Hugelius, Gustaf; Kuhry, Peter; Tarnocai, Charles; Virtanen, Tarmo A (2010): (Table 3) Soil organic carbon storage of peatland and tundra types along Tulemalu Lake [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.786464, In supplement to: Hugelius, G et al. (2010): Soil organic carbon pools in a periglacial landscape: a case study from the central Canadian Arctic. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 21(1), 16-29, https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.677
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Coverage:
Latitude: 62.901600 * Longitude: -99.161500
Date/Time Start: 2006-08-07T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2006-08-15T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.15 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.65 m
Event(s):
Parameter(s):
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
155 data points
Data
1 Vegetation type ((no. of sites)) | 2 Depth sed [m] | 3 Depth top [m] | 4 Depth bot [m] | 5 C org area [kg/m2] (mean, total) | 6 Std dev [±] (total) | 7 C org area [kg/m2] (top organic layer) | 8 Std dev [±] (top organic layer) | 9 C org area [kg/m2] (cryoturbated pockets) | 10 Std dev [±] (cryoturbated pockets) | 11 C org area [kg/m2] (mineral subsoil) | 12 Std dev [±] (mineral subsoil) | 13 C org area [kg/m2] (permafrost) | 14 Std dev [±] (permafrost) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bog peatlanda (n: 3) | 0.50 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 81.7 | 24.7 | ||||||||
Bog peatlanda (n: 3) | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 35.2 | 2.4 | ||||||||
Bog peatlanda (n: 3) | 0.65 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 46.6 | 22.4 | ||||||||
Bog peatlanda (n: 3) | 79.9 | 27.7 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 42.9 | 21.4 | |||||||
Fen peatlandb (n: 7) | 0.50 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 27.7 | 9.7 | ||||||||
Fen peatlandb (n: 7) | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 16.8 | 2.0 | ||||||||
Fen peatlandb (n: 7) | 0.65 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 10.9 | 8.6 | ||||||||
Fen peatlandb (n: 7) | 21.5 | 9.8 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 6.4 | 8.4 | |||||||
Wet shrub tundra (n: 5) | 0.50 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 40.3 | 9.8 | ||||||||
Wet shrub tundra (n: 5) | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 20.6 | 4.1 | ||||||||
Wet shrub tundra (n: 5) | 0.65 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 19.8 | 10.9 | ||||||||
Wet shrub tundra (n: 5) | 22.0 | 6.8 | 11.1 | 13.1 | 7.2 | 8.4 | 15.2 | 15.4 | |||||
Moist shrub tundra (n: 12) | 0.50 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 21.2 | 9.4 | ||||||||
Moist shrub tundra (n: 12) | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 9.8 | 5.2 | ||||||||
Moist shrub tundra (n: 12) | 0.65 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 11.4 | 6.0 | ||||||||
Moist shrub tundra (n: 12) | 3.7 | 2.2 | 10.2 | 10.9 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 3.3 | 5.0 | |||||
Dry shrub tundra (n: 5) | 0.50 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 13.9 | 8.4 | ||||||||
Dry shrub tundra (n: 5) | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 6.0 | 3.0 | ||||||||
Dry shrub tundra (n: 5) | 0.65 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 7.9 | 6.1 | ||||||||
Dry shrub tundra (n: 5) | 3.6 | 2.5 | 6.1 | 9.6 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 | |||||
Lichen tundra (n: 3) | 0.50 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 11.9 | 5.7 | ||||||||
Lichen tundra (n: 3) | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 4.8 | 3.5 | ||||||||
Lichen tundra (n: 3) | 0.65 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | ||||||||
Lichen tundra (n: 3) | 1.9 | 1.8 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 1.2 | |||||||
Study area, average | 22.2 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 11.8 | |||||||||
Study area, average | 0.50 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 33.8 | |||||||||
Study area, average | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 16.3 | |||||||||
Study area, average | 0.65 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 17.5 |