Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Tesfaalem Ghebreyohannes; Nyssen, Jan; Emnet Negash; Hailemariam Meaza; Zbelo Tesfamariam (2022): Spatially explicit dataset on crop status of 161 farm plots in Tigray (20-30 August 2021) [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.943374

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
There was hunger in Tigray (north Ethiopia) throughout the most of 2021 due to the effects of the Tigray conflict (which began in early November 2020). Armed forces from Ethiopia, Eritrea, and the neighboring Amhara region fought against the forces of Tigray's regional government in the first half of the year; in the second half of the year, warfare was primarily outside of Tigray, more to the south, while Tigray itself was subjected to a blockade, with all telecommunication and lifelines to the outside world cut (Pellet, 2021, Gayim, 2021, Ramos, 2021). Due to a lack of economic activity, limited food supplies, and limited humanitarian access, 70 percent of the population went hungry, resulting in significant levels of acute food insecurity and excess mortality (Plaut, 2021, Istratii, 2021, Weldemichel, 2021, Oxford Analytica, 2021, Devi, 2021, Müller and Read, 2021). The famine was at its worst from September to December 2021, as it took until December to consume the previous year's low harvest; the lean period was extremely harsh. That period of time occurs between the end of the last food supply and the commencement of the new crop (Hirvonen et al., 2016). We offer field data obtained by the end of August 2021, which were evaluated to determine the percentage of Tigray's land that was seeded on schedule, the types of crops sown, and the condition of these crops. A team of geographers visited 161 agricultural plots in an area indicative of the region's diverse bio-physical circumstances, including elevation (plots ranged from 1767 to 2598 meters above sea level), lithology, soil type, rainfall patterns, and hence cropping strategies (Nyssen et al., 2019, Alemtsehay Tsegay et al., 2019). Other land uses, such as irrigated land, grassland, barren land, bushland, and forest, were left out of the analysis. We visited ecoregions with different biophysical and agro-ecological characteristics along main roads in six districts between 20 and 30 August 2021: Tsa'ida Imba, Kilte Awula'ilo (including including croplands on the outskirts of Wukro's urban district), Dogu'a Tembien (including Hagere Selam), Samre, Hintalo (including Addi Gudom), and Inderta (including Mekelle). The investigations typically took place some hundreds of meters away from the main roads, as parallel transect walks, observing and talking to farmers present on the land. Participatory monitoring was used to collect data for each cropland, which included recording the crop type, a group assessment of the crop's status according to local standards (good, medium, bad, failed; taking into account growth features such as plant height, greenness and density, ear length, homogeneity in crop stand), observations of whether or not neighboring farmers cropped in block, and a semi-structured interview with the farmer or a group discussion (Van De Fliert et al., 2000, Nyumba et al., 2018, Young and Hinton, 1996). Aside from the usual crop evaluation, emphasis was paid to block wise cropping with adjacent farmers since, like three-field systems, this practice is an indicative of an internally well-organized community, and hints to a superior yield forecast as it prevents disruptions (Nyssen et al., 2008, Hopcroft, 1994, Ruthenberg, 1980). According to descriptive statistics from the dataset, at the end of August, 21% of the monitored farm parcels had been left fallow, meaning no crops had been planted (34 plots out of 161). However, 9 percent of the fallow plots had no weeds, indicating that the ground had been ploughed but not seeded. A further 7% of the plots were planted with flax or niger seed, which is often used to improve fallow soil quality rather than crop output. Among the cultivated areas, 62 plots (49%) were planted with wheat, barley, or a combination of both (hanfets), while 33 plots (26%) were planted with tef. Only 6% of the land was planted with maize, and only 4% with sorghum. In the plots containing crops that were examined, 40% had been seeded in block, in collaboration with the owners of surrounding lands. Wheat and barley, in particular, were seeded in blocks (53 percent). Nearly half (47 percent) of the wheat and barley fields, as well as two of the five sorghum lands, were in fair condition. In contrast, four of the seven maize-growing plots were in bad condition, and one had completely failed. 67 percent of the tef lands and 73 percent of the oil crops (mainly flax) were also in bad condition
Keyword(s):
Cereal cultivation; Fallow land; Famine; Ground control point; Subsistence farming; Tigray war
Related to:
Devi, Sharmila (2021): Aid blocked as Tigray faces catastrophic hunger. The Lancet, 397(10293), 2451, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01433-1
Gayim, Eyassu (2021): The War in Tigray and the Challenges Faced by the United Nations. Nordicum-Mediterraneum, 16(1), https://doi.org/10.33112/nm.16.1.21
Hirvonen, Kalle; Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum; Worku, Ibrahim (2016): Seasonality and household diets in Ethiopia. Public Health Nutrition, 19(10), 1723-1730, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015003237
Hopcroft, Rosemary L (1994): The origins of regular open field systems in pre-industrial Europe. Journal of European Economic History, 23, 563
Istratii, Romina (2021): On the Conflict in Tigray. Orthodox Christian Studies Center of Fordham University
Müller, Tanja R; Read, Róisín (2021): Editors' Introduction: Humanity and Solidarity. Journal of Humanitarian Affairs, 3(1), 1-3, https://doi.org/10.7227/JHA.053
Nyssen, Jan; Naudts, Jozef; De Geyndt, Karen; Haile, Mitiku; Poesen, Jean; Moeyersons, Jan; Deckers, Jozef (2008): Soils and land use in the Tigray highlands (Northern Ethiopia). Land Degradation & Development, 19(3), 257-274, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.840
Nyumba, Tobias Ochieng; Wilson, Kerrie; Derrick, Christina J; Mukherjee, Nibedita (2018): The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20-32, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Oxford Analytica (2021): Ethiopia faces undiminished Tigray famine risk. Emerald Expert Briefings, https://doi.org/10.1108/OXAN-ES262096
Pellet, Philippe (2021): Understanding the 2020-2021 Tigray Conflict in Ethiopia - Background, Root Causes, and Consequences. KKI ELEMZÉSEK, 39, 1-20
Plaut, Martin (2021): The Tigray Famine. The RUSI Journal, 166(4), 22-28, https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2021.1981630
Ramos, João (2021): Tigray Tragedy, a Graphic Essay In: Stichproben - Vienna. Institut für Afrikawissenschaften, Wien
Ruthenberg, Hans (1980): Farming systems in the tropics. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Tesfaalem Ghebreyohannes; Hailemariam Meaza; Zbelo Tesfamariam; Emnet Negash; Nyssen, Jan (2022): Spatially explicit dataset on crop status of 262 farm plots in Tigray (24-29 August 2022). PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.951344
Tsegay, Alemtsehay; Abrha, Berhanu; Hruy, Getachew (2019): 27. Major Crops and Cropping Systems in Dogu'a Tembien. In: Nyssen, J.; Jacob, M.; Amaury F. (Eds): Geo-trekking in Ethiopia's Tropical Mountains. Springer, 403-413
Van De Fliert, Elske; Asmunati, Rini; Tantowijoyo, Warsito (2000): Participatory approaches and scaling-up. CIAT Workshop: Working with farmers: the key to adoption of forage technologie, 1-12
Weldemichel, Teklehaymanot G (2021): Inventing hell: how the Ethiopian and Eritrean regimes produced famine in Tigray. Human Geography, https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786211061431
Young, D; Hinton, R (1996): An introduction to participatory appraisal techniques: sharing experience from China and Nepal. London, VSO
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 13.643486 * Median Longitude: 39.435153 * South-bound Latitude: 13.188100 * West-bound Longitude: 39.157700 * North-bound Latitude: 14.069700 * East-bound Longitude: 39.607700
Minimum ALTITUDE: 1767 m * Maximum ALTITUDE: 2598 m
Event(s):
Tigray_Adi_Awso_1 * Latitude: 13.278300 * Longitude: 39.291700 * Location: Africa, Ethiopia * Method/Device: Field measurement * Comment: Obtained: end of August 2021
Tigray_Adi_Awso_2 * Latitude: 13.285700 * Longitude: 39.305000 * Location: Africa, Ethiopia * Method/Device: Field measurement * Comment: Obtained: end of August 2021
Tigray_Adi_Dawro_Hagereselam_1 * Latitude: 13.634600 * Longitude: 39.162600 * Location: Africa, Ethiopia * Method/Device: Field measurement * Comment: Obtained: end of August 2021
Comment:
Selection criteria of monitored croplands:
Rainfed farmland
No irrigation
No buildings on the land, no iron sheets!
No trees on the land
Crop should be homogeneous
At least 30 m x 30 m
Border of two lands with similar conditions is acceptable
No intercropping (hamfets is allowed)
Record coordinates in the middle of the homogeneous land
Considering all sites, there should be variability in crop types and in locations
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1Event labelEventNyssen, Jan
2Area/localityAreaNyssen, Jan
3LocationLocationNyssen, JanWoreda (district)
4UTM Easting, Universal Transverse MercatorUTM eastmNyssen, Jan
5UTM Northing, Universal Transverse MercatorUTM northmNyssen, Jan
6UTM Zone, Universal Transverse MercatorUTM ZoneNyssen, Jan
7LATITUDELatitudeNyssen, JanGeocode – WGS84
8LONGITUDELongitudeNyssen, JanGeocode – WGS84
9ALTITUDEAltitudemNyssen, JanGeocode
10CropCropNyssen, JanField observationCrop type
11CropCropNyssen, JanField observationCrop stand
12EnvironmentEnvironmentNyssen, JanField observationNearby farmlands
Status:
Curation Level: Enhanced curation (CurationLevelC)
Size:
1286 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML