Pavlova, Alexandra; Selwood, Peter; Harrisson, Katherine A; Murray, Neil; Quin, Bruce; Menkhorst, Peter; Smales, Ian; Sunnucks, Paul (2014): Contemporary genetic, historical genetic and morphological data sets for the Yellow-tufted Honeyeater Lichenostomus melanops [dataset publication series]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.830410, Supplement to: Pavlova, A et al. (2014): Integrating phylogeography and morphometrics to assess conservation merits and inform conservation strategies for an endangered subspecies of a common species. Biological Conservation, 174, 136-146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.04.005
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Abstract:
Understanding the evolutionary history of threatened populations can improve their conservation management. Re-establishment of past but recent gene flow could re-invigorate threatened populations and replenish genetic diversity, necessary for population persistence. One of the four nominal subspecies of the common yellow-tufted honeyeater, Lichenostomus melanops cassidix, is critically endangered despite substantial conservation efforts over 55 years. Using a combination of morphometric, genetic and modelling approaches we tested for its evolutionary distinctiveness and conservation merit. We confirmed that cassidix has at least one morphometric distinction. It also differs genetically from the other subspecies in allele frequencies but not phylogenetically, implying that its evolution was recent. Modelling historical distribution supported the lack of vicariance and suggested a possibility of gene flow among subspecies at least since the late Pleistocene. Multi-locus coalescent analyses indicated that cassidix diverged from its common ancestor with neighbouring subspecies gippslandicus sometime from the mid-Pleistocene to the Holocene, and that it has the smallest historical effective population size of all subspecies. It appears that cassidix diverged from its ancestor with gippslandicus through a combination of drift and local selection. From patterns of genetic subdivision on two spatial scales and morphological variation we concluded that cassidix, gippslandicus and (melanops + meltoni) are diagnosable as subspecies. Low genetic diversity and effective population size of cassidix may translate to low genetic fitness and evolutionary potential, thus managed gene flow from gippslandicus is recommended for its recovery.
Further details:
Coverage:
Median Latitude: -37.200813 * Median Longitude: 146.057326 * South-bound Latitude: -38.483000 * West-bound Longitude: 145.466000 * North-bound Latitude: -36.230000 * East-bound Longitude: 148.092000
Comment:
Manuscript ID BIOC-D-14-00038, accepted pending minor revision 2014-02-20
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
4 datasets
Download Data
Datasets listed in this publication series
- Pavlova, A; Selwood, P; Harrisson, KA et al. (2014): Contemporary genetic data set as flat file (zipped). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.830408
- Pavlova, A; Selwood, P; Harrisson, KA et al. (2014): Historical genetic data set as flat file (zipped). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.830409
- Pavlova, A; Selwood, P; Harrisson, KA et al. (2014): Phased haplotype files for 15 nuclear genes in NEXUS format (zipped). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.830407
- Pavlova, A; Selwood, P; Harrisson, KA et al. (2014): Geographic and morphometric data for 204 individuals of Lichenostomus melanops cassidix and Lichenostomus melanops gippslandicus in East Victoria, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.830405