Pichat, Sylvain; Abouchami, Wafa; Galer, Stephen J G (2014): (Table 1) Pb isotopic composition and concentration for sediments samples of core VNTR01-8PC, ODP Site 138-849A and ashes from Chimborazo [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.839688, In supplement to: Pichat, S et al. (2014): Lead isotopes in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific record Quaternary migration of the South Westerlies. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 388, 293-305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.11.035
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Project(s):
Ocean Drilling Program (ODP)
Coverage:
Median Latitude: -0.415457 * Median Longitude: -99.938343 * South-bound Latitude: -1.466700 * West-bound Longitude: -110.518330 * North-bound Latitude: 0.183330 * East-bound Longitude: -78.816700
Date/Time Start: 1989-09-09T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1991-09-07T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.040 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 5.130 m
Event(s):
138-849 * Latitude: 0.183330 * Longitude: -110.518330 * Date/Time Start: 1991-09-07T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1991-06-12T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3839.0 m * Penetration: 791.4 m * Recovery: 777.62 m * Location: North Pacific Ocean * Campaign: Leg138 * Basis: Joides Resolution * Method/Device: Composite Core (COMPCORE) * Comment: 83 cores; 786.4 m cored; 0 m drilled; 98.9 % recovery
Cumbre_Ventimilla * Latitude: -1.466700 * Longitude: -78.816700 * Method/Device: Ice drill (ICEDRILL)
VNTR01-8PC * Latitude: 0.037000 * Longitude: -110.480000 * Date/Time: 1989-09-09T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3791.0 m * Campaign: VNTR01 * Basis: Thomas Washington * Method/Device: Piston corer (PC)
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Event label | Event | ||||
| 2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | Pichat, Sylvain | |||
| 3 | Method comment | Method comm | Pichat, Sylvain | |||
| 4 | AGE | Age | ka BP | Geocode | ||
| 5 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 6 | Lead-206/Lead-204 ratio | 206Pb/204Pb | Pichat, Sylvain | |||
| 7 | Lead-206/Lead-204 ratio, error | 206Pb/204Pb e | ± | Pichat, Sylvain | ||
| 8 | Lead-207/Lead-204 ratio | 207Pb/204Pb | Pichat, Sylvain | |||
| 9 | Lead-207/Lead-204 ratio, error | 207Pb/204Pb e | ± | Pichat, Sylvain | ||
| 10 | Lead-208/Lead-204 ratio | 208Pb/204Pb | Pichat, Sylvain | |||
| 11 | Lead-208/Lead-204 ratio, error | 208Pb/204Pb e | ± | Pichat, Sylvain | ||
| 12 | Lead | Pb | mg/kg | Pichat, Sylvain | ||
| 13 | Lead, standard deviation | Pb std dev | ± | Pichat, Sylvain | ||
| 14 | Sample amount | N | # | Pichat, Sylvain | Number of measurement replicates for concentration |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
691 data points
Data
| 1 Event | 2 Sample label | 3 Method comm | 4 Age [ka BP] | 5 Depth sed [m] | 6 206Pb/204Pb | 7 206Pb/204Pb e [±] | 8 207Pb/204Pb | 9 207Pb/204Pb e [±] | 10 208Pb/204Pb | 11 208Pb/204Pb e [±] | 12 Pb [mg/kg] | 13 Pb std dev [±] | 14 N [#] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138-849 | ODP004-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 3.1 | 0.040 | 18.9148 | 11 | 15.6573 | 11 | 38.5358 | 30 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP004-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 3.1 | 0.040 | 18.9154 | 12 | 15.6578 | 11 | 38.5368 | 31 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP004 average | 3.1 | 0.040 | 18.9151 | 15.6575 | 38.5363 | 1.92 | 0.63 | 2 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP012-A | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 4.3 | 0.120 | 18.9908 | 13 | 15.6701 | 14 | 38.5358 | 37 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP012-B | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 4.3 | 0.120 | 18.9918 | 9 | 15.6706 | 11 | 38.5371 | 35 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP012 average | 4.3 | 0.120 | 18.9913 | 15.6703 | 38.5364 | 6.58 | 1.40 | 2 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP032 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 8.2 | 0.320 | 18.7582 | 11 | 15.6204 | 12 | 38.5035 | 36 | 1.46 | 0.08 | 2 |
| 138-849 | ODP042-A | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 10.5 | 0.420 | 18.5921 | 26 | 15.5874 | 32 | 38.4602 | 106 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP042-B | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 10.5 | 0.420 | 18.5912 | 13 | 15.5873 | 15 | 38.4597 | 47 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP042 average | 10.5 | 0.420 | 18.5916 | 15.5874 | 38.4599 | 0.94 | 0.15 | 3 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP052-A-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 12.5 | 0.520 | 18.5988 | 13 | 15.5906 | 15 | 38.4771 | 49 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP052-A-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 12.5 | 0.520 | 18.6007 | 8 | 15.5929 | 10 | 38.4848 | 30 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP052-B-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 12.5 | 0.520 | 18.5983 | 34 | 15.5914 | 37 | 38.4840 | 114 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP052-B-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 12.5 | 0.520 | 18.5983 | 23 | 15.5914 | 20 | 38.4839 | 52 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP052 average | 12.5 | 0.520 | 18.5990 | 15.5916 | 38.4825 | 1.07 | 0.16 | 1 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODPO62 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 14.5 | 0.620 | 18.6197 | 8 | 15.6002 | 8 | 38.5305 | 26 | 1.28 | 0.41 | 2 |
| 138-849 | ODP072-A | TIMS (ThermoFisher Triton) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 17.1 | 0.740 | 18.6429 | 13 | 15.6080 | 17 | 38.5590 | 55 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP072-B | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 17.1 | 0.740 | 18.6389 | 32 | 15.6043 | 28 | 38.5482 | 76 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP072 average | 17.1 | 0.740 | 18.6411 | 15.6063 | 38.5543 | 1.12 | 0.19 | 1 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP082-A-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 18.9 | 0.820 | 18.6638 | 14 | 15.6147 | 16 | 38.5926 | 49 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP082-A-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 18.9 | 0.820 | 18.6634 | 14 | 15.6136 | 16 | 38.5915 | 49 | |||
| 138-849 | ODPO82 average | 18.9 | 0.820 | 18.6636 | 15.6142 | 38.5920 | 1.18 | 0.11 | 3 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP102-A | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 23.6 | 1.020 | 18.7138 | 34 | 15.6216 | 27 | 38.5756 | 68 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP102-B | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 23.6 | 1.020 | 18.7126 | 33 | 15.6239 | 28 | 38.5770 | 64 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP102-C | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 23.6 | 1.020 | 18.7114 | 25 | 15.6220 | 25 | 38.5791 | 58 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP102 average | 23.6 | 1.020 | 18.7126 | 15.6225 | 38.5772 | 1.28 | 0.34 | 3 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP122-A | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 28.6 | 1.220 | 18.6418 | 32 | 15.6057 | 26 | 38.5603 | 69 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP122-B | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 28.6 | 1.220 | 18.6443 | 48 | 15.6067 | 52 | 38.5621 | 162 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP122 average | 28.6 | 1.220 | 18.6431 | 15.6062 | 38.5612 | 0.76 | 0.04 | 3 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP131 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 31.4 | 1.310 | 18.6284 | 30 | 15.6010 | 26 | 38.5358 | 60 | 0.86 | 0.08 | 2 |
| 138-849 | ODP142-rep1 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 34.4 | 1.420 | 18.6820 | 23 | 15.6108 | 26 | 38.5502 | 56 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP142-rep2 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 34.4 | 1.420 | 18.6783 | 30 | 15.6148 | 25 | 38.5512 | 59 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP142 average | 34.4 | 1.420 | 18.6802 | 15.6128 | 38.5507 | 1.12 | 0.31 | 3 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP152a | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 37.9 | 1.530 | 18.6293 | 13 | 15.6009 | 13 | 38.5417 | 38 | 0.71 | 0.16 | 1 |
| 138-849 | ODP162-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 41.1 | 1.620 | 18.6353 | 9 | 15.6013 | 10 | 38.5379 | 32 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP162-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 41.1 | 1.620 | 18.6342 | 9 | 15.5999 | 10 | 38.5332 | 31 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP162-rep3 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 41.1 | 1.620 | 18.6338 | 10 | 15.5994 | 12 | 38.5317 | 38 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP162 average | 41.1 | 1.620 | 18.6345 | 15.6002 | 38.5342 | 0.92 | 0.16 | 2 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP170 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 44.1 | 1.700 | 18.6381 | 73 | 15.6022 | 62 | 38.5410 | 150 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 1 |
| 138-849 | ODP182 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 48.6 | 1.820 | 18.6258 | 8 | 15.6000 | 9 | 38.5268 | 28 | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2 |
| 138-849 | ODP192-rep1 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 52.2 | 1.920 | 18.6320 | 22 | 15.6016 | 25 | 38.5384 | 63 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP192-rep2 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 52.2 | 1.920 | 18.6257 | 72 | 15.6042 | 70 | 38.5424 | 155 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP192 average | 52.2 | 1.920 | 18.6288 | 15.6029 | 38.5404 | 1.86 | 0.36 | 1 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP202 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 55.8 | 2.020 | 18.6591 | 7 | 15.6053 | 7 | 38.5384 | 22 | 1.63 | 0.39 | 3 |
| 138-849 | ODP211 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 59.2 | 2.110 | 18.6208 | 9 | 15.5963 | 10 | 38.5118 | 30 | 0.63 | 0.11 | 1 |
| 138-849 | ODP222-A | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 63.2 | 2.220 | 18.6418 | 26 | 15.6026 | 32 | 38.5467 | 106 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP222-B | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 63.2 | 2.220 | 18.6414 | 38 | 15.6033 | 35 | 38.5512 | 79 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP222 average | 63.2 | 2.220 | 18.6416 | 15.6030 | 38.5490 | 1.10 | 0.20 | 2 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP232 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 66.4 | 2.320 | 18.6496 | 13 | 15.6011 | 14 | 38.5520 | 44 | 1.64 | 0.21 | 1 |
| 138-849 | ODP242-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 69.4 | 2.410 | 18.6327 | 45 | 15.5985 | 56 | 38.5283 | 182 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP242-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 69.4 | 2.410 | 18.6322 | 10 | 15.5979 | 10 | 38.5263 | 31 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP242 average | 69.4 | 2.410 | 18.6324 | 15.5982 | 38.5273 | 1.51 | 0.18 | 2 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP252 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 72.6 | 2.520 | 18.6174 | 13 | 15.5932 | 13 | 38.5000 | 39 | 1.39 | 0.39 | 2 |
| 138-849 | ODP272-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 78.8 | 2.720 | 18.6570 | 18 | 15.6060 | 22 | 38.5677 | 70 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP272-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 78.8 | 2.720 | 18.6583 | 9 | 15.6076 | 9 | 38.5731 | 27 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP272 average | 78.8 | 2.720 | 18.6577 | 15.6068 | 38.5704 | 1.37 | 0.16 | 1 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP292 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 85.3 | 2.920 | 18.6615 | 12 | 15.6052 | 12 | 38.5638 | 34 | 1.58 | 0.32 | 2 |
| 138-849 | ODP331-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 101.3 | 3.310 | 18.6423 | 18 | 15.6037 | 17 | 38.5514 | 44 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP331-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 101.3 | 3.310 | 18.6418 | 18 | 15.6026 | 17 | 38.5504 | 46 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP331 average | 101.3 | 3.310 | 18.6420 | 15.6031 | 38.5509 | 1.23 | 0.21 | 1 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP342-rep1 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 106.5 | 3.420 | 18.6365 | 33 | 15.6010 | 29 | 38.5467 | 69 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP342-rep2 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 106.5 | 3.420 | 18.6380 | 40 | 15.6027 | 35 | 38.5530 | 92 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP342 average | 106.5 | 3.420 | 18.6373 | 15.6019 | 38.5499 | 1.32 | 0.31 | 3 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP362-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 114.7 | 3.610 | 18.6382 | 18 | 15.6019 | 20 | 38.5552 | 61 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP362-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 114.7 | 3.610 | 18.6386 | 13 | 15.6023 | 12 | 38.5567 | 32 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP362 average | 114.7 | 3.610 | 18.6384 | 15.6021 | 38.5559 | 1.52 | 0.16 | 1 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP382 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 122.0 | 3.820 | 18.6012 | 8 | 15.5863 | 8 | 38.4753 | 24 | 1.17 | 0.14 | 1 |
| 138-849 | ODP403 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 127.9 | 4.030 | 18.6121 | 7 | 15.5883 | 7 | 38.4846 | 20 | 1.22 | 0.19 | 1 |
| 138-849 | ODP431 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 134.5 | 4.310 | 18.6468 | 8 | 15.6015 | 8 | 38.5539 | 23 | 1.10 | 0.16 | 1 |
| 138-849 | ODP472-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 144.2 | 4.710 | 18.6693 | 16 | 15.6103 | 14 | 38.5991 | 37 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP472-rep2 | TIMS (ThermoFisher Triton) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 144.2 | 4.710 | 18.6699 | 11 | 15.6125 | 14 | 38.5956 | 46 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP472 average | 144.2 | 4.710 | 18.6696 | 15.6114 | 38.5973 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 1 | ||||
| 138-849 | ODP513-rep1 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 155.8 | 5.130 | 18.6484 | 52 | 15.6055 | 47 | 38.5602 | 134 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP513-rep2 | MC-ICP-MS (Nu HR, Nu instruments) using Tl-doping (White et al., 2000) | 155.8 | 5.130 | 18.6495 | 30 | 15.6065 | 25 | 38.5637 | 64 | |||
| 138-849 | ODP513 average | 155.8 | 5.130 | 18.6489 | 15.6060 | 38.5619 | 1.09 | 0.21 | 1 | ||||
| VNTR01-8PC | VNTR-8 9 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 4.2 | 0.095 | 18.6335 | 11 | 15.6013 | 10 | 38.5307 | 29 | 0.99 | 0.18 | 1 |
| VNTR01-8PC | VNTR-8 13-rep1 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 6.0 | 0.135 | 18.6122 | 9 | 15.5937 | 9 | 38.5084 | 26 | |||
| VNTR01-8PC | VNTR-8 13-rep2 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 6.0 | 0.135 | 18.6109 | 12 | 15.5926 | 12 | 38.5057 | 31 | |||
| VNTR01-8PC | VNTR-8 13 average | 6.0 | 0.135 | 18.6116 | 15.5931 | 38.5070 | 1.03 | 0.20 | 1 | ||||
| VNTR01-8PC | VNTR-8 31 | TIMS (Finnigan MAT 261) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 14.0 | 0.315 | 18.5923 | 10 | 15.5849 | 66 | 38.4591 | 28 | 1.17 | 0.15 | 1 |
| Cumbre_Ventimilla | Chimbarazo-rep1 | TIMS (ThermoFisher Triton) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 19.0172 | 14 | 15.6674 | 18 | 38.8678 | 59 | |||||
| Cumbre_Ventimilla | Chimbarazo-rep2 | TIMS (ThermoFisher Triton) using the triple spike technique (Galer, 1999) | 19.0174 | 14 | 15.6673 | 18 | 38.8669 | 58 | |||||
| Cumbre_Ventimilla | Chimbarazo average | 19.0173 | 15.6674 | 38.8673 | 7.32 | 0.39 | 1 |