.a#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
58BotryococcusBot#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
59cf. Debaryacf. Debarya#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
60Coprophilous fungiC. fungi#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
61CosmariumCoi#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
62Eucoleus hepaticaE. hepatica#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
63GlomusGlomus#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
64Macrobiotus hufelandiiM. hufelandii#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
65PediastrumPdi#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
66SordariaSor#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
67TardigradaTardigrada#Rudaya, NataliaCounting
Status:
Curation Level: Enhanced curation (CurationLevelC)
Size:
1913 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML