Dünweber, Michael; Swalethorp, Rasmus; Kjellerup, Sanne; Nielsen, Torkel Gissel; Arendt, Kristine Engel; Hjorth, Morten; Tönnesson, Kajsa; Møller, Eva Friis (2010): (Table 2) Phytoplankton and copepod biomass and specific ingestion rates and grazing impact of Calanus spp. in Disko Bay [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.809458, In supplement to: Dünweber, M et al. (2010): Succession and fate of the spring diatom bloom in Disko Bay, western Greenland. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 419, 11-29, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08813
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Coverage:
Latitude: 69.233300 * Longitude: -53.433300
Date/Time Start: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2008-05-28T00:00:00
Event(s):
Comment:
Integrated phytoplankton and copepod biomass in the upper 50 m and specific ingestion rates and corresponding grazing impact (% of phytoplankton biomass/day) estimated by 4 methods: (A) in situ faecal pellet production experiment, (B) average gut fluorescence in 3 Calanus spp., (C) average faecal pellet production from bottle incubations of 3 Calanus spp., and (D) egg production by C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis.
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Environment | Environment | Dünweber, Michael | bloom phase | ||
| 2 | DATE/TIME | Date/Time | Geocode | |||
| 3 | Date/time end | Date/time end | Dünweber, Michael | |||
| 4 | Phytoplankton, biomass as carbon, integrated | Phytopl C int | mg/m2 | Dünweber, Michael | ||
| 5 | Phytoplankton, biomass, standard deviation | Phytopl biom std dev | ± | Dünweber, Michael | ||
| 6 | Sample amount, subset | N subset | # | Dünweber, Michael | phytoplankton biomass | |
| 7 | Copepoda, biomass as carbon, integrated | Copepoda C | mg/m2 | Dünweber, Michael | ||
| 8 | Copepoda, biomass, standard deviation | Copepoda C std dev | ± | Dünweber, Michael | ||
| 9 | Sample amount, subset | N subset | # | Dünweber, Michael | copepod biomass | |
| 10 | Ingestion rate of phytoplankton biomass per day | IR phytopl biom | %/day | Dünweber, Michael | method (A) | |
| 11 | Ingestion rate, standard deviation | IR std dev | ± | Dünweber, Michael | method (A) | |
| 12 | Sample amount, subset | N subset | # | Dünweber, Michael | method (A) | |
| 13 | Grazing impact | Grazing imp | % | Dünweber, Michael | method (A); in % of phytoplankton biomass | |
| 14 | Ingestion rate of phytoplankton biomass per day | IR phytopl biom | %/day | Dünweber, Michael | method (B) | |
| 15 | Ingestion rate, standard deviation | IR std dev | ± | Dünweber, Michael | method (B) | |
| 16 | Sample amount, subset | N subset | # | Dünweber, Michael | method (B) | |
| 17 | Grazing impact | Grazing imp | % | Dünweber, Michael | method (B), in % of phytoplankton biomass | |
| 18 | Ingestion rate of phytoplankton biomass per day | IR phytopl biom | %/day | Dünweber, Michael | method (C) | |
| 19 | Ingestion rate, standard deviation | IR std dev | ± | Dünweber, Michael | method (C) | |
| 20 | Sample amount, subset | N subset | # | Dünweber, Michael | method (C) | |
| 21 | Grazing impact | Grazing imp | % | Dünweber, Michael | method (C), in % of phytoplankton biomass | |
| 22 | Ingestion rate of phytoplankton biomass per day | IR phytopl biom | %/day | Dünweber, Michael | method (D) | |
| 23 | Ingestion rate, standard deviation | IR std dev | ± | Dünweber, Michael | method (D) | |
| 24 | Sample amount, subset | N subset | # | Dünweber, Michael | method (D) | |
| 25 | Grazing impact | Grazing imp | % | Dünweber, Michael | method (D), in % of phytoplankton biomass | |
| 26 | Ingestion rate of phytoplankton biomass per day | IR phytopl biom | %/day | Dünweber, Michael | average over all methods | |
| 27 | Grazing impact | Grazing imp | % | Dünweber, Michael | average over all methods |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
78 data points
Data
| 1 Environment (bloom phase) | 2 Date/Time | 3 Date/time end | 4 Phytopl C int [mg/m2] | 5 Phytopl biom std dev [±] | 6 N subset [#] (phytoplankton biomass) | 7 Copepoda C [mg/m2] | 8 Copepoda C std dev [±] | 9 N subset [#] (copepod biomass) | 10 IR phytopl biom [%/day] (method (A)) | 11 IR std dev [±] (method (A)) | 12 N subset [#] (method (A)) | 13 Grazing imp [%] (method (A); in % of phytoplan...) | 14 IR phytopl biom [%/day] (method (B)) | 15 IR std dev [±] (method (B)) | 16 N subset [#] (method (B)) | 17 Grazing imp [%] (method (B), in % of phytoplan...) | 18 IR phytopl biom [%/day] (method (C)) | 19 IR std dev [±] (method (C)) | 20 N subset [#] (method (C)) | 21 Grazing imp [%] (method (C), in % of phytoplan...) | 22 IR phytopl biom [%/day] (method (D)) | 23 IR std dev [±] (method (D)) | 24 N subset [#] (method (D)) | 25 Grazing imp [%] (method (D), in % of phytoplan...) | 26 IR phytopl biom [%/day] (average over all methods) | 27 Grazing imp [%] (average over all methods) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developing bloom | 2008-04-23 | 2008-04-30 | 18300 | 2700 | 5 | 2700 | 1100 | 5 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 29 | 0.4 | 14.1 | 4.4 | 15 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 164 | 0.3 | 5.6 | 0.4 | 93 | 0.8 | 6.4 | 1.0 |
| Decaying bloom | 2008-05-02 | 2008-05-19 | 9400 | 3300 | 5 | 4000 | 1900 | 5 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 37 | 2.5 | 12.5 | 2.8 | 15 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 197 | 0.9 | 7.4 | 0.5 | 133 | 3.2 | 7.2 | 3.4 |
| Post bloom | 2008-05-28 | 2008-06-09 | 3800 | 2700 | 3 | 2900 | 300 | 5 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 23 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 164 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 47 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 |