Shin, Jinhwa; Nehrbass-Ahles, Christoph; Grilli, Roberto; Beeman, Jai Chowdhry; Parrenin, Frédéric; Teste, Grégory; Landais, Amaëlle; Schmidely, Loïc; Silva, Lucas; Schmitt, Jochen; Bereiter, Bernhard; Stocker, Thomas F; Fischer, Hubertus; Chappellaz, Jérôme A (2021): Amospheric carbon dioxide of the Marine Isotope Stage 6 period (190-135 ka) from the EPICA Dome C ice core [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.929680
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Abstract:
We measured 177 new data points of atmospheric CO2 concentrations from the EPICA Dome C (EDC) ice core (75°06'S, 123°24'E) spanning MIS 6 (190 to 135 kyr BP) at the Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (IGE), France and Climate and Environmental Physics (CEP), Physics Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland. The majority of all atmospheric CO2 samples (i.e. 150) were measured using the ball mill dry-extraction system which is coupled to a gas chromatograph at IGE (Schaefer et al., 2011). We measured 65 samples from 27 depth intervals using the Centrifugal Ice Microtome (CIM) (Bereiter et al., 2013) at CEP. This new CO2 data measured within the scope of this study is complemented with two published datasets (Lourantou et al., 2010; Schneider et al., 2013) and one unpublished CO2 dataset measured in 2003. We use all of the available data from the EDC ice core to compile a composite dataset of atmospheric CO2 covering MIS 6 in doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.929693.
Related to:
Shin, Jinhwa; Nehrbass-Ahles, Christoph; Grilli, Roberto; Beeman, Jai Chowdhry; Parrenin, Frédéric; Teste, Grégory; Landais, Amaëlle; Schmidely, Loïc; Silva, Lucas; Schmitt, Jochen; Bereiter, Bernhard; Stocker, Thomas F; Fischer, Hubertus; Chappellaz, Jérôme A (2020): Millennial-scale atmospheric CO2 variations during the Marine Isotope Stage 6 period (190–135 ka). Climate of the Past, 16(6), 2203-2219, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020
Source:
Lourantou, Anna; Chappellaz, Jérôme A; Barnola, Jean-Marc; Masson-Delmotte, Valerie; Raynaud, Dominique (2010): Changes in atmospheric CO2 and its carbon isotopic ratio during the penultimate deglaciation. Quaternary Science Reviews, 29(17-18), 1983-1992, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002
Schneider, Robert; Schmitt, Jochen; Koehler, Peter; Joos, Fortunat; Fischer, Hubertus (2013): A reconstruction of atmospheric carbon dioxide and its stable carbon isotopic composition from the penultimate glacial maximum to the glacial inception. Climate of the Past, 9(6), 2507-2523, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013
Other version:
Shin, Jinhwa; Nehrbass-Ahles, Christoph; Grilli, Roberto; Beeman, Jai Chowdhry; Parrenin, Frédéric; Teste, Grégory; Landais, Amaëlle; Schmidely, Loïc; Silva, Lucas; Schmitt, Jochen; Bereiter, Bernhard; Stocker, Thomas F; Fischer, Hubertus; Chappellaz, Jérôme A (2021): Amospheric carbon dioxide of the Marine Isotope Stage 6 period (190-135 ka) from the EPICA Dome C ice core: composite record. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.929693
Shin, Jinhwa; Nehrbass-Ahles, Christoph; Grilli, Roberto; Beeman, Jai Chowdhry; Parrenin, Frédéric; Teste, Grégory; Landais, Amaëlle; Schmidely, Loïc; Silva, Lucas; Schmitt, Jochen; Bereiter, Bernhard; Stocker, Thomas F; Fischer, Hubertus; Chappellaz, Jérôme A (2021): Amospheric carbon dioxide of the Marine Isotope Stage 6 period (190-135 ka) from the EPICA Dome C ice core: composite smoothed record. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.929694
Further details:
Bereiter, Bernhard; Stocker, Thomas F; Fischer, H (2013): A centrifugal ice microtome for measurements of atmospheric CO2 on air trapped in polar ice cores. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 6(2), 251-262, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-251-2013
Schaefer, Hinrich; Lourantou, Anna; Chappellaz, Jérôme A; Lüthi, Dieter; Bereiter, Bernhard; Barnola, Jean-Marc (2011): On the suitability of partially clathrated ice for analysis of concentration and d13C of palaeo-atmospheric CO2. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 307(3-4), 334-340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.05.007
Project(s):
Funding:
Fifth Framework Programme (FP5), grant/award no. EVK2-CT-2000-00077: European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica
Fourth Framework Programme (FP4), grant/award no. ENV4980702: European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica
Coverage:
Latitude: -75.100000 * Longitude: 123.350000
Date/Time Start: 1993-01-01T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2004-12-31T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, ice/snow: 1669.2500 m * Maximum DEPTH, ice/snow: 2036.5675 m
Event(s):
EDC (EPICA Dome C) * Latitude: -75.100000 * Longitude: 123.350000 * Date/Time Start: 1993-01-01T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2004-12-31T00:00:00 * Elevation: 3233.0 m * Recovery: 3300 m * Location: Dome C, Antarctica * Campaign: Dome C * Method/Device: Ice drill (ICEDRILL) * Comment: Drill site is 56 km from the site of a previous Dome C core that provided records extending into the last glacial period, and 560 km from the site of the Vostok cores. The completion of the Dome C core was delayed when the first drilling became stuck at 788 m in 1999 (EDC96).
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, ice/snow | Depth ice/snow | m | Shin, Jinhwa | Geocode | |
| 2 | AGE | Age | ka BP | Shin, Jinhwa | Geocode | |
| 3 | Carbon dioxide | CO2 | ppmv | Shin, Jinhwa | see description in data abstract | |
| 4 | Carbon dioxide, standard deviation | CO2 std dev | ± | Shin, Jinhwa | see description in data abstract | |
| 5 | Replicates | Repl | # | Shin, Jinhwa | ||
| 6 | Description | Description | Shin, Jinhwa | |||
| 7 | Reference/source | Reference | Shin, Jinhwa | |||
| 8 | Uniform resource locator/link to reference | URL ref | Shin, Jinhwa |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-4.0)
Size:
1310 data points
Data
| 1 Depth ice/snow [m] | 2 Age [ka BP] | 3 CO2 [ppmv] | 4 CO2 std dev [±] | 5 Repl [#] | 6 Description | 7 Reference | 8 URL ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1787.6275 | 135.2700000 | 198.300 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1791.6250 | 135.9600000 | 196.800 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1801.6875 | 137.8500000 | 192.500 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1812.4675 | 140.1100000 | 185.200 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1815.1275 | 140.6500000 | 184.800 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1815.5225 | 140.7400000 | 186.500 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1817.8775 | 141.2700000 | 186.200 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1819.9775 | 141.7600000 | 195.400 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1823.7725 | 142.6300000 | 188.000 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1825.4775 | 143.0100000 | 191.900 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1827.6225 | 143.5000000 | 190.900 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1828.8775 | 143.7700000 | 189.900 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1829.1875 | 143.8300000 | 187.800 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1833.1225 | 144.6100000 | 191.400 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1834.7725 | 144.9200000 | 192.000 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1836.4775 | 145.2400000 | 192.500 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1838.6225 | 145.6500000 | 188.000 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1841.3725 | 146.2200000 | 192.200 | 3.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1845.7725 | 147.1600000 | 189.900 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1851.1825 | 148.3100000 | 193.200 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1856.3775 | 149.4000000 | 193.600 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1856.7725 | 149.4800000 | 193.100 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1858.4225 | 149.8300000 | 194.700 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1860.6225 | 150.3000000 | 199.100 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1868.9275 | 151.9500000 | 195.500 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1872.8775 | 152.7600000 | 191.200 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1873.2725 | 152.8400000 | 193.000 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1874.1250 | 153.0200000 | 192.100 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1877.1225 | 153.6100000 | 190.700 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1878.7725 | 153.8900000 | 188.900 | 1.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1883.8275 | 154.9300000 | 186.100 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1884.2725 | 155.0300000 | 185.800 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1888.1225 | 155.8900000 | 183.900 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1888.1775 | 155.9000000 | 183.700 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1888.6725 | 156.0300000 | 180.400 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1889.7725 | 156.3500000 | 179.800 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1890.9275 | 156.7300000 | 182.400 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1894.2275 | 157.5600000 | 182.900 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1894.8275 | 157.6800000 | 183.000 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1895.2725 | 157.7700000 | 183.600 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1895.8225 | 157.9000000 | 182.600 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1896.9775 | 158.1700000 | 185.200 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1897.4725 | 158.2900000 | 185.500 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1898.6275 | 158.5600000 | 187.400 | 2.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1899.0675 | 158.6600000 | 185.400 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1900.3775 | 158.9600000 | 184.100 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1900.7725 | 159.0500000 | 186.100 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1901.3775 | 159.1900000 | 188.900 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1901.8175 | 159.2800000 | 188.700 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1904.6225 | 159.8500000 | 193.300 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1905.8325 | 160.0900000 | 195.300 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1906.2725 | 160.1800000 | 193.600 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1907.4400 | 160.4000000 | 201.200 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1910.6725 | 161.0000000 | 201.000 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1911.7725 | 161.2400000 | 194.300 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1912.8725 | 161.4900000 | 195.400 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1914.4725 | 161.9000000 | 192.600 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1916.2275 | 162.3300000 | 192.800 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1917.2725 | 162.5900000 | 187.500 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1918.3600 | 162.8800000 | 188.800 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1919.5275 | 163.1500000 | 191.700 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1919.9425 | 163.2400000 | 191.700 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1921.7275 | 163.6200000 | 196.100 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1922.7725 | 163.8300000 | 193.900 | 1.50 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1924.4225 | 164.1700000 | 196.800 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1925.0775 | 164.3000000 | 196.500 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1925.5225 | 164.3900000 | 194.700 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1926.1275 | 164.5100000 | 194.600 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1927.2275 | 164.7100000 | 196.200 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1928.2725 | 164.9300000 | 189.100 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1929.3725 | 165.1700000 | 190.900 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1932.1225 | 165.8300000 | 185.200 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1933.7725 | 166.2200000 | 182.800 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1936.0875 | 166.8300000 | 183.800 | 2.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1938.1725 | 167.4100000 | 181.600 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1939.2725 | 167.7200000 | 183.500 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1940.3725 | 168.0200000 | 182.700 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1942.6275 | 168.5500000 | 189.100 | 1.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1943.0675 | 168.6600000 | 187.300 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1944.3275 | 168.9400000 | 192.400 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1944.7725 | 169.0300000 | 184.700 | 1.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1945.9275 | 169.2900000 | 192.300 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1947.0575 | 169.5300000 | 198.700 | 1.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1948.6225 | 169.8300000 | 197.900 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1949.8275 | 169.9800000 | 194.400 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1950.2725 | 170.0300000 | 195.800 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1951.9775 | 170.2800000 | 196.300 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1954.6725 | 170.8800000 | 194.000 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1955.7725 | 171.1700000 | 189.500 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1956.8725 | 171.4400000 | 192.200 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1958.0700 | 171.7300000 | 194.000 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1960.1725 | 172.2200000 | 187.800 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1961.2725 | 172.4800000 | 186.200 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1962.4400 | 172.7600000 | 181.600 | 2.50 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1964.6275 | 173.2900000 | 193.400 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1965.0675 | 173.4000000 | 193.700 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1966.7725 | 173.8200000 | 192.000 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1967.8725 | 174.0800000 | 194.800 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1972.3275 | 175.0600000 | 192.800 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1973.4400 | 175.3300000 | 189.800 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1976.7275 | 176.0700000 | 188.300 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1977.7225 | 176.3000000 | 187.000 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1978.3225 | 176.4300000 | 186.800 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1978.9275 | 176.5700000 | 185.700 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1979.4225 | 176.6800000 | 182.900 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1980.0775 | 176.8200000 | 183.800 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1980.5225 | 176.9200000 | 182.500 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1981.1275 | 177.0500000 | 184.500 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1981.5675 | 177.1400000 | 181.100 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1982.2275 | 177.2800000 | 184.800 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1983.2725 | 177.5100000 | 182.300 | 1.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1984.3725 | 177.7600000 | 184.600 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1985.5575 | 178.0400000 | 187.600 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1987.1275 | 178.4400000 | 183.600 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1988.3775 | 178.7600000 | 184.100 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1988.7725 | 178.8600000 | 187.600 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1989.8725 | 179.1200000 | 187.900 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1992.6775 | 179.7300000 | 198.000 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1993.1725 | 179.8300000 | 197.400 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1993.8275 | 179.9600000 | 202.200 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1994.2725 | 180.0500000 | 201.300 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1995.3175 | 180.2400000 | 204.900 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1998.1225 | 180.7400000 | 205.400 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1999.7725 | 181.0500000 | 208.500 | 1.50 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2000.9275 | 181.2700000 | 211.700 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2001.4225 | 181.3300000 | 207.600 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2004.2275 | 181.9200000 | 203.200 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2005.2725 | 182.1700000 | 199.300 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2006.3725 | 182.4500000 | 195.200 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2007.4750 | 182.7100000 | 196.900 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2010.3275 | 183.3600000 | 196.900 | 2.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2010.7725 | 183.4600000 | 193.900 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2012.4775 | 183.8200000 | 194.800 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2014.6225 | 184.2900000 | 188.800 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2015.8675 | 184.5700000 | 193.100 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2017.4400 | 184.9300000 | 196.200 | 2.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2017.9100 | 185.0400000 | 193.600 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2019.6275 | 185.4200000 | 195.100 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2020.0675 | 185.5200000 | 195.100 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2021.3325 | 185.7900000 | 189.200 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2022.8725 | 186.1100000 | 196.200 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2025.1275 | 186.5100000 | 197.600 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2025.5675 | 186.6000000 | 197.900 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2026.7775 | 186.8800000 | 200.500 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2032.7725 | 188.2400000 | 207.100 | 1.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2033.9275 | 188.4900000 | 215.500 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2034.4225 | 188.6000000 | 215.900 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2035.1275 | 188.7500000 | 217.000 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2036.1275 | 188.9500000 | 220.000 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 2036.5675 | 189.0400000 | 222.900 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Ball mill at IGE | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | |
| 1785.2300 | 135.0400000 | 207.600 | 0.20 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1788.6700 | 135.4500000 | 204.700 | 0.10 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1794.5800 | 136.5200000 | 199.900 | 0.50 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1797.7300 | 137.1000000 | 199.300 | 0.30 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1807.2300 | 139.0100000 | 194.500 | 0.50 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1814.0400 | 140.4300000 | 191.700 | 1.00 | 3 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1821.6700 | 142.1500000 | 199.800 | 2.10 | 4 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1852.5400 | 148.6000000 | 198.600 | 0.60 | 3 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1867.7300 | 151.7200000 | 201.000 | 1.70 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1888.2200 | 155.9100000 | 188.900 | 1.00 | 4 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1890.9700 | 156.7400000 | 184.900 | 0.50 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1904.5800 | 159.8400000 | 197.900 | 0.40 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1907.5400 | 160.4200000 | 202.500 | 0.50 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1925.4600 | 164.3800000 | 201.200 | 1.50 | 4 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1929.3300 | 165.1600000 | 195.800 | 0.20 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1939.2100 | 167.7000000 | 188.500 | 0.70 | 3 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1943.1400 | 168.6700000 | 190.200 | 0.50 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1945.9700 | 169.3000000 | 197.200 | 0.80 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1950.2300 | 170.0300000 | 200.100 | 0.90 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1961.2300 | 172.4700000 | 194.100 | 0.20 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1967.8300 | 174.0700000 | 200.000 | 0.20 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1977.6300 | 176.2800000 | 192.900 | 1.20 | 4 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1980.4800 | 176.9100000 | 189.800 | 0.80 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1998.0800 | 180.7400000 | 210.200 | 0.20 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 2000.9700 | 181.2700000 | 216.200 | 1.00 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 2016.2300 | 184.6500000 | 198.900 | 0.60 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 2033.9700 | 188.5000000 | 222.700 | 1.40 | 2 | CO2 data from Dome C using CIM at Univ.Bern | This study | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 |
| 1793.5200 | 136.3170227 | 208.100 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1799.5900 | 137.4527480 | 200.700 | 0.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1805.0650 | 138.5557852 | 197.500 | 1.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1810.0350 | 139.6014132 | 195.000 | 0.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1821.0050 | 141.9947167 | 199.300 | 0.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1826.5750 | 143.2612024 | 197.300 | 0.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1832.0750 | 144.4014504 | 195.800 | 0.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1837.5750 | 145.4511912 | 194.500 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1848.5350 | 147.7498130 | 196.700 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1854.0350 | 148.9082114 | 200.200 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1859.5350 | 150.0718119 | 204.900 | 2.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1865.0350 | 151.1798959 | 209.300 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1876.0400 | 153.3960733 | 198.500 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1881.5350 | 154.4604549 | 195.500 | 1.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1887.0350 | 155.6463154 | 190.600 | 1.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1892.5350 | 157.1348606 | 189.600 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1903.5350 | 159.6290205 | 197.700 | 0.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1909.0350 | 160.6965640 | 206.100 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1914.5350 | 161.9163106 | 200.900 | 1.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1920.0350 | 163.2612876 | 199.200 | 2.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1931.0350 | 165.5664503 | 195.600 | 0.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1936.5250 | 166.9486916 | 187.300 | 1.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1942.0350 | 168.4132077 | 192.800 | 0.50 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1947.5350 | 169.6225842 | 205.500 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1958.5350 | 171.8377748 | 198.500 | 0.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1964.0350 | 173.1439643 | 197.000 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1969.5350 | 174.4464019 | 203.600 | 0.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1975.0400 | 175.6898174 | 195.800 | 0.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1986.0350 | 178.1634350 | 194.800 | 0.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1991.5350 | 179.4853552 | 208.300 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1997.0350 | 180.5484646 | 211.300 | 0.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 2002.5250 | 181.5596055 | 212.900 | 0.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 2013.5350 | 184.0504369 | 202.100 | 0.90 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 2015.5500 | 184.4952217 | 203.300 | 0.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 2024.5350 | 186.4028541 | 202.100 | 0.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using Needle cracker at Univ.Bern in 2003 | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2203-2020 | ||
| 1799.4600 | 137.4300000 | 197.900 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | ||
| 1804.6300 | 138.4600000 | 197.300 | 1.08 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | |
| 1809.5800 | 139.5100000 | 191.600 | 0.19 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | |
| 1820.6700 | 141.9200000 | 195.300 | 0.95 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | |
| 1826.3900 | 143.2200000 | 193.300 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | ||
| 1831.7300 | 144.3300000 | 194.700 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | ||
| 1837.3900 | 145.4200000 | 192.300 | 0.64 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | |
| 1848.0300 | 147.6400000 | 194.500 | 4.05 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | |
| 1853.9100 | 148.8800000 | 200.400 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | ||
| 1859.3800 | 150.0400000 | 201.200 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | ||
| 1864.5600 | 151.0900000 | 201.000 | 1.86 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | |
| 1875.9000 | 153.3700000 | 197.500 | 1.73 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | |
| 1881.0700 | 154.3600000 | 195.000 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | ||
| 1886.9500 | 155.6300000 | 188.200 | CO2 data from Dome C using Sublimation at Univ.Bern | Schneider et al. (2013) | https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2507-2013 | ||
| 1669.2500 | 124.8600000 | 277.600 | 0.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1674.7500 | 125.3300000 | 275.600 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1674.7500 | 125.3300000 | 278.500 | 2.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1677.5000 | 125.5600000 | 271.700 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1680.2500 | 125.8100000 | 272.600 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1685.7500 | 126.3100000 | 273.500 | 2.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1691.2500 | 126.7400000 | 267.200 | 2.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1696.7500 | 127.0800000 | 271.600 | 1.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1702.2500 | 127.5000000 | 274.800 | 1.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1705.0000 | 127.6600000 | 277.300 | 3.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1707.7500 | 127.8300000 | 287.500 | 5.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1713.2500 | 128.1700000 | 290.200 | -6.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1718.7500 | 128.5100000 | 290.500 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1724.2500 | 128.8800000 | 269.400 | 1.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1729.7500 | 129.2500000 | 264.800 | 3.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1732.5000 | 129.4400000 | 262.000 | 1.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1735.2500 | 129.6600000 | 263.400 | 1.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1740.7500 | 130.0300000 | 261.700 | 3.30 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1744.0500 | 130.2500000 | 256.200 | 1.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1749.5500 | 130.6800000 | 250.600 | 2.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1755.0500 | 131.1500000 | 243.200 | 1.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1760.0000 | 131.7000000 | 237.900 | 1.60 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1766.0500 | 132.4300000 | 231.300 | 0.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1771.5500 | 133.0700000 | 225.300 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1773.7500 | 133.3600000 | 221.500 | 1.50 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1779.2500 | 134.0700000 | 210.500 | 2.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1784.7500 | 134.9700000 | 205.700 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1787.5000 | 135.3900000 | 204.300 | 1.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1790.2500 | 135.7300000 | 199.600 | 2.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1790.2500 | 135.7300000 | 199.000 | 0.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1795.7500 | 136.7300000 | 193.500 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1801.2500 | 137.7600000 | 196.800 | 2.00 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1806.7500 | 138.9100000 | 191.100 | 2.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1812.2500 | 140.0700000 | 186.400 | 1.70 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1815.0000 | 140.6200000 | 184.100 | 4.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1821.0500 | 142.0100000 | 193.100 | 1.80 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1867.3000 | 151.6000000 | 200.600 | 1.10 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1870.0000 | 152.2000000 | 202.960 | 2.20 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 | |
| 1872.8000 | 152.7000000 | 197.170 | 1.40 | CO2 data from Dome C using ball mill at IGE | Lourantou et al. (2010) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.002 |