Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Vollmar, Nele Manon; Baumann, Karl-Heinz; Saavedra-Pellitero, Mariem; Hernández-Almeida, Iván (2021): Morphotype counts, morphometrical measurements and mass estimations on Emiliania huxleyi coccoliths from surface sediment samples in the Drake Passage based on SEM images [dataset bundled publication]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.938165

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
We studied the distribution of coccoliths in surface sediments across the Drake Passage and calcification of Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes in surface sediment samples retrieved during PS97.
Dataset 1 (morphometrical measurements and mass estimations) is reporting the morphometrical measurements of E. huxleyi coccoliths measured with the Coccobiom2 macro (Coccobiom2 macros: http://ina.tmsoc.org/nannos/coccobiom/Usernotes.html, last access: 3 September 2016) based on 570 Scanning Electron Microscope images (showing E. huxleyi coccoliths of morphotypes A, Aovercalcified, B/C and O), and calcite mass estimations based on two different formulas 1) after Beuvier et al. 2019 (doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08635-x) and 2) after Young and Ziveri 2000 (doi:10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00003-5). The morphometrical measurements (in µm) include coccolith distal shield length, distal shield width, Central Area length, Central Area width. The mass estimations (in pg) include the mass calculated after 1) and 2) and the respective shape factor used for 2). The coccoliths stem from surface sediments that were sampled with a Multicorer and are approximately of Mid to Late Holocene Age.
Dataset 2 (morphotype counts) is reporting the relative number of E. huxleyi morphotypes per sample, based on an additional count with the SEM. Further details in the material and methods section in the corresponding paper.
Keyword(s):
coccolith; coccolith mass; Drake Passage; E. huxleyi; Emiliania huxleyi; Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes; mass; mass and number size distribution; morphology; Morphometry; Southern Ocean; Surface sediment
Supplement to:
Vollmar, Nele Manon; Baumann, Karl-Heinz; Saavedra-Pellitero, Mariem; Hernández-Almeida, Iván (2022): Distribution of coccoliths in surface sediments across the Drake Passage and calcification of Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes. Biogeosciences, 19(3), 585-612, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-585-2022
Further details:
Beuvier, T; Probert, Ian; Beaufort, Luc; Suchéras-Marx, Baptiste; Chushkin, Y; Zontone, F; Gibaud, A (2019): X-ray nanotomography of coccolithophores reveals that coccolith mass and segment number correlate with grid size. Nature Communications, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08635-x
Young, Jeremy R; Ziveri, Patrizia (2000): Calculation of coccolith volume and it use in calibration of carbonate flux estimates. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 47(9-11), 1679-1700, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00003-5
Funding:
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn (DFG), grant/award no. 399488049: ADAPTation of COCCOlithophore communities to environmental change in the Southern Ocean (ADAPT-COCCO)
Coverage:
Median Latitude: -57.042842 * Median Longitude: -68.219025 * South-bound Latitude: -62.498830 * West-bound Longitude: -75.706830 * North-bound Latitude: -52.442330 * East-bound Longitude: -56.341500
Date/Time Start: 2016-02-24T22:16:00 * Date/Time End: 2016-04-03T02:42:00
Size:
2 datasets

Download Data

Download ZIP file containing all datasets as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding: