de.pangaea.dataset892792 und dataset PANGAEA

info@pangaea.de

https://www.pangaea.de/ information pointOfContact 2026-04-30T22:22:05Z https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.892792 2018-08-02T11:14:04 publication https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.892792 Classen, Alice

alice.classen@uni-wuerzburg.de

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-8806 information author Ferger, Stefan W

stefan.ferger@yahoo.de

http://www.bik-f.de/root/index.php?page_id=433 information author Helbig-Bonitz, Maria

m.helbig-bonitz@gmx.de

http://www.uni-ulm.de/nawi/bio3/kalko/phdstud/dipl-biol-maria-helbig-bonitz.html information author Peters, Marcell Karl

marcell.peters@uni-wuerzburg.de

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1262-0827 information author Schmack, Julia

juliaschmack@gmx.de

author Schleuning, Matthias

matthias.schleuning@senckenberg.de

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-045X information author Böhning-Gaese, Katrin

katrin.boehning-gaese@senckenberg.de

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-5586 information author Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf

ingolf.steffan@uni-wuerzburg.de

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-3944 information author PANGAEA

info@pangaea.de

https://www.pangaea.de/ information publisher tableDigital Supplement to: Classen, Alice; Peters, Marcell Karl; Ferger, Stefan W; Helbig-Bonitz, Maria; Schmack, Julia; Maassen, G; Schleuning, Matthias; Kalko, Elisabeth K V; Böhning-Gaese, Katrin; Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf (2014): Complementary ecosystem services provided by pest predators and pollinators increase quantity and quality of coffee yields. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 281(1779), 20133148-20133148, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3148 Wild animals substantially support crop production by providing ecosystem services, such as pollination and natural pest control. However, the strengths of synergies between ecosystem services and their dependencies on land-use management are largely unknown. Here, we took an experimental approach to test the impact of land-use intensification on both individual and combined pollination and pest control services in coffee production systems at Mount Kilimanjaro. We established a full-factorial pollinator and vertebrate exclosure experiment along a land-use gradient from traditional homegardens (agroforestry systems), shaded coffee plantations to sun coffee plantations (total sample size = 180 coffee bushes). The exclusion of vertebrates led to a reduction in fruit set of ca 9%. Pollinators did not affect fruit set, but significantly increased fruit weight of coffee by an average of 7.4%. We found no significant decline of these ecosystem services along the land-use gradient. Pest control and pollination service were thus complementary, contributing to coffee production by affecting the quantity and quality of a major tropical cash crop across different coffee production systems at Mount Kilimanjaro. completed Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf

ingolf.steffan@uni-wuerzburg.de

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-3944 information principalInvestigator KiLi Kilimanjaro Research Group theme 1995-01-01 creation PANGAEA

info@pangaea.de

https://www.pangaea.de/ information pointOfContact copyright copyright CC-BY-3.0: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported textTable und geoscientificInformation 37.19 37.6 -3.34 -3.19 2012-05-02T00:00:00 2012-11-30T00:00:00 1120.0 1660.0 Treatment description: Poll (Pollinator): 2 randomly selected twigs of the tree where covered with gauze during coffee blossom to exclude pollinators - two randomly selected twigs were marked as control twigs, Vert (Vertebrate Exclosure): The whole coffee tree was covered with a net to exclude vertebrates (birds and bats) - two twigs were selected, Poll/Vert: combination of Poll and Vert on one tree, Control: open control with two selected twigs. On all selected twigs we counted fruitsets and harvested the fruits for quality assessment..... Event label thematicClassification Habitat thematicClassification Plot thematicClassification ALTITUDE physicalMeasurement m m Sample ID thematicClassification Of cluster Description thematicClassification Of treatment (see, comment) Sample ID thematicClassification Of tree to identify, which berries derive from the same tree Description thematicClassification Of branch Treatment thematicClassification PollEx: The REAL Treatment (e.g. the control twig on the Pollinator-Exclosure Tree gets 0 as it was NOT covered with gauze) Treatment thematicClassification VertEx: The REAL Treatment: all Vert and Poll/Vert-Trees get 1 Number thematicClassification Of berrys: 15 Coffee berries (only red ones) randomly selected Mass physicalMeasurement The berry weight is strongly correlated to the seed weight g g Counts physicalMeasurement Of seeds. Poorly developed seeds were included in the counting # # Index thematicClassification Of peaberry = 1: yes, 0: no (sometimes only one of the two seeds is fertilized. The fertilized seed is oval (or pea-shaped)) Index thematicClassification Of size difference = 1: yes, 0: no (both seeds were developed but considerablye different in size) Presence/absence thematicClassification Coffee Berry Borer (CBB) Presence/absence thematicClassification Of any abnormalities or infestations DATE/TIME thematicClassification Of harvesting Index thematicClassification 1: yes, berry was taked from the originally marked twig, 0: Berry was harvested of the same tree but not from the originally twig (only possible for Controls). We tried to prefer original twig! text/tab-separated-values unknown https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.892792?format=textfile download dataset The data set was checked for completeness, correctness, and consistency of metainformation. Validity of used methods was checked and - if applicable - precision and range of data. EVENT LABEL: KiLi_cof2 * LATITUDE: -3.230000 * LONGITUDE: 37.270000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: a middle pole; ECOSYTEM: coffee plantation EVENT LABEL: KiLi_cof3 * LATITUDE: -3.250000 * LONGITUDE: 37.320000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: a middle pole; ECOSYTEM: coffee plantation EVENT LABEL: KiLi_cof4 * LATITUDE: -3.280000 * LONGITUDE: 37.320000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: a middle pole; ECOSYTEM: coffee plantation EVENT LABEL: KiLi_cof5 * LATITUDE: -3.280000 * LONGITUDE: 37.470000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: a middle pole; ECOSYTEM: coffee plantation; COMMENTS: destroyed EVENT LABEL: KiLi_hom1 * LATITUDE: -3.190000 * LONGITUDE: 37.260000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: a middle pole; ECOSYTEM: homegarden EVENT LABEL: KiLi_hom2 * LATITUDE: -3.270000 * LONGITUDE: 37.310000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: a middle pole; ECOSYTEM: homegarden EVENT LABEL: KiLi_hom4 * LATITUDE: -3.340000 * LONGITUDE: 37.490000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: a middle pole; ECOSYTEM: homegarden EVENT LABEL: KiLi_hom5 * LATITUDE: -3.270000 * LONGITUDE: 37.600000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: a middle pole; ECOSYTEM: homegarden EVENT LABEL: KiLi_sun1 * LATITUDE: -3.280000 * LONGITUDE: 37.190000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: cross midpoint; ECOSYTEM: sun coffee plantation EVENT LABEL: KiLi_sun2 * LATITUDE: -3.240000 * LONGITUDE: 37.270000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: cross midpoint; ECOSYTEM: sun coffee plantation EVENT LABEL: KiLi_sun3 * LATITUDE: -3.250000 * LONGITUDE: 37.330000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: cross midpoint; ECOSYTEM: sun coffee plantation EVENT LABEL: KiLi_sun4 * LATITUDE: -3.280000 * LONGITUDE: 37.320000 * LOCATION: Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania POLETYPE: cross midpoint; ECOSYTEM: sun coffee plantation Further details https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.894721 Hemp, Andreas

andreas.hemp@uni-bayreuth.de

http://www.pflanzenphysiologie.uni-bayreuth.de/pflanzenphysiologie/de/mitarbeiter/mit/mitarbeiter_detail.php?id_obj=35223 information author documentDigital