Rippert, Nadine; Tiedemann, Ralf (2017): Age control points of ODP Site 202-1240 [dataset]. Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.870408, In supplement to: Rippert, Nadine; Max, Lars; Mackensen, Andreas; Cacho, Isabel; Povea, Patricia; Tiedemann, Ralf (2017): Alternating influence of northern versus southern-sourced water masses on the equatorial Pacific subthermocline during the past 240 ka. Paleoceanography, 32(11), 1256-1274, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017PA003133
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
Pena, Leopoldo D; Cacho, Isabel; Ferretti, Patrizia; Hall, Michael A (2008): (Table S1) Age determination of ODP Site 202-1240. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.832117
Pena, Leopoldo D; Cacho, Isabel; Ferretti, Patrizia; Hall, Michael A (2008): El Niño-Southern Oscillation-like variability during glacial terminations and interlatitudinal teleconnections. Paleoceanography, 23(3), PA3101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008PA001620
Project(s):
Coverage:
Latitude: 0.021850 * Longitude: -86.462630
Date/Time Start: 2002-05-16T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2002-05-16T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.01 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 29.39 m
Event(s):
202-1240 * Latitude: 0.021850 * Longitude: -86.462630 * Date/Time: 2002-05-16T00:00:00 * Elevation: -2920.8 m * Penetration: 613.1 m * Recovery: 622.5 m * Location: Equatorial East Pacific * Campaign: Leg202 * Basis: Joides Resolution * Method/Device: Composite Core (COMPCORE) * Comment: 65 cores; 603.7 m cored; 9.4 m drilled; 103.1 % recovery
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Tiedemann, Ralf | Geocode – Composite depth | |
| 2 | AGE | Age | ka BP | Tiedemann, Ralf | Geocode | |
| 3 | Age, comment | Comm | Tiedemann, Ralf | Pointer Type | ||
| 4 | Reference/source | Reference | Tiedemann, Ralf |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
82 data points
Data
| 1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Age [ka BP] | 3 Comm | 4 Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 | 1.91 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 0.25 | 5.27 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 0.77 | 8.90 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 1.17 | 10.54 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 1.38 | 12.79 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 1.51 | 13.32 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 1.75 | 14.60 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 2.23 | 17.22 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 2.31 | 17.33 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 2.63 | 19.41 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 2.91 | 20.88 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 3.18 | 22.26 | 14C Marine04 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 3.50 | 26.65 | 14C Fairbanks05 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 3.62 | 28.03 | 14C Fairbanks05 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 4.42 | 33.19 | 14C Fairbanks05 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 4.86 | 36.98 | 14C Fairbanks05 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 5.16 | 38.17 | 14C Fairbanks05 | Pena et al. 2008 |
| 5.65 | 44.63 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 6.43 | 49.32 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 7.59 | 52.72 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 9.81 | 64.00 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 10.21 | 75.64 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 10.91 | 80.20 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 11.39 | 87.95 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 12.72 | 109.57 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 13.74 | 118.74 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 14.09 | 126.24 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 14.89 | 130.79 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 17.35 | 155.79 | Globorotaloides hexagonus vs LR04 | this study |
| 18.53 | 166.23 | Cibicidoides d18O vs LR04 | this study |
| 18.94 | 173.24 | Globorotaloides hexagonus vs LR04 | this study |
| 20.63 | 185.53 | Globorotaloides hexagonus vs LR04 | this study |
| 22.02 | 198.82 | Globorotaloides hexagonus vs LR04 | this study |
| 22.86 | 208.38 | Globigerinoides ruber vs LR04 | this study |
| 24.44 | 217.52 | Globigerinoides ruber vs LR04 | this study |
| 24.92 | 227.40 | Globigerinoides ruber vs LR04 | this study |
| 27.08 | 250.54 | Globigerinoides ruber vs LR04 | this study |
| 27.75 | 270.39 | Globigerinoides ruber vs LR04 | this study |
| 28.64 | 291.11 | Globigerinoides ruber vs LR04 | this study |
| 29.39 | 299.34 | Globigerinoides ruber vs LR04 | this study |
| 25.71 | 235.83 | Ash layer | this study |