Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Lopez, Cynthia M (1982): (Table 1) Core descriptions at DSDP Leg 66 Holes [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.817707, Supplement to: Lopez, CM (1982): Petrography and diagenesis of sands and sandstones, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 66. In: Watkins, JS; Casey Moore, J; et al. (eds.), Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 66, 505-520, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.66.116.1982

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

Published: 1982 (exact date unknown)DOI registered: 2013-09-04

RIS CitationBibTeX Citation ShareShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
Sands and sandstones from Leg 66 of the Deep Sea Drilling Project can be grouped into three general categories based upon textural and diagenetic similarities. Early Miocene upper slope sandstones from Sites 489 and 493 are cemented either by calcite, or by gypsum. Calcite is volumetrically the most important cement; it occurs as a void-filling cement in foraminifer chambers, as a micritic to sparry pore-filling cement, and as a replacement mineral in framework grains. The gypsum cement has a patchy distribution and appears to have been introduced along fractures in upper slope sands.
Quaternary lower slope sands from Sites 488 and 486 are either weakly consolidated or totally unconsolidated. Framework grains in finer-grained sands are surrounded by thin, discontinuous films of chlorite and illite, which originated largely from the in situ alteration of biotite. Coarser-grained sands have thicker, more continuous clay films that consist of altered detrital biotite and of mechanically dispersed illite and chlorite. Subsequent burial diagenesis could totally obscure these differences in the origin of matrix between the finer- and coarser-grained sands.
Middle to late Miocene slope sands from Site 492 have a complicated diagenetic history. There is a pervasive network of fractures throughout the sands, yet there has been no rotation of grain fragments. Either the sands were fractured tectonically following compaction or they were fractured as a result of compaction subsequent to decementation. Interbedded shales from this site are also intensively fractured, which suggests that the possibility of tectonic fracturing is more likely.
Project(s):
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 16.087222 * Median Longitude: -99.018256 * South-bound Latitude: 15.913800 * West-bound Longitude: -99.138000 * North-bound Latitude: 16.381000 * East-bound Longitude: -98.925500
Date/Time Start: 1979-03-22T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1979-04-24T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 9.50 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 621.30 m
Event(s):
66-486 * Latitude: 15.922800 * Longitude: -99.135000 * Date/Time: 1979-03-22T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5142.0 m * Penetration: 38 m * Recovery: 17.5 m * Location: North Pacific/TRENCH * Campaign: Leg66 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 43 m cored; 0 m drilled; 40.7 % recovery
66-486A * Latitude: 15.913800 * Longitude: -99.138000 * Date/Time: 1979-03-22T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5138.0 m * Penetration: 22 m * Recovery: 3.5 m * Location: North Pacific/TRENCH * Campaign: Leg66 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 3 cores; 22 m cored; 0 m drilled; 16 % recovery
66-488 * Latitude: 15.951700 * Longitude: -99.027700 * Date/Time: 1979-03-27T00:00:00 * Elevation: -4254.0 m * Penetration: 428.5 m * Recovery: 159.5 m * Location: North Pacific/CREST * Campaign: Leg66 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 44 cores; 408 m cored; 19 m drilled; 39.1 % recovery
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1Event labelEvent
2Latitude of eventLatitude
3Longitude of eventLongitude
4Elevation of eventElevationm
5Sample code/labelSample labelLopez, Cynthia MDSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
6DEPTH, sediment/rockDepth sedmGeocode – mbsf
7CommentCommentLopez, Cynthia M
8EpochEpochLopez, Cynthia M
9DescriptionDescriptionLopez, Cynthia M
10Description 2 (continued)Description 2Lopez, Cynthia M
Size:
157 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML