Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Street, Lorna E; Shaver, Gauis R; Rastetter, Edward B; van Wijk, Mark T; Kaye, Brooke A; Williams, Mathew (2012): (Table 3) Leaf area and leaf nitrogen for deciduous, evergreen, forb and graminoid species at Barrow, Svalbard and Zackenberg [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.837943, Supplement to: Street, LE et al. (2012): Incident radiation and the allocation of nitrogen within Arctic plant canopies: implications for predicting gross primary productivity. Global Change Biology, 18(9), 2838-2852, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02754.x

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
Arctic vegetation is characterized by high spatial variability in plant functional type (PFT) composition and gross primary productivity (P). Despite this variability, the two main drivers of P in sub-Arctic tundra are leaf area index (LT) and total foliar nitrogen (NT). LT and NT have been shown to be tightly coupled across PFTs in sub-Arctic tundra vegetation, which simplifies up-scaling by allowing quantification of the main drivers of P from remotely sensed LT. Our objective was to test the LT-NT relationship across multiple Arctic latitudes and to assess LT as a predictor of P for the pan-Arctic. Including PFT-specific parameters in models of LT-NT coupling provided only incremental improvements in model fit, but significant improvements were gained from including site-specific parameters. The degree of curvature in the LT-NT relationship, controlled by a fitted canopy nitrogen extinction co-efficient, was negatively related to average levels of diffuse radiation at a site. This is consistent with theoretical predictions of more uniform vertical canopy N distributions under diffuse light conditions. Higher latitude sites had higher average leaf N content by mass (NM), and we show for the first time that LT-NT coupling is achieved across latitudes via canopy-scale trade-offs between NM and leaf mass per unit leaf area (LM). Site-specific parameters provided small but significant improvements in models of P based on LT and moss cover. Our results suggest that differences in LT-NT coupling between sites could be used to improve pan-Arctic models of P and we provide unique evidence that prevailing radiation conditions can significantly affect N allocation over regional scales.
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 74.891020 * Median Longitude: -53.069833 * South-bound Latitude: 71.300000 * West-bound Longitude: -156.667000 * North-bound Latitude: 78.900000 * East-bound Longitude: 18.010000
Minimum Elevation: 7.0 m * Maximum Elevation: 7.0 m
Event(s):
Barrow_plain * Latitude: 71.300000 * Longitude: -156.667000 * Elevation: 7.0 m * Location: Barrow, Alaska, USA * Method/Device: Biological sample (BIOS)
Svalbard * Latitude: 78.900000 * Longitude: 18.010000 * Location: Svalbard * Method/Device: Multiple investigations (MULT)
Zackenberg (ZAC) * Latitude: 74.473060 * Longitude: -20.552500 * Recovery: 3.3 m * Location: Zackenberg, Northeast Greenland * Method/Device: Multiple investigations (MULT)
Comment:
Data extracted in the frame of a joint ICSTI/PANGAEA IPY effort, see http://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.150150
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1Area/localityAreaStreet, Lorna E
2Latitude of eventLatitude
3Longitude of eventLongitude
4SpeciesSpeciesStreet, Lorna E
5Sample amountN#Street, Lorna E
6Vegetation typeVegetation typeStreet, Lorna ED = deciduous, E = evergreen, F = forb, G = graminoid
7Nitrogen per areaN areag/m2Street, Lorna Eper leaf area
8Nitrogen, standard deviationN std dev±Street, Lorna EN/area
9Nitrogen, organicN orgmg/kgStreet, Lorna Eper leaf mass
10Nitrogen, standard deviationN std dev±Street, Lorna EN/mass
11Leaf area, specific, per mass dry weightLA spec DWmm2/mgStreet, Lorna E
12Standard deviationStd dev±Street, Lorna Eleaf area
Size:
300 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML