Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Rippert, Nadine; Tiedemann, Ralf (2017): Age control points of sediment core SO136-003/MD06-2990 [dataset]. Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.870410, In supplement to: Rippert, Nadine; Max, Lars; Mackensen, Andreas; Cacho, Isabel; Povea, Patricia; Tiedemann, Ralf (2017): Alternating influence of northern versus southern-sourced water masses on the equatorial Pacific subthermocline during the past 240 ka. Paleoceanography, 32(11), 1256-1274, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017PA003133

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Related to:
Ronge, Thomas A; Steph, Silke; Tiedemann, Ralf; Prange, Matthias; Merkel, Ute; Nürnberg, Dirk; Kuhn, Gerhard (2015): (Table 1) Age determination of sediment core SO136-003. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.700143
Ronge, Thomas A; Steph, Silke; Tiedemann, Ralf; Prange, Matthias; Merkel, Ute; Nürnberg, Dirk; Kuhn, Gerhard (2015): Pushing the boundaries: Glacial/interglacial variability of intermediate and deep waters in the southwest Pacific over the last 350,000 years. Paleoceanography, 30(2), 23-38, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014PA002727
Coverage:
Latitude: -42.308333 * Longitude: 169.875667
Date/Time Start: 2006-01-28T06:10:00 * Date/Time End: 2006-01-28T06:10:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.03 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 9.24 m
Event(s):
MD06-2990 (MD062990) * Latitude: -42.308333 * Longitude: 169.875667 * Date/Time: 2006-01-28T06:10:00 * Elevation: -943.5 m * Recovery: 33.55 m * Campaign: MD152 (MATACORE) * Basis: Marion Dufresne (1995) * Method/Device: Calypso Corer II (CALYPSO2) * Comment: Barrel bent above zone of penetration
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
DEPTH, sediment/rockDepth sedmTiedemann, RalfGeocode – Composite depth
AGEAgeka BPTiedemann, RalfGeocode
Age, commentCommTiedemann, RalfPointer Type
Reference/sourceReferenceTiedemann, Ralf
Size:
86 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:


Depth sed [m]

Age [ka BP]

Comm

Reference
0.033.3514C Marine04Ronge et al., 2015
0.074.5014C Marine04Ronge et al., 2015
0.159.4814C Marine04Ronge et al., 2015
0.2513.9314C Marine04Ronge et al., 2015
0.3519.3314C Marine04Ronge et al., 2015
0.7325.8514C Marine04Ronge et al., 2015
1.1338.46Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
1.2845.64Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
1.6959.48Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
1.1338.46Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
1.2845.64Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
1.6959.48Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
1.8161.62Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
2.9862.27Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
3.0163.55Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
3.2679.34Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
3.4686.42Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
3.5993.40Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
3.91105.56Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
4.05108.22Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
4.24128.65Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
4.28130.63Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
4.38136.56Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
4.60139.76Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
4.86156.01Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
5.21165.94Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
5.62185.33Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
5.76191.84Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
5.89204.31Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
6.13221.39Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
6.17227.48Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
6.21231.52Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
6.45242.92Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
6.66251.62Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
7.09268.35Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
7.35281.91Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
7.58291.43Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
8.15303.82Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
8.31307.69Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
8.51316.58Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
8.65318.69Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
9.00339.06Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study
9.24346.93Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04this study