Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Löwemark, Ludvig (2016): Sedimentology of cores from the Iberian margin [dataset publication series]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863490, Supplement to: Löwemark, L (2001): Biogenic traces as palaeoceanographic indicators in Late Quaternary sediments from the SW Iberian margin. Berichte-Reports, Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Kiel, 14, 138 pp, https://doi.org/10.2312/reports-ifg.2001.14

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
Bioturbation in marine sediments has basically two aspects of interest for palaeo-environmental studies. First, the traces left by the burrowing organisms reflect the prevailing environmental conditions at the seafloor and thus can be used to reconstruct the ecologic and palaeoceanographic situation. Traces have the advantage over other proxies of practically always being preserved in situ. Secondly, for high- resolution stratigraphy, bioturbation is a nuisance due to the stirring and mixing processes that destroy the stratigraphic record.
In order to evaluate the applicability of biogenic traces as palaeoenvironmental indicators, a number of gravity cores from the Portuguese continental slope, covering the period from the last glacial to the present were investigated through X-ray radiographs. In addition, physical and chemical parameters were determined to define the environmental niche in each core interval. A number of traces could be recognized, the most important being: Thalassinoides, Planolites, Zoophycos, Chondrites, Scolicia, Palaeophycus, Phycosiphon and the generally pyritized traces Trichichnus and Mycellia.
The shifts between the different ichnofabrics agree strikingly well with the variations in ocean circulation caused by the changing climate.
On the upper and middle slope, variations in current intensity and oxygenation of the Mediterranean Outflow Water were responsible for shifts in the ichnofabric. Larger traces such as Planolites and Thalassinoides dominated in coarse, well oxygenated intervals, while small traces such as Chondrites and Trichichnus dominated in fine grained, poorly oxygenated intervals.
In contrast, on the lower slope where calm steady sedimentation conditions prevail, changes in sedimentation rate and nutrient flux have controlled variations in the distribution of larger traces such as Planolites, Thalassinoides, and Palaeophycus. Additionally, distinct layers of abundant Chondrites correspond to Heinrich events 1, 2, and 4, and are interpreted as a response to incursions of nutrient rich, oxygen depleted Antarctic waters during phases of reduced thermohaline circulation.
The results clearly show that not one single factor but a combination of several factors is necessary to explain the changes in ichnofabric. Furthermore, large variations in the extent and type of bioturbation and tiering between different settings clearly show that a more detailed knowledge of the factors governing bioturbation is necessary if we shall fully comprehend how proxy records are disturbed.
A first attempt to automatize a part of the recognition and quantification of the ichnofabric was performed using the DIAna image analysis program on digitized X-ray radiographs. The results show that enhanced abundance of pyritized microburrows appears to be coupled to organic rich sediments deposited under dysoxic conditions. Coarse grained sediments inhibit the formation of pyritized burrows. However, the smallest changes in program settings controlling the grey scale threshold and the sensitivity resulted in large shifts in the number of detected burrows. Therefore, this method can only be considered to be semi-quantitative.
Through AMS-^C dating of sample pairs from the Zoophycos spreiten and the surrounding host sediment, age reversals of up to 3,320 years could be demonstrated for the first time. The spreiten material is always several thousands of years younger than the surrounding host sediment. Together with detailed X-ray radiograph studies this shows that the trace maker collects the material on the seafloor, and then transports it downwards up to more than one meter in to the underlying sediment where it is deposited in distinct structures termed spreiten. This clearly shows that age reversals of several thousands of years can be expected whenever Zoophycos is unknowingly sampled.
These results also render the hitherto proposed ethological models proposed for Zoophycos as largely implausible. Therefore, a combination of detritus feeding, short time caching, and hibernation possibly combined also with gardening, is suggested here as an explanation for this complicated burrow.
Project(s):
Institute for Geosciences, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel (GIK/IfG)
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 37.192751 * Median Longitude: -8.544351 * South-bound Latitude: 36.041667 * West-bound Longitude: -10.680000 * North-bound Latitude: 41.488300 * East-bound Longitude: -7.071667
Date/Time Start: 1993-08-12T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1997-05-04T18:14:00
Event(s):
M39/1_08-3 (M39008-3) * Latitude: 36.380000 * Longitude: -7.071667 * Date/Time: 1997-04-24T14:30:00 * Elevation: -577.0 m * Recovery: 5.77 m * Campaign: M39/1 * Basis: Meteor (1986) * Method/Device: Gravity corer (Kiel type) (SL)
M39/1_16-3 (M39016-3) * Latitude: 36.778333 * Longitude: -7.703333 * Date/Time: 1997-04-26T16:08:00 * Elevation: -581.0 m * Recovery: 2.44 m * Campaign: M39/1 * Basis: Meteor (1986) * Method/Device: Gravity corer (Kiel type) (SL)
M39/1_22-4 (M39022-4) * Latitude: 36.711667 * Longitude: -8.260000 * Date/Time: 1997-04-28T18:20:00 * Elevation: -668.0 m * Recovery: 2.66 m * Campaign: M39/1 * Basis: Meteor (1986) * Method/Device: Gravity corer (Kiel type) (SL)
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
23 datasets

Download Data

Download ZIP file containing all datasets as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

Datasets listed in this publication series

  1. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core M39/1_08-3 (M39008-3). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863448
  2. Löwemark, L (2016): Digital image analysis of sediment core M39/1_08-3 (M39008-3). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864113
  3. Löwemark, L (2016): Geochemistry and grain size analyses of sediment core M39/1_08-3 (M39008-3). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864139
  4. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core M39/1_16-3 (M39016-3). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863449
  5. Löwemark, L (2016): Digital image analysis of sediment core M39/1_16-3 (M39016-3). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864114
  6. Löwemark, L (2016): Geochemistry and grain size analyses of sediment core M39/1_16-3 (M39016-3). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864140
  7. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core M39/1_22-4 (M39022-4). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863450
  8. Löwemark, L (2016): Digital image analysis of sediment core M39/1_22-4 (M39022-4). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864115
  9. Löwemark, L (2016): Geochemistry and grain size analyses of sediment core M39/1_22-4 (39022-4). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864141
  10. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core M39/1_29-4 (M39029-4). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863451
  11. Löwemark, L (2016): Geochemistry and grain size analyses of sediment core M39/1_29-4 (M39029-4). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864142
  12. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core M39/1_29-7 (M39029-7). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863452
  13. Löwemark, L (2016): Digital image analysis of sediment core M39/1_29-7 (M39029-7). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864136
  14. Löwemark, L (2016): Geochemistry and grain size analyses of sediment core M39/1_29-7 (M39029-7). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864143
  15. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core M39/1_29-8 (M39029-8). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863453
  16. Löwemark, L (2016): Geochemistry and grain size analyses of sediment core M39/1_29-8 (M39029-8). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864144
  17. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core M39/1_36-2 (M39036-2). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863454
  18. Löwemark, L (2016): Digital image analysis of sediment core M39/1_36-2 (M39036-2). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864119
  19. Löwemark, L (2016): Geochemistry and grain size analyses of sediment core M39/1_36-2 (M39036-2). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864145
  20. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core M39/1_58-2 (M39058-2). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863455
  21. Löwemark, L (2016): Geochemistry and grain size analyses of sediment core M39/1_58-2 (M39058-2). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864146
  22. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core POS200/10_21-1 (PO200-10-21-1). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863456
  23. Löwemark, L (2016): Age determination of sediment core POS200/10_28-2 (PO200-10-28-2). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.863457