Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Sha, Zongyao; Bai, Yongfei; Li, Ruren; Lan, Hai; Zhang, Xueliang; Li, Jonathon; Liu, Xuefeng; Xie, Yichun (2021): The global carbon sink potential of terrestrial vegetation can be increased substantially by optimal land management [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.926334

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX Citation

Abstract:
It is well agreed that massive emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), particularly that from carbon dioxide (CO2), have been driving and will continue to drive global climate changes, one of which is global warming. Traditional measures by cutting carbon emissions are not enough; we need to find ways to sink more carbon from the atmosphere. Land management practices (LMPs) have massive effect on carbon sequestration from vegetation. Optimal land management practices (OLMPs) refer to LMPs that are capable of a higher, if not the highest, target carbon sequestration level given the current climatic and non-climatic conditions. Carbon sequestration potential, which is termed as carbon gap, is the difference in carbon sequestration with- and without- OLMPs.
This dataset presents the carbon gap computed on the basis of implementing the OLMPs identified within a 20km local neighborhood under the same conditions in terms of landforms, vegetation biomes and soil profiles. We show that globally an extra of 13.73 PgC per year could be sequestered if OLMPs are implemented.
This datasets include an image file Carbongap_2km.tif, the averaged global carbon gap flux for the years 2001-2018, and a number of statistical sheets related to the carbon gap.
Keyword(s):
carbon gap; carbon sequestration; Climate changes; Vegetation
Related to:
Sha, Zongyao; Bai, Yongfei; Li, Ruren; Lan, Hai; Zhang, Xueliang; Li, Jonathon; Liu, Xuefeng; Chang, S; Xie, Yichun (2022): The global carbon sink potential of terrestrial vegetation can be increased substantially by optimal land management. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00333-1
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
File contentContentSha, Zongyao
Binary ObjectBinarySha, Zongyao
Status:
Curation Level: Basic curation (CurationLevelB)
Size:
22 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

All files referred to in data matrix can be downloaded in one go as ZIP or TAR. Be careful: This download can be very large! To protect our systems from misuse, we require to sign up for an user account before downloading.


Content

Binary
Carbon gap (the potential space that carbon sequestration could be further improved) flux at resolution 2km, unit gC/m2/yearCarbongap_2km.tif
(for Fig. 4) Accumulative total carbon gap against accumulative total vegetated areacarbongap_area_distribution_wld.csv
Carbon gap flux for each IGBP land (vegetation) cover type (gC/m2/year) in each continent/regioncontinent_carbongap_flux.csv
Total carbon gap (gC/year) for each continent/region in each yearcontinent_carbongap_total.csv
Vegetated area (m2) based on IGBP land (vegetation) cover type in each continent/regioncontinent_landclass_area.csv
Vegetation NPP for each IGBP land (vegetation) cover type (gC/m2/year) in each continent/regioncontinent_npp_flux.csv
Total NPP (gC/year) for each continent/region in each yearcontinent_npp_total.csv
Data used to decide optimal window size, which is ~20km.optimal_window_size.csv
Percentile carbongap npp populationPercentile_carbongap_npp_population.csv
Carbon gap and field data validation from Inner Mongolia, Chinanm_samples_result.csv
Python code for computing the statistics running on Google Earth Enginecode_wld_nature.py