Henkel, Susann; Kasten, Sabine; Poulton, Simon W; Staubwasser, Michael (2015): Geochemistry of sediment core HE337/001-1, North Sea. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.855777, Supplement to: Henkel, S et al. (2016): Determination of the stable iron isotopic composition of sequentially leached iron phases in marine sediments. Chemical Geology, 421, 93-102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.12.003
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Reactive iron (oxyhydr)oxide minerals preferentially undergo early diagenetic redox cycling which can result in the production of dissolved Fe(II), adsorption of Fe(II) onto particle surfaces, and the formation of authigenic Fe minerals. The partitioning of iron in sediments has traditionally been studied by applying sequential extractions that target operationally-defined iron phases. Here, we complement an existing sequential leaching method by developing a sample processing protocol for d56Fe analysis, which we subsequently use to study Fe phase-specific fractionation related to dissimilatory iron reduction in a modern marine sediment. Carbonate-Fe was extracted by acetate, easily reducible oxides (e.g. ferrihydrite and lepidocrocite) by hydroxylamine-HCl, reducible oxides (e.g. goethite and hematite) by dithionite-citrate, and magnetite by ammonium oxalate. Subsequently, the samples were repeatedly oxidized, heated and purified via Fe precipitation and column chromatography. The method was applied to surface sediments collected from the North Sea, south of the Island of Helgoland. The acetate-soluble fraction (targeting siderite and ankerite) showed a pronounced downcore d56Fe trend. This iron pool was most depleted in 56Fe close to the sediment-water interface, similar to trends observed for pore-water Fe(II). We interpret this pool as surface-reduced Fe(II), rather than siderite or ankerite, that was open to electron and atom exchange with the oxide surface. Common extractions using 0.5 M HCl or Na-dithionite alone may not resolve such trends, as they dissolve iron from isotopically distinct pools leading to a mixed signal. Na-dithionite leaching alone, for example, targets the sum of reducible Fe oxides that potentially differ in their isotopic fingerprint. Hence, the development of a sequential extraction Fe isotope protocol provides a new opportunity for detailed study of the behavior of iron in a wide-range of environmental settings.
Latitude: 54.084330 * Longitude: 7.915670
Date/Time Start: 2010-09-22T12:28:00 * Date/Time End: 2010-09-22T12:28:00
Datasets listed in this publication series
- Henkel, S; Kasten, S; Poulton, SW et al. (2015): Pore water Fe isotope composition of sediment core HE337/001-1. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.855774
- Henkel, S; Kasten, S; Poulton, SW et al. (2015): Pore water geochemistry of sediment core HE337/001-1. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.855773
- Henkel, S; Kasten, S; Poulton, SW et al. (2015): Solid phase geochemistry of sediment core HE337/001-1. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.855775
- Henkel, S; Kasten, S; Poulton, SW et al. (2015): Solid phase iron content and isotopic composition of sediment core HE337/001-1. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.855776