Emberley, S; Hutcheon, Ian; Shevalier, Maurice; Durocher, K; Gunter, W D; Perkins, E H (2015): Table 1. Mean geochemical values for Baseline (pre-injection) and Monitor-1 (post-injection) samples, and the percent change between the two weighted means [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.853806, Supplement to: Emberley, S et al. (2004): Geochemical monitoring of fluid-rock interaction and CO2 storage at the Weyburn CO2-injection enhanced oil recovery site, Saskatchewan, Canada. Energy, 29(9-10), 1393-1401, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.073
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Abstract:
The Weyburn Oil Field, Saskatchewan is the site of a large (5000 tonnes/day of CO2) CO2-EOR injection project By EnCana Corporation. Pre- and post-injection samples (Baseline and Monitor-1, respectively) of produced fluids from approximately 45 vertical wells were taken and chemically analyzed to determine changes in the fluid chemistry and isotope composition between August 2000 and March 2001. After 6 months of CO2 injection, geochemical parameters including pH, [HCO3], [Ca], [Mg], and d13CO2(g) point to areas in which injected CO2 dissolution and reservoir carbonate mineral dissolution have occurred. Pre-injection fluid compositions suggest that the reservoir brine in the injection area may be capable of storing as much as 100 million tonnes of dissolved CO2. Modeling of water-rock reactions show that clay minerals and feldspar, although volumetrically insignificant, may be capable of acting as pH buffers, allowing injected CO2 to be stored as bicarbonate in the formation water or as newly precipitated carbonate minerals, given favorable reaction kinetics.
Project(s):
Funding:
Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), grant/award no. 265847: Sub-seabed CO2 Storage: Impact on Marine Ecosystems
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Parameter | Parameter | Emberley, S | |||
2 | Mean, statistical | Mean | Emberley, S | Baseline | ||
3 | Sigma | Sigma | Emberley, S | Baseline | ||
4 | Mean, statistical | Mean | Emberley, S | Monitor-1 | ||
5 | Sigma | Sigma | Emberley, S | Monitor-1 | ||
6 | Change | Change | % | Emberley, S | B to M1 change - isotopic differences are measured in per mil |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
162 data points
Data
1 Parameter | 2 Mean (Baseline) | 3 Sigma (Baseline) | 4 Mean (Monitor-1) | 5 Sigma (Monitor-1) | 6 Change [%] (B to M1 change - isotopic dif...) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Calculated pH | 6.0 | 0.2 | 5.9 | 0.3 | 1.7 |
Titrated Alkalinity (mg/L) | 428.8 | 103.9 | 903.7 | 226.2 | 110.8 |
HCO3 (mg/L) | 273.8 | 77.9 | 597.7 | 148.2 | 118.3 |
S2- (ppm) | 125.3 | 81.5 | 127.0 | 63.7 | 1.4 |
TDS | 70167.4 | 13559.4 | 74875.3 | 13879.2 | 6.7 |
NH3 (mg/L) | 178.2 | 69.3 | 199.9 | 67.6 | 12.2 |
Na (mg/L) | 25166.6 | 5450.1 | 25405.7 | 4554.9 | 1.0 |
K (mg/L) | 381.9 | 128.2 | 586.7 | 165.1 | 53.7 |
Ca (mg/L) | 1371.9 | 186.0 | 1495.4 | 369.7 | 9.0 |
Mg (mg/L) | 373.8 | 27.2 | 385.5 | 30.4 | 3.1 |
Mn (mg/L) | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | -63.9 |
Li (mg/L) | 10.8 | 3.9 | 15.0 | 4.3 | 38.5 |
Fe (mg/L) | 1.3 | 0.4 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 300.4 |
Sr (mg/L) | 50.7 | 18.6 | 40.0 | 12.8 | -21.1 |
Ba (mg/L) | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 35.9 |
Si (mg/L) | 13.3 | 3.1 | 20.4 | 7.1 | 53.8 |
Cl (mg/L) | 38443.0 | 7929.8 | 41981.8 | 8350.5 | 9.2 |
SO4 (mg/L) | 3646.5 | 206.7 | 3185.3 | 262.5 | -8.1 |
d34S-SO4 | 23.2 | 2.6 | 23.0 | 2.3 | 0.1 |
d13CH4 | -52.0 | 2.6 | -51.0 | 2.2 | 1.0 |
d13CO2 | -12.7 | 2.8 | -11.6 | 2.3 | 1.1 |
d13C-HCO3 | -2.8 | 2.7 | -2.4 | 2.4 | 0.4 |
d34S-H2S(aq) | 1.2 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 0.1 |
d34S-H2S(g) | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 2.0 |
N2 (mole %) | 21.1 | 8.8 | 21.6 | 6.7 | 2.4 |
CH4 (mole %) | 43.8 | 12.6 | 51.9 | 7.8 | 18.5 |
CO2 (mole %) | 4.0 | 1.5 | 4.1 | 1.2 | 2.4 |