Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Pausch, Franziska; Koch, Florian; Hassler, Christel S; Bracher, Astrid; Bischof, Kai; Trimborn, Scarlett (2022): Nitrate and silicate responses of a natural phytoplankton community from the Drake Passage to different climate change scenarios [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.942295

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
Contrasting models predict two different climate change scenarios for the Southern Ocean (SO), forecasting either less or stronger vertical mixing of the water column. To investigate the responses of SO phytoplankton to these future conditions, we sampled a natural diatom dominated (63%) community from today's relatively moderately mixed Drake Passage waters with both low availabilities of iron (Fe) and light. The phytoplankton community was then incubated at these ambient open ocean conditions (low Fe and low light, moderate mixing treatment), representing a control treatment. In addition, the phytoplankton was grown under two future mixing scenarios based on current climate model predictions. Mixing was simulated by changes in light and Fe availabilities. The two future scenarios consisted of a low mixing scenario (low Fe and higher light, low mixing treatment) and a strong mixing scenario (high Fe and low light, strong mixing treatment). In addition, communities of each mixing scenario were exposed to ambient and low pH, the latter simulating ocean acidification (OA). The effects of the scenarios on particulate organic carbon (POC) production, trace metal to carbon ratios, photophysiology and the relative numerical contribution of diatoms and nanoflagellates were assessed. During the first growth phase, at ambient pH both future mixing scenarios promoted the numerical abundance of diatoms (~75%) relative to nanoflagellates. This positive effect, however, vanished in response to OA in the communities of both future mixing scenarios (~65%), with different effects for their productivity. At the end of the experiment, diatoms remained numerically the most abundant phytoplankton group across all treatments (~80%). In addition, POC production was increased in the two future mixing scenarios under OA. Overall, this study suggests a continued numerical dominance of diatoms as well as higher carbon fixation in response to both future mixing scenarios under OA, irrespective of different changes in light and Fe availability.
Keyword(s):
CO2; diatoms; iron; Light; mixing; Multiple stressors; Ocean acidification; pH; Southern Ocean
Supplement to:
Pausch, Franziska; Koch, Florian; Hassler, Christel S; Bracher, Astrid; Bischof, Kai; Trimborn, Scarlett (2022): Responses of a Natural Phytoplankton Community From the Drake Passage to Two Predicted Climate Change Scenarios. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 759501, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.759501
Related to:
Pausch, Franziska; Koch, Florian; Hassler, Christel S; Bracher, Astrid; Bischof, Kai; Trimborn, Scarlett (2022): Responses of a natural phytoplankton community from the Drake Passage to two predicted climate change scenarios. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.942289
Funding:
Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HGF), grant/award no. VH-NG-901: Young Investigators Group EcoTrace
Coverage:
Latitude: -59.000000 * Longitude: -61.000000
Event(s):
DrakePassage * Latitude: -59.000000 * Longitude: -61.000000 * Campaign: compiled data
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
Incubation durationInc durdaysPausch, Franziska
Experimental treatmentExp treatPausch, Franziska
Nitrate[NO3]-µmol/lPausch, Franziska
Nitrate, standard deviationNO3 std dev±Pausch, Franziska
SilicateSi(OH)4µmol/lPausch, Franziska
Silicate, standard deviationSi(OH)4 std dev±Pausch, Franziska
Status:
Curation Level: Enhanced curation (CurationLevelC)
Size:
343 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:


Inc dur [days]

Exp treat

[NO3]- [µmol/l]

NO3 std dev [±]

Si(OH)4 [µmol/l]

Si(OH)4 std dev [±]
0Moderate mixing ambient pH23.970.0516.600.03
6Moderate mixing ambient pH24.590.4614.830.50
8Moderate mixing ambient pH24.770.7415.150.22
11Moderate mixing ambient pH24.531.4216.813.56
13Moderate mixing ambient pH22.340.5813.350.91
16Moderate mixing ambient pH22.920.4015.270.64
18Moderate mixing ambient pH24.070.4315.252.34
20Moderate mixing ambient pH22.620.1012.671.06
26Moderate mixing ambient pH21.151.0210.211.96
0Low mixing ambient pH23.970.0516.600.03
3Low mixing ambient pH23.940.25
6Low mixing ambient pH22.920.6614.870.84
8Low mixing ambient pH21.950.4915.380.25
11Low mixing ambient pH19.302.639.370.81
12Low mixing ambient pH17.810.458.400.64
16Low mixing ambient pH22.290.6912.631.31
18Low mixing ambient pH21.110.1812.032.19
20Low mixing ambient pH18.020.639.302.76
21Low mixing ambient pH6.140.83
22Low mixing ambient pH16.900.68
0Strong mixing ambient pH23.970.0516.600.03
3Strong mixing ambient pH23.980.3817.831.02
6Strong mixing ambient pH15.721.10
8Strong mixing ambient pH24.590.4413.780.58
11Strong mixing ambient pH23.431.1013.280.32
13Strong mixing ambient pH22.170.6012.900.67
16Strong mixing ambient pH23.660.0316.472.58
18Strong mixing ambient pH21.620.5215.950.48
20Strong mixing ambient pH22.110.2013.720.97
26Strong mixing ambient pH20.251.039.471.03
0Moderate mixing OA23.970.0516.600.03
3Moderate mixing OA25.070.5218.260.70
6Moderate mixing OA16.840.62
8Moderate mixing OA24.410.6115.840.70
11Moderate mixing OA23.630.9014.720.65
13Moderate mixing OA22.600.6014.040.66
16Moderate mixing OA23.770.6814.460.19
18Moderate mixing OA21.650.4815.610.57
20Moderate mixing OA22.550.4413.380.47
28Moderate mixing OA19.721.698.241.41
0Low mixing OA23.970.0516.600.03
3Low mixing OA24.480.3418.220.91
6Low mixing OA14.260.20
8Low mixing OA22.320.3212.950.74
11Low mixing OA17.870.7410.321.13
12Low mixing OA18.392.189.301.15
16Low mixing OA22.831.1813.340.26
18Low mixing OA19.710.1413.080.09
20Low mixing OA19.660.3311.791.29
22Low mixing OA7.280.88
23Low mixing OA17.351.21
0Strong mixing OA23.970.0516.600.03
3Strong mixing OA17.20
6Strong mixing OA23.350.3116.110.45
8Strong mixing OA25.020.9915.721.07
11Strong mixing OA16.071.55
13Strong mixing OA24.660.3614.450.31
16Strong mixing OA23.241.0415.350.95
18Strong mixing OA22.710.63
20Strong mixing OA22.820.1913.070.91
28Strong mixing OA20.131.0210.771.01