Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Schoepf, Verena; Jung, Maria U; McCulloch, Malcolm T; White, Nicole E; Stat, Michael; Thomas, Luke (2020): Area-normalized chlorophyll a concentration for Acropora aspera corals collected from Shell Island, Kimberley, in April and November 2016 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.923612

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
Coral tissue chlorophyll a concentrations were measured to assess how corals in the Kimberley region, NW Australia, were impacted by and recovered from the 2016 mass bleaching event documented at this location. The corals were collected at Shell island (Shenton Bluff), Cygnet Bay, in both the intertidal and subtidal reef zone. Tissue samples were collected from tagged colonies of the dominant coral species at this location, Acropora aspera, in April 2016 (peak bleaching) and 7 months after peak bleaching in October 2016. The health status of all tagged colonies was assessed in April 2016 and after 7 months of recovery in November 2016 using the Coral Watch Coral Health Chart where a change of two units in brightness indicates a significant change in symbiont density and chlorophyll a content (Siebeck et al., 2006). Colonies were considered either “healthy” (brightness scale, 3.6–6) or “bleached” (brightness, 1–3.5). Corals were stored at -80°C prior to processing. To quantify bleaching, chlorophyll a concentration was determined spectrophotometrically (Jeffrey and Humphrey, 1975; doi:10.1016/S0015-3796(17)30778-3) and used as a proxy for bleaching susceptibility. Tissue was removed from a branch tip using an airbrush and separated into animal and symbiont fraction via centrifugation (2 x 10 min at 3,000 g). Chlorophyll a from the symbiont fraction was extracted in 100% acetone in the dark at 4°C for 24 h and the concentration determined spectrophotometrically (Jeffrey and Humphrey, 1975) and then standardized to surface area. Surface area was calculated using the relationship between skeletal mass (x, in g) and the respective computer tomography (CT)- determined surface area (y, in cm2) of A. aspera skeletons from our study site (y = 9.4871x0.7729, n = 6, R2 = 0.99).
Keyword(s):
bleaching surveys; coral chlorophyll a concentration; coral community composition; PAR; SST; water level
Related to:
Schoepf, Verena; Jung, Maria U; McCulloch, Malcolm T; White, Nicole E; Stat, Michael; Thomas, Luke (2020): Thermally Variable, Macrotidal Reef Habitats Promote Rapid Recovery From Mass Coral Bleaching. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00245
Coverage:
Latitude: -16.800000 * Longitude: 123.066667
Date/Time Start: 2016-04-01T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2016-10-31T00:00:00
Event(s):
Shell_Island * Latitude: -16.800000 * Longitude: 123.066667 * Date/Time Start: 2016-04-01T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2016-10-31T00:00:00 * Method/Device: Experiment (EXP)
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1Sample IDSample IDSchoepf, Verena
2Genetic lineageGen lineageSchoepf, Verena
3EnvironmentEnvironmentSchoepf, Verena
4Health categoryHealth catSchoepf, VerenaApril 2016
5Sample commentSample commentSchoepf, VerenaCoralWatch (Health chart score April 2016)
6Health statusHealth statusSchoepf, VerenaNov 2016
7Acropora aspera, chlorophyll a per surface areaA. aspera chl aµg/cm2Schoepf, VerenaApril 2016
8Acropora aspera, chlorophyll a per surface areaA. aspera chl aµg/cm2Schoepf, VerenaNov 2016
Size:
241 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML