Citation:

j.quascirev.2014.06.015

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

Kaiser, Jérôme; Lamy, Frank; Hebbeln, Dierk (2005): A 70-kyr sea surface temperature record off southern Chile (Ocean Drilling Programm Site 1233). Paleoceanography, 20(4), PA4009, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005PA001146

Lamy, Frank; Kaiser, Jérôme; Ninnemann, Ulysses S; Hebbeln, Dierk; Arz, Helge Wolfgang; Stoner, Joseph S (2004): Antarctic timing of surface water changes off Chile and Patagonian ice-sheet response. Science, 304(5679), 1959-1962, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097863

Project(s):

Ocean Drilling Program (ODP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -41.000080 * Longitude: -74.449860

Date/Time Start: 2002-04-12T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2002-04-12T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.00 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 133.75 m

Event(s):

202-1233 * Latitude: -41.000080 * Longitude: -74.449860 * Date/Time: 2002-04-12T00:00:00 * Elevation: -838.0 m * Penetration: 451.6 m * Recovery: 422.2 m * Location: South-East Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Joides Resolution * Method/Device: Composite Core (COMPCORE) * Comment: cores; 411 m cored; 40.6 m drilled; 102.7 % recovery

Comment:

Depth is given in meters composite depth.

This updated age model for ODP Site 1233 is based on the age model of Kaiser et al. 2005 (doi:10.1029/2005PA001146), derived from correlation with core GeoB 3313-1, mixed planktonic 14C ages from Lamy et al. 2004 (DOI: 10.1126/science.1097863) and correlation with Byrd. The update applies the MARINE13 calibration and regional reservoir corrections based on Siani et al. 2013 (DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3758).

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Principal Investigator	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m			Geocode
2	Age, dated	Age dated	ka	Mix, Alan C	Age, 14C AMS	uncorrected age, see Kaiser et al. 2005 and Lamy et al. 2004
3	Age, dated standard deviation	Age dated std dev	±	Mix, Alan C		uncorrected, see Kaiser et al. 2005 and Lamy et al. 2004
4	Age, dated	Age dated	ka	Mix, Alan C		as reported by Kaiser et al. 2005. from 0 - 8.86m ages are by correlation with GeoB 3313-1. From 10.55 - 64.81m, ages are radiocarbon ages corrected using CALPAL January 2004 and a constant reservoir age of 400 years. From 67.8m and greater, ages are by SST correlation with Byrd.
5	Age, dated material	Dated material		Mix, Alan C
6	Age, comment	Comm		Mix, Alan C
7	Δ R	Δ R		Mix, Alan C		CALIB delta R parameter for describing deviations from the average global reservoir correction. For planktic ages the surface reservoir corrections were based on the work of Siani et al. 2013 for the Chile margin.
8	Age, dated	Age dated	ka	Mix, Alan C		from 0 - 8.86m ages are by correlation with GeoB 3313-1, corrected using a Delta R planktonic of 400 years. From 10.55 - 64.81m, ages are radiocarbon ages corrected using INTCAL 7.0, MARINE13, and Delta R planktic as noted. From 67.8m and greater, ages are by SST correlation with Byrd
9	Age, dated standard deviation	Age dated std dev	±	Mix, Alan C		see Kaiser et al. 2005 and Lamy et al. 2004. Error is assumed for samples dated by correlation with GeoB 3313-1. 1 sigma error for other samples
10	Age model	Age model	ka	Mix, Alan C	Age, calculated calendar years	inferred age model, based on calibrated radiocarbon ages such that large swings of sedimentation rate are minimized between adjacent date pairs, within the analytical uncertainty of the dating
11	Age, standard deviation	Age std dev	±	Mix, Alan C

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

311 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Age dated [ka] (uncorrected age, see Kaiser e...)	3 Age dated std dev [±] (uncorrected, see Kaiser et al...)	4 Age dated [ka] (as reported by Kaiser et al. ...)	5 Dated material	6 Comm	7 Δ R (CALIB delta R parameter for d...)	8 Age dated [ka] (from 0 - 8.86m ages are by co...)	9 Age dated std dev [±] (see Kaiser et al. 2005 and La...)	10 Age model [ka] (inferred age model, based on ...)	11 Age std dev [±]
0.00			-0.05		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	0	-0.050	0.050	-0.050	0.05
0.41			0.16		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	-0.050	0.050	0.060	0.05
1.45			0.88		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	0.340	0.050	0.370	0.05
2.49			1.62		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	1.080	0.050	1.040	0.05
3.19			2.05		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	1.510	0.050	1.550	0.05
3.75			2.66		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	2.120	0.050	2.120	0.05
3.99			3.05		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	2.510	0.050	2.500	0.05
4.35			3.58		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	3.040	0.050	3.040	0.05
5.28			4.47		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	3.930	0.050	3.950	0.05
6.10			5.20		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	4.660	0.050	4.650	0.05
7.70			6.09		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	5.550	0.050	5.550	0.05
8.42			6.62		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	6.080	0.050	6.060	0.05
8.86			6.93		correlation with core GeoB 3313-1	400	6.390	0.050	6.400	0.15
10.55	8.30	0.06	8.78	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	400	8.360	0.130	8.300	0.15
12.94	9.34	0.08	10.04	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	400	9.620	0.150	9.600	0.15
17.01	10.80	0.07	12.26	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	600	11.190	0.070	11.300	0.10
20.22	12.28	0.07	13.62	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	600	13.180	0.080	13.100	0.10
25.10	14.42	0.11	17.24	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	600	16.140	0.160	16.200	0.20
29.81	17.07	0.11	19.68	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	600	19.380	0.150	19.380	0.20
33.51	18.52	0.13	21.48	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	600	21.170	0.190	21.170	0.20
36.56	19.74	0.14	22.51	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	600	22.600	0.160	22.600	0.20
39.50	21.08	0.15	23.86	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	800	23.910	0.300	24.000	0.30
43.72	22.93	0.23	26.05	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	800	25.990	0.290	26.000	0.30
47.25	25.28	0.24	28.83	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	800	28.130	0.290	28.000	0.30
49.11	26.10	0.29	29.51	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	800	28.970	0.380	29.000	0.40
50.72	26.52	0.30	29.78	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	800	29.360	0.450	29.700	0.50
55.02	29.03	0.39	32.34	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	800	31.690	0.490	31.690	0.50
59.03	32.19	0.58	36.36	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	800	34.930	0.580	34.800	0.60
62.50	34.48	0.75	39.05	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	800	37.480	0.940	37.480	1.00
64.81	35.77	0.79	40.02	mixed planktonic foraminifera	from Lamy et al. 2004 as reported in Kaiser et al. 2005	800	39.170	0.960	39.170	1.00
67.80			41.00		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		41.000		41.000	2.00
74.62			43.01		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		43.010		43.010	2.00
81.25			47.31		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		47.310		47.310	2.00
88.26			51.65		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		51.650		51.650	3.00
96.66			54.76		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		54.760		54.760	3.00
101.55			56.95		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		56.950		56.950	3.00
111.36			59.31		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		59.310		59.310	3.00
121.17			63.70		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		63.700		63.700	4.00
129.56			67.84		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		67.840		67.840	4.00
133.75			69.21		SST correlation with Byrd; from Kaiser et al. 2005		69.210		69.210	4.00