Mottl, Michael J; Anderson, Roger N; Jenkins, William J; Lawrence, James R (1983): (Table 1) Water samples collected from basaltic basement at DSDP Holes 68-501 and 69-504B [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.816382, Supplement to: Mottl, MJ et al. (1983): Chemistry of waters sampled from basaltic basement in Deep Sea Drilling Project Holes 501, 504B, and 505B. In: Cann, JR; Langseth, MG; Honnorez, J; Von Herzen, RP; White, SM; et al. (eds.), Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 69, 475-483, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.69.122.1983
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Published: 1983 (exact date unknown) • DOI registered: 2013-08-15
Abstract:
The first attempts to sample formation waters from basaltic basement in the oceanic crust were made at Sites 501, 504, and 505 of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Two methods were used. In the first, the water that occupied the hole was sampled some time after pumping had stopped. In the second, water from both the hole and the surrounding rocks was sampled by sealing off a 3-meter section at the bottom of the hole and opening a large-volume sampler, thereby creating negative pressure. Neither method produced a sample that contained an appreciable and unambiguous component of true formation water, although the samples generally showed large compositional differences from seawater. Samples from Holes 501 and 505B were mainly mixtures of the surface seawater used as drilling fluid and pore water from sediment that fell down the hole. Samples from Hole 504B contained a large fraction of seawater that displayed large chemical changes due to reaction with basement basalts. Tritium analyses revealed the samples to be surface seawater that had been pumped into the formation a few days earlier and had reacted rapidly with basalt at the in situ temperature of 80°C. The solutions had gained Ca and lost Mg on a mole-for-mole basis, lost K and possibly SO4, and gained Si. The Si/Ca ratio increased with depth. These results are consistent with those of laboratory experiments in which seawater reacted with basalt at 70 °C and indicate that at 80 °C in situ reaction rates in the crust are sufficiently rapid to produce large changes in solution chemistry almost instantaneously. The absence of an 18O shift in the solutions indicates that the amount of rock that reacted with the solution during its brief residence in the crust was negligible.
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 1.458133 * Median Longitude: -83.750933 * South-bound Latitude: 1.227200 * West-bound Longitude: -83.788300 * North-bound Latitude: 1.920000 * East-bound Longitude: -83.730200
Date/Time Start: 1979-07-08T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1979-10-07T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 159.0 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 835.0 m
Event(s):
68-501 * Latitude: 1.227200 * Longitude: -83.734300 * Date/Time: 1979-07-08T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3457.0 m * Penetration: 337.1 m * Recovery: 70.5 m * Location: North Pacific/FLANK * Campaign: Leg68 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 19 cores; 137.7 m cored; 0.5 m drilled; 51.2 % recovery
69-504B * Latitude: 1.227200 * Longitude: -83.730200 * Date/Time: 1979-10-07T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3460.0 m * Penetration: 489 m * Recovery: 262 m * Campaign: Leg69 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL)
69-505B * Latitude: 1.920000 * Longitude: -83.788300 * Date/Time: 1979-09-29T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3507.0 m * Penetration: 178 m * Recovery: 6.8 m * Location: North Pacific/GRABEN * Campaign: Leg69 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 6 cores; 42 m cored; 0 m drilled; 16.3 % recovery
Comment:
Sediment depth is given in mbsf. In sediment depth #835 = about 835 and #159 = 159(144)
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Event label | Event | ||||
| 2 | Latitude of event | Latitude | ||||
| 3 | Longitude of event | Longitude | ||||
| 4 | Elevation of event | Elevation | m | |||
| 5 | Sample method | Sample method | Mottl, Michael J | |||
| 6 | Number | No | Mottl, Michael J | Of aliquots | ||
| 7 | Volume | Vol | l | Mottl, Michael J | Total | |
| 8 | Depth, relative | Depth rel | m | Mottl, Michael J | Sub-basement depth; #23 = 23(8); #560 = about 560 | |
| 9 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 10 | Temperature, in rock/sediment | t | °C | Mottl, Michael J | Measured | # = about; Measured temperature is the in situ temperature of the sample when collected. Conductive temperature is the in situ temperature prior to disturbance by drilling, as estimated from temperature and conductivity measurements in the sediment section for Hole 501 and from the temperature logs in basement for Hole 504B |
| 11 | Temperature, in rock/sediment | t | °C | Mottl, Michael J | Measured | Conductive; Measured temperature is the in situ temperature of the sample when collected. Conductive temperature is the in situ temperature prior to disturbance by drilling, as estimated from temperature and conductivity measurements in the sediment section for Hole 501 and from the temperature logs in basement for Hole 504B |
| 12 | Contamination | Contamination | Mottl, Michael J | Degree of contamination from surface seawater | ||
| 13 | Contamination | Contamination | Mottl, Michael J | Degree of contamination from bottom seawater | ||
| 14 | Contamination | Contamination | Mottl, Michael J | Degree of contamination from sediment pore water | ||
| 15 | Contamination | Contamination | Mottl, Michael J | Degree of contamination from drilling mud slurry |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
96 data points
Data
| 1 Event | 2 Latitude | 3 Longitude | 4 Elevation [m] | 5 Sample method | 6 No (Of aliquots) | 7 Vol [l] (Total) | 8 Depth rel [m] (Sub-basement depth; #23 = 23(...) | 9 Depth sed [m] | 10 t [°C] (# = about; Measured temperatu...) | 11 t [°C] (Conductive; Measured temperat...) | 12 Contamination (Degree of contamination from ...) | 13 Contamination (Degree of contamination from ...) | 14 Contamination (Degree of contamination from ...) | 15 Contamination (Degree of contamination from ...) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68-501 | 1.2272 | -83.7343 | -3457 | Lynes Packer | 2 | 51.00 | 19.0 | 283.0 | 61.0 | Heavy | - | Very light? | - | |
| 68-501 | 1.2272 | -83.7343 | -3457 | Gearhart-Owen wireline tool | 1 | 0.10 | 48.0 | 312.0 | 41.5 | 63.0 | Heavy | - | Heavy | Moderate |
| 69-504B | 1.2272 | -83.7302 | -3460 | Gearhart-Owen wireline tool | 1 | 2.20 | 194.0 | 468.5 | 69.0 | 80.0 | Heavy | - | - | Light |
| 69-504B | 1.2272 | -83.7302 | -3460 | Lynes Packer | 7 | 51.00 | 211.5 | 486.0 | 81.5 | Heavy | - | - | Very light | |
| 69-504B | 1.2272 | -83.7302 | -3460 | Barnes, in situ water sampler - 173 | 1 | 0.06 | 80.0 | 355.0 | 8.5 | 68.5 | Light | Very heavy | - | - |
| 69-504B | 1.2272 | -83.7302 | -3460 | Barnes, in situ water sampler - 174 | 1 | 0.06 | 185.0 | 460.0 | 76.0 | 78.5 | - | Heavy | - | - |
| 69-504B | 1.2272 | -83.7302 | -3460 | Barnes, in situ water sampler - 175 | 1 | 0.06 | 365.0 | 640.0 | 76.0 | 98.0 | Heavy | - | - | Very light |
| 69-504B | 1.2272 | -83.7302 | -3460 | Barnes, in situ water sampler - 194 | 1 | 0.06 | 440.0 | 715.0 | 106.5 | Heavy | - | - | Light | |
| 69-504B | 1.2272 | -83.7302 | -3460 | Gearhart-Owen wireline tool | 1 | 1.00 | #560.0 | 835.0 | 111.0 | 120.0 | Heavy | - | - | Very heavy |
| 69-505B | 1.9200 | -83.7883 | -3507 | Gearhart-Owen wireline tool | 1 | 0.11 | #23.0 | 159.0 | #3.0 | Heavy | - | Heavy | - |
