Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Riley, Karin L; Bendick, Rebecca; Hyde, Kevin D (2012): Debris flow magnitudes: a global catalog [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.783654

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

Published: 2012-06-06DOI registered: 2012-07-10

RIS CitationBibTeX Citation Copy Citation Share 543 124 93

Abstract:
The episodic occurrence of debris flow events in response to stochastic precipitation and wildfire events makes hazard prediction challenging. Previous work has shown that frequency-magnitude distributions of non-fire-related debris flows follow a power law, but less is known about the distribution of post-fire debris flows. As a first step in parameterizing hazard models, we use frequency-magnitude distributions and cumulative distribution functions to compare volumes of post-fire debris flows to non-fire-related debris flows. Due to the large number of events required to parameterize frequency-magnitude distributions, and the relatively small number of post-fire event magnitudes recorded in the literature, we collected data on 73 recent post-fire events in the field. The resulting catalog of 988 debris flow events is presented as an appendix to this article. We found that the empirical cumulative distribution function of post-fire debris flow volumes is composed of smaller events than that of non-fire-related debris flows. In addition, the slope of the frequency-magnitude distribution of post-fire debris flows is steeper than that of non-fire-related debris flows, evidence that differences in the post-fire environment tend to produce a higher proportion of small events. We propose two possible explanations: 1) post-fire events occur on shorter return intervals than debris flows in similar basins that do not experience fire, causing their distribution to shift toward smaller events due to limitations in sediment supply, or 2) fire causes changes in resisting and driving forces on a package of sediment, such that a smaller perturbation of the system is required in order for a debris flow to occur, resulting in smaller event volumes.
Related to:
Booker, Frederick Andrew (1998): Landscape and management response to wildfires in California. University of California, 436 pp
Cannon, Susan H (1989): An evaluation of the travel-distance potential of debris flows. Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Miscellaneous, 89-2
Cannon, Susan H; Powers, P S; Savage, W Z (1998): Fire-related hyperconcentrated and debris flows on Storm King Mountain, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, USA. Environmental Geology, 35(2-3), 210-218, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050307
Cenderelli, Daniel A; Kite, J Steven (1998): Geomorphic effects of large debris flows on channel morphology at North Fork Mountain, eastern West Virginia, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23(1), 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199801)23:1%3C1::AID-ESP814%3E3.0.CO;2-3
Clague, John J; Friele, Prierre A; Hutchinson, I (2003): Chronology and hazards of large debris flows in the Cheekye River basin, British Columbia, Canada. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 9(2), 99-115, https://doi.org/10.2113/9.2.99
Cleveland, G B (1973): Fire and rain = mudflows, Big Sur, 1972. California Geology, 26, 127-135
Conedera, Marco; Peter, Larissa; Marxer, Peter; Forster, Felix; Rickenmann, Dieter; Re, Lorenza (2003): Consequences of forest fires on the hydrogeological response of mountain catchments: a case study of the Riale Buffaga, Ticino, Switzerland. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 28(2), 117-129, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.425
Conway, S J; Decaulne, A; Balme, M R; Murray, J B; Towner, M C (2010): A new approach to estimating hazard posed by debris flows in the Westfjords of Iceland. Geomorphology, 114(4), 556-572, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.08.015
DeGraff, J V (1997): Geologic investigation of the Pilot Ridge debris flow, Groveland Ranger District, Stanislaus National Forest. USDA Forest Service
Doehring, D O (1968): The effect of fire on geomorphic processes in the San Gabriel Mountains, California. In: R.B. Parker (Editor), Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, 43-65
Fairchild, L H; Wigmosta, M (1983): Dynamic and volumetric characteristics of the 18 May 1980 lahars on the Toutle River, Washington. Proceedings of the Symposium on Erosion Control in Volcanic Areas Tech. Mem. 1908. Japan Public Works Research Institute Ministry of Construction, Tokyo, 131-153
Gabet, E J; Bookter, A (2008): A morphometric analysis of gullies scoured by post-fire progressively bulked debris flows in southwestern Montana, USA. Geomorphology, 96(3-4), 298-309, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.03.016
Gartner, Joseph E (2005): Relations between wildfire related debris-flow volumes and basin morphology, burn severity, material properties and triggering storm rainfall. University of Colorado, 87 pp
Gartner, Joseph E; Bigio, Erica R; Cannon, Susan H (2004): Compilation of post wildfire runoff-event data from the Western United States. U.S. Geological Society Open-File Report 2004-1085, https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1085/
Griswold, J P; Iverson, R M (2008): Mobility statistics and automated hazard mapping for debris flows and rock avalanches. U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA
Helsen, MM; Koop, P J M; van Steijn, H (2002): Magnitude-frequency relationship for debris flows on the fan of the Chalance Torrent, Valgaudemar (French Alps). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 27(12), 1299-1307, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.412
Hungr, Oldrich; McDougall, Scott; Wise, Mike; Cullen, Michael (2008): Magnitude-frequency relationships of debris flows and debris avalanches in relation to slope relief. Geomorphology, 96(3-4), 355-365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.03.020
Iverson, R M; Schilling, S P; Vallance, James W (1998): Objective delineation of lahar-inundation hazard zones. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 110(8), 972-984, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1998)110%3C0972:ODOLIH%3E2.3.CO;2
Klock, G O; Helvey, J D (1976): Debris flows following wildfire in north central Washington. Proceedings of the Third Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, Denver, Colorado, 91-98
Marchi, Lorenzo; Arattano, Massimo; Deganutti, Andrea M (2002): Ten years of debris-flow monitoring in the Mosacardo Torrent (Italian Alps). Geomorphology, 46(1-2), 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00162-3
McDonald, Greg N; Giraud, Richard E (2002): Fire-related debris flows east of Santaquin and Spring Lake, Utah County, Utah. Utah Geological Survey Technical Report 02-09
McNeeley, R; Atkinson, D (1996): Geological Survey of Canada, Radiocarbon dates XXXII. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 1995-G
Meyer, G A; Pierce, J L; Wood, S H; Jull, A J Timothy (2001): Fire, storms, and erosional events in the Idaho batholith. Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 3025-3038, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.389
Morton, D A; Campbell, R H (1974): Spring mudflows at Wrightwood, southern California. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 7, 377-384, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1974.007.04.09
Pierson, Thomas C; Janda, R J; Thouret, J C; Borrero, C A (1990): Perturbation and melting of snow and ice by the 13 November 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz, Columbia, and consequent mobilization, flow, and deposition of lahars. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 41(1-4), 17-66, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(90)90082-Q
Plafker, G; Ericksen, G E (1978): Nevado Huascaran avalanches, Peru. In: B. Voight (Editor), Rockslides and avalanches, vol. 1, Natural Phenomena. Elsevier, New York, 277-314
Rickenmann, Dieter; Zimmermann, Markus (1993): The 1987 debris flows in Switzerland: documentation and analysis. Geomorphology, 8(2-3), 175-189, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(93)90036-2
Riley, Karin L; Bendick, Rebecca; Hyde, Kevin D (2013): Frequency-magnitude distribution of debris flow events compiled from global data, and comparison with post-fire debris flows in the U.S. West. Geomorphology, 191, 118-128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.008
Santi, Paul M; deWolfe, Victor G; Higgins, Jerry D; Cannon, Susan H; Gartner, Joseph E (2008): Sources of debris flow material in burned areas. Geomorphology, 96(3-4), 310-321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.02.022
Scott, Kevin M (1971): Origin and sedimentology of 1969 Debris flows near Glendora, California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 750-C
Sharp, Robert P; Nobles, Laurence H (1953): Mudflow of 1941 at Wrightwood, southern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 64(5), 547-560, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1953)64%5B547:MOAWSC%5D2.0.CO;2
Slosson, J E; Havens, G W; Shuriman, G; Slosson, T L (1989): Harrison Canyon debris flows of 1980. Publications of the Inland Geological Society, 2, 235-298
Stock, Jonathan D; Dietrich, William E (2006): Erosion of steepland valleys by debris flows. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 118(9/10), 1125-1148, https://doi.org/10.1130/B25902.1
Stoffel, Markus (2010): Magnitude-frequency relationships of debris flows - A case study based on field surveys and tree-ring records. Geomorphology, 116(1-2), 67-76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.10.009
Thurber Engineering and Golder Associate (1993): The Cheekye River terrain hazard and land-use study, final report. Report prepared for British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks Burnaby, B.C
Vallance, James W; Scott, Kevin M (1997): The Osceola mudflow from Mount Rainier: sedimentology and hazad implications of a huge clay-rich debris flow. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 109(2), 143-163, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109%3C0143:TOMFMR%3E2.3.CO;2
van Steijn, H (1999): Frequency of hillslope debris flows in the Bachelard Valley (French Alps). In: M. Panizza, M. Soldati, M. Bertacchini, T.W.J. Van Asch and S. Malmusi (Editors), The Erasmus 96-97 Programme in Geomorphology: Intensive Course in the French Alps and Students Mobility. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 15-24
Wells, WG (1987): The effects of fire on the generation of debris flows in southern California. In: J.E. Costa and G.F. Wieczorek (Editors), Geological Society of America Review of Engineering Geology, 105-114
Wieczorek, G F; Harp, E L; Mark, R K; Bhattacharyya, A K (1988): Debris flows and other landslides in San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Contra Costa, Alameda, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Lake, and Yolo counties, and factors influencing debris-flow distribution. In: S.D. Ellen and G.F. Wieczorek (Editors), Landslides, Floods, and Marine Effects of the Storm of January 3-5, 1982, in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1434, 133-162
Comment:
This catalog contains data on 988 debris flow events, compiled from the literature, personal communication with researchers, and original field research. Events are diverse, ranging from runoff-initiated debris flows in the Alps to landslide-initiated debris flows in British Columbia, Canada. Following a number of recent debris flows that followed wildland fires, we concentrated especially on post-fire events (n=264). In order for events to be included in this catalog, an estimate of volume was required. Where data was available, other attributes were also listed, including inundated area, date, initiation mechanism, and wildland fire event.
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
ORDINAL NUMBEROrd NoGeocode
VolumeVolm3
AreaAream2Inundated area
Post-firePost-fire
OriginOrigin
Debris flow identifierDebris flow ID
Method commentMethod commVolume measurement method
Reference/sourceReference
CodeCodeLocation code
10 Area/localityAreaLocation name
11 Sampling dateSampling dateof debris flow event
12 Fire eventFire event
13 CommentComment
Size:
8271 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:


Ord No
 
Vol [m3]
 
Area [m2]

Post-fire

Origin

Debris flow ID

Method comm

Reference

Code
10 
Area
11 
Sampling date
12 
Fire event
13 
Comment
121000.0034000.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingBplanimetric area x average estimated depth of depositCannon, Powers, and Savage (1998)SKMStorm King Mountain, near Glenwood Springs, Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USASeptember 1, 1994South Canyon Fire, July 1994
239600.0064000.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingC,Dplanimetric area x average estimated depth of depositCannon, Powers, and Savage (1998)SKMStorm King Mountain, near Glenwood Springs, Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USASeptember 1, 1994South Canyon Fire, July 1994
31400.004000.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingEplanimetric area x average estimated depth of depositCannon, Powers, and Savage (1998)SKMStorm King Mountain, near Glenwood Springs, Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USASeptember 1, 1994South Canyon Fire, July 1994
44300.0023000.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingFplanimetric area x average estimated depth of depositCannon, Powers, and Savage (1998)SKMStorm King Mountain, near Glenwood Springs, Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USASeptember 1, 1994South Canyon Fire, July 1994
51000.007000.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingGplanimetric area x average estimated depth of depositCannon, Powers, and Savage (1998)SKMStorm King Mountain, near Glenwood Springs, Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USASeptember 1, 1994South Canyon Fire, July 1994
61400.004000.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHplanimetric area x average estimated depth of depositCannon, Powers, and Savage (1998)SKMStorm King Mountain, near Glenwood Springs, Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USASeptember 1, 1994South Canyon Fire, July 1994
71400.004000.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingIplanimetric area x average estimated depth of depositCannon, Powers, and Savage (1998)SKMStorm King Mountain, near Glenwood Springs, Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USASeptember 1, 1994South Canyon Fire, July 1994
82236.036557.30yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-7Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.341 m for this fan made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
9365.781524.10yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-U3Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
10129.17442.36yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-U1Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.292 m for this fan made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
11162.58674.64yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-U2Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.241 m for this fan made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
12248.311034.66yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-1Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
131881.377839.08yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-2Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
141599.536664.72yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-1Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
15151.80632.50yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-2Wbcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
1637.32155.50yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-2Wacalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
17162.78678.28yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-2Wccalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
18471.491964.58yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-4Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
195196.7425226.90yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-5Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.206 m for this fan made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
20928.543868.92yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-3Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
21463.871932.82yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-2Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
22825.413439.24yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-3Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
2398.24722.38yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-4Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.136 m for this fan made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
24991.944133.09yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-6Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
2531.55131.46yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingLC-8Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyLCBitterroot Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
26661.241102.08yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-1Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000volume also estimated by Gabet and Bookter (2008) based on gully morphology; their estimates were given as a range; low=217 m^3, mid=574 m^3, high=987 m^3
27654.511090.86yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-2Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000volume also estimated by Gabet and Bookter (2008) based on gully morphology; their estimates were given as a range; low=593 m^3, mid=1341 m^3, high=2114 m^3
28776.981294.98yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-3Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000volume also estimated by Gabet and Bookter (2008) based on gully morphology; their estimates were given as a range; low=1225 m^3, mid=2867 m^3, high=4729 m^3
29626.881044.81yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-4Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000volume also estimated by Gabet and Bookter (2008) based on gully morphology; their estimates were given as a range; low=412 m^3, mid=1120 m^3, high=1802 m^3
30243.20405.34yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingTBC-1Scalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
3191.36152.27yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-1Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
32637.591062.65yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-2Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
3326.5244.20yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-6Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
34231.28385.47yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-7Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000volume also estimated by Gabet and Bookter (2008) based on gully morphology; their estimates were given as a range; low=530 m^3, mid=1272 m^3, high=2060 m^3
354675.607792.68yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-11Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
36104.81174.69yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-12Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
3718.1730.28yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-13Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
381014.481690.81yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-14Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
3951.7386.22yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-15Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
4010.1416.90yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-16Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
41487.07811.78yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-17Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
42103.97173.29yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-3Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
43349.81583.03yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-10Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
441559.162598.60yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-9Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000volume also estimated by Gabet and Bookter (2008) based on gully morphology; their estimates were given as a range; low=1464 m^3, mid=3655 m^3, high=6031 m^3
45832.521387.54yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-5E-1Scalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
46512.04853.40yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-5E_1Ncalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
4759.9299.87yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSCC-8Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySCCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
48161.12268.54yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-1Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
49374.01623.36yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-12Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
501.402.33yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-10Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
51106.17176.96yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-11Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
52346.76577.94yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-9Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
5370.24117.07yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-2Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
54103.19171.98yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-8Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
55392.54654.24yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-1Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
5633.5255.87yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-2Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
5722.5237.53yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-3Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
5872.99121.66yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-4Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
59191.48319.13yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-6Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
60285.79476.32yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRC-5Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyRCSapphire Mountains, Northern Rocky Mountains, Montana, USASept/Oct 2000 or July 2001Bitterroot Fires of 2000, August 2000
6160000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm1calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
6253000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm2calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
6351000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm3calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
6436000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm4calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
659000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm5calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
6649000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm6calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
6741000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm7calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
6851000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm8calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
6951000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm9calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
7047000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm10calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
7124000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm11calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
729000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm12calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
7319000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm13calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
7451000.00nofire-hose effect during intense rainstorm14calculated from deposit planimetric area and estimation of thickness along cross-sectionsHelsen, Koop, and van Steijn (2002)CTChalance Torrent, French Alps
75550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
76550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
77550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
78550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
79550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
80550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
81550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
82550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
83550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
84550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
85550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
86550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
87550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
88550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
89550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
90550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes' estimates overlap
91550.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
921000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
931000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
941000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
951000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
961000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
971000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
981000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
991000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1001000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1011000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1021000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1031000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1041000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1051000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1061000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1071000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1081000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1091900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1101900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1111900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1121900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1131900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1141900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1151900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1161900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1171900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1181900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1191900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1201900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1211900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1221900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1231900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1241900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1251900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1261900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1271900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1281900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1291900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1301900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1311900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1321900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1331900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1341900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1351900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1361900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1371900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1381900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1391900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1401900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1411900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1421900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1431900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1441900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1451900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1461900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1471900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1481900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1491900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1501900.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1512750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1522750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1532750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1542750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1552750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1562750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1572750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1582750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1592750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1602750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1612750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1622750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1632750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1642750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1652750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1662750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1672750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1682750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1692750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1702750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1712750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1722750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1732750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1742750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1752750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1762750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1772750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1782750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1792750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1802750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1812750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1822750.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1833800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1843800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1853800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1863800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1873800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1883800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1893800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1903800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1913800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1923800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1933800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1943800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1953800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1963800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1973800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1983800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
1993800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2003800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2013800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2023800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2033800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2043800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2053800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2063800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2073800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2083800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2093800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2103800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2113800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2123800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2133800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2144850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2154850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2164850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2174850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2184850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2194850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2204850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2214850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2224850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2234850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2244850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2254850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2264850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2274850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2284850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2294850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2304850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2314850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2324850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2334850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2344850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2354850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2364850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2374850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2384850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2394850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2404850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2414850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2424850.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2435800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2445800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2455800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2465800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2475800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2485800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2495800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2505800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2515800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2525800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2535800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2545800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2555800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2565800.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2576650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2586650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2596650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2606650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2616650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2626650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2636650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2646650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2656650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2666650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2676650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2686650.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
2697600.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
27010000.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
27111200.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
27212400.00norunoff-initiated/progressive bulkinglength of channel x average cross-sectionvan Steijn (1999)FAFrench AlpsDebris flow activity (1800-1987) specified for magnitude classes as indicated by track length of deposit in Bachelard Valley of the French Alps. Volume figures represent mean volume estimated from track length after Innes (1983). Innes´ estimates overlap
273864308.00yesBadger Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
2744510.00yesSilverwood Mcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was identical
2756763.00yesSilverwood Ocomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 6119 m^3
2761622.00yesCleghorn Basincomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 1528 m^3
277801771.00yesCucamonga Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
278611480.00yesDay Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
279382383.00yesDeer Creek Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
28033304.00yesDemens Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
281488463.00yesDevils Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
28222470.00yesDevorecomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 24,937 m^3
2836116.00yesHarrison Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
28423683.00yesLittle Sand Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
285570.00yesLytle Creek AQcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 561 m^3
286683.00yesLytle Creek Hourglasscomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was identical
28710387.00yesLytle Creek Wcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 24,937 m^3
2882316.00yesBasin Ncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
2891788.00yesOak Creek Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
29031817.00yesBasin Pecomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was identical
29122801.00yesBasin Pwcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 22,826 m^3
2924832.00yesBasin Xcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 4341 m^3
2931094.00yesBasin XXcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 1094 m^3
29435155.00yesSand Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
29559144.00yesSawpit Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 59,281 m^3
2963802.00yesSweetwater Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was identical
297116667.00yesSycamore Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
298203526.00yesWaterman Basincomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
2992226.00yesWatertank Basincomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 2218 m^3
3008542.00yesSawpit Acomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsSanti et al. (2008)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
30114143.00yesSawpit Bcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsSanti et al. (2008)GPOFsouthern California, USAGrand Prix/Old Fire, October - November 2003
3021691.00yesBasin J^3computed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)California, USAGaviota Fire, June 2004volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 6293 m^3
3031315.00yesBasin VPNcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)California, USAGaviota Fire, June 2004volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was identical, location listed as Gaviota S
304444.00yesEl Capitan Icomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)San Diego County, California, USAParadise/Cedar Fire, October 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 441 m^3
305383.00yesEl Capitan IIcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)San Diego County, California, USAParadise/Cedar Fire, October 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 382 m^3
3061387.00yesBasin Acomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)CSFnear Glenwood Springs, Colorado, USACoal Seam Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 1391 m^3
307325.00yesBasin Hcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)CSFnear Glenwood Springs, Colorado, USACoal Seam Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 325 m^3
308574.00yesBasin Gcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)CSFnear Glenwood Springs, Colorado, USACoal Seam Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 574 m^3
309237.00yesBasin Fcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)CSFnear Glenwood Springs, Colorado, USACoal Seam Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 250 m^3
310284.00yesBasin Ocomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)CSFnear Glenwood Springs, Colorado, USACoal Seam Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 260 m^3
311257.00yesBasin Lcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)CSFnear Glenwood Springs, Colorado, USACoal Seam Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 257 m^3
3121331.00yesRoot Creekcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)MRFnear Durango, Colorado, USAMissionary Ridge Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 1476 m^3
313752.00yesGut Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)MRFnear Durango, Colorado, USAMissionary Ridge Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 818 m^3
3144219.00yesBasin 23computed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)MRFnear Durango, Colorado, USAMissionary Ridge Fire, June 2002
3152846.00yesMeyer Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)MRFnear Durango, Colorado, USAMissionary Ridge Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 3485 m^3
3166496.00yesWoodard Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)MRFnear Durango, Colorado, USAMissionary Ridge Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 6541 m^3
3175349.00yesElkhorn Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)MRFnear Durango, Colorado, USAMissionary Ridge Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 5493 m^3
31823571.00yesHaflin Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)MRFnear Durango, Colorado, USAMissionary Ridge Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 23,967 m^3
31915782.00yesKroeger Canyoncomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)MRFnear Durango, Colorado, USAMissionary Ridge Fire, June 2002volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 8324 m^3
320448.00yesEycomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsSanti et al. (2008)MRFnear Durango, Colorado, USAMissionary Ridge Fire, June 2002
321174.00yesTowercomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)Front Range, Colorado, USAOverland Fire, October 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 174 m^3
322312.00yesPost Officecomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)Front Range, Colorado, USAOverland Fire, October 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 4119 m^3
323951.00yesHeil Ranch 2computed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)Front Range, Colorado, USAOverland Fire, October 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 951 m^3
3241515.00yesCompton Bench Mcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)WMFWasatch Mountains, Utah, USAApril 6, 2004Farmington Fire, July 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was identical
325511.00yesCompton Bench Scomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)WMFWasatch Mountains, Utah, USAApril 6, 2004Farmington Fire, July 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was identical
326597.00yesIntake Basincomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)WMFWasatch Mountains, Utah, USAApril 6, 2004Farmington Fire, July 2003volume was also reported by Santi et al (2008), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure was 3311 m^3
3273732.00yesrainfall-induced, runoff-initiatedBasin #2computed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)WMFWasatch Mountains, Utah, USASeptember 12, 2002Mollie Fire, August 2001volume of this event was also reported by McDonald and Giraud (2002) based on measurements of fan deposit area and thickness, their figure was 4205 m^3, as well as by Santi et al (2007), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figure
3286220.00yesrainfall-induced, runoff-initiatedBasin #3computed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)WMFWasatch Mountains, Utah, USASeptember 12, 2002Mollie Fire, August 2001volume of this event was also reported by McDonald and Giraud (2002) based on measurements of fan deposit area and thickness, their figure was 1682 m^3; as well as by Santi et al (2007), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions; their figure
3297040.00yesrainfall-induced, runoff-initiatedBasin #4computed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)WMFWasatch Mountains, Utah, USASeptember 12, 2002Mollie Fire, August 2001volume of this event was also reported by McDonald and Giraud (2002) based on measurements of fan deposit area and thickness, their figure was 15,292 m^3; as well as by Santi et al (2007), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figu
3303047.00yesrainfall-induced, runoff-initiatedBasin #5computed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)WMFWasatch Mountains, Utah, USASeptember 12, 2002Mollie Fire, August 2001volume of this event was also reported by McDonald and Giraud (2002) based on measurements of fan deposit area and thickness, their figure was 9,940 m^3; as well as by Santi et al (2007), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figur
3315289.00yesrainfall-induced, runoff-initiatedBasin #6computed from a series of channel cross-sectionsGartner (2005)WMFWasatch Mountains, Utah, USASeptember 12, 2002Mollie Fire, August 2001volume of this event was also reported by McDonald and Giraud (2002) based on measurements of fan deposit area and thickness, their figure was 7,646 m^3; as well as by Santi et al (2007), based on successive measurements of channel dimensions, their figur
332810.00yesrainfall-induced, runoff-initiatedBuckley Drawcomputed from a series of channel cross-sectionsSanti et al. (2008)WMFWasatch Mountains, Utah, USAMollie Fire, August 2001
33313500.00yesrainfall-induced, runoff-initiatedDorothy Ryan CanyonWohl and Pearthree (1991), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)Huachuca Mountains, ArizonaJuly 11, 1988
33410000.00yesrainfall-induced, runoff-initiatedManzanita CanyonWohl and Pearthree (1991), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)Huachuca Mountains, ArizonaJuly 11, 1988
33528900.00yesrainfall-inducedDelta CanyonEaton (1935), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACLos Angeles County, California, USA1914
33636000.00yesrainfall-inducedBrand CanyonEaton (1935), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACLos Angeles County, California, USANovember 14, 1928
33724466.00yesrainfall-inducedHaines CanyonEaton (1935), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACLos Angeles County, California, USADecember 30, 1933 - January 1, 1934
33870339.00yesrainfall-inducedVerdugoEaton (1935), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACLos Angeles County, California, USADecember 30, 1933 - January 1, 1934
33918000.00yeslandslide and runoff-initiated debris flowGlencoe HeightsScott (1971), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACGlendora, California, USAJanuary 18-27, 19691968recorded as > 18,000 m^3
34013700.00yeslandslide and runoff-initiated debris flowRainbow DriveScott (1971), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACGlendora, California, USAJanuary 18-27, 19691968recorded as > 13,700 m^3
34119267.00yeslandslide and runoff-initiated debris flowEast Hook CanyonScott (1971), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACGlendora, California, USAJanuary 18-27, 19691968
34240109.00yeslandslide and runoff-initiated debris flowHarrow CanyonScott (1971), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACGlendora, California, USAJanuary 18-27, 19691968
34334252.00yeslandslide and runoff-initiated debris flowEnglewild CanyonScott (1971), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACGlendora, California, USAJanuary 18-27, 19691968
34411422.00yeslandslide and runoff-initiated debris flowEast Hook CanyonScott (1971), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACGlendora, California, USAFebruary 22-25, 19691968
3458284.00yeslandslide and runoff-initiated debris flowHarrow CanyonScott (1971), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACGlendora, California, USAFebruary 22-25, 19691968
34611682.00yeslandslide and runoff-initiated debris flowEnglewild CanyonScott (1971), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)LACGlendora, California, USAFebruary 22-25, 19691968
347300000.00yesrainfall-inducedM.F. Mill CreekWells (1987), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)Hidden Springs, California,USAFebruary 9-10, 1978Middle Fire, 1977
3483000.00yesrainfall-inducedPheneger CreekCleveland (1972), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)Big Sur, California, USANovember 15, 1972Molera Fire, 1972volume listed as several 1000 m^3
349600.00yesrainfall-inducedCarter Canyon (Bailey Canyon)Wells (1987), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)Sierra Madre, California, USANovember 10-11, 1978Mountain Trail Fire, 1978volume listed as 500-700 m^3
3503000.00yesrainfall-inducedLas Flores CanyonBooker (1998), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)California, USAFebruary 20, 1994Old Topanga Fire, 1993
35111468.00yesrainfall-inducedHarrison CanyonSlosson et al. (1989), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)San Bernadino, California, USAJanuary 9, 1980
35245109.00yesrainfall-inducedHarrison CanyonSlosson et al. (1989), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)San Bernadino, California, USAJanuary 14, 1980
35374872.00yesrainfall-inducedWest Fork of San Dimas CanyonDoehring (1968), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)San Dimas Experimental Forest, California, USANovember 5, 1960
354459.00yesrainfall and landslide-intiatedUnnamed tributary to South Fork Toulomne RiverDeGraff (1997), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)California, USAJanuary 2, 1997Stanislaus Complex Fire, 198
35516100.00yesregional rain on snow event produced landslide-initiated debris flowHopkins Creekadding colluvium volume eroded and channel alluvium volume erodedMeyer et al. (2001)South Fork Payette River, Stanislaus National Forest, Idaho, USADecember 31, 1996 - January 1, 1997Lowman Fire, 1989volume of deposit estimated as 13.400 m^3
35614600.00yesregional rain on snow event produced landslide-initiated debris flowJughead Creekadding colluvium volume eroded and channel alluvium volume erodedMeyer et al. (2001)South Fork Payette River, Stanislaus National Forest, Idaho, USADecember 31, 1996 - January 1, 1997Lowman Fire, 1989volume of deposit estimated as 4,030 m^3
3571000.00yesrapid snowmelt produced landslide and runoff-initiated debris flowPreston CreekKlock and Helvey (1976), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)Entiat Valley, Washington, USAMarch 1972
3583000.00yesrapid snowmelt produced landslide and runoff-initiated debris flowMcCree CreekKlock and Helvey (1976), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)Entiat Valley, Washington, USAMarch 1972volume listed as Several 1000 m^3
3593000.00yesrapid snowmelt produced landslide and runoff-initiated debris flowFox CreekKlock and Helvey (1976), as cited in Gartner, Bigio, and Cannon (2004)Entiat Valley, Washington, USAMarch 1972volume listed as Several 1000 m^3
360100000000.00nolandslide from earthquakeNevados HuascaranPlafker and Ericksen (1978), as cited in Iverson (1997)PeruMay 31, 1970volume accurate only to within an order of magnitude
3611000000.00landslide, rapid winter snowmeltHeath CanyonSharp and Nobles (1953), as cited in Iverson (1997)Wrightwood, California, USAMay 7, 1941volume accurate only to within an order of magnitude
3621000000.00noglacier breakout floodSeparation Creekcited in Iverson (1997)Three Sisters, Oregon, USA1933volume accurate only to within an order of magnitude
363100000.00landslide, rapid winter snowmeltHeath CanyonMorton and Campbell (1974), as cited in Iverson (1997)Wrightwood, California, USAMay 1969volume accurate only to within an order of magnitude
364100000.00landslideWhitehouse CreekWieczorek et al. (1988) as cited in Iverson (1997)Santa Cruz, California, USAJanuary 4, 1982volume accurate only to within an order of magnitude
36510000000.001900000.00Upper Lillooet Rivercited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canadaapproximately 1100 AD
3663000000.00Klattasine Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern Rockies, British Columbia, Canada1971-1973
3673000000.00200000.00Devastation Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1931
3682000000.001300000.00mass failureCaraballeda Fan/Sierra de Avilacited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Vargas State, VenezuelaDecember 1, 1999
3691600000.00Sesa Landslide/Grigna Valleycited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Bienno, northern Italy1993
3701200000.00nomass failure in periglacial colluviumCapricorn Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Mount Meager, British Columbia, Canada1998
3711000000.00570000.00nomass failureOphir Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Washoe County, Nevada, USAMay 1983
3721000000.00Turbid Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1984
373200300.0072800.00Shadow Canyoncited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)vicinity of Boulder, Colorado, USA
374200000.0070000.00Capricorn Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1972
375195000.00160000.00Bullock Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Mt. Thomas, New ZealandApr 78
376180000.0090000.00St. Peter´s Domecited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Columbia Gorge, Oregon, USA01- Nov
377162700.0059200.00Fern Canyoncited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)vicinity of Boulder, Colorado, USA
378150000.00Sourgrass Debris Flowcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Sierra Nevadas, California, USAJanuary 1, 1997
379136000.0077000.00noflood from glacial lake breachCathedral Mountaincited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern Rockies, British Columbia, CanadaSeptember 6, 1978
38092000.00140000.00Hummingbird Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Mara Lake, British Columbia, CanadaJuly 11, 1997
38190000.0050000.00noflood from glacial lake breachCathedral Mountaincited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern Rockies, British Columbia, CanadaAugust 16, 1946
38287000.0052000.00noflood from glacial lake breachCathedral Mountaincited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern Rockies, British Columbia, CanadaAugust 29, 1984
38380000.0040000.00noflood from glacial lake breachCathedral Mountaincited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern Rockies, British Columbia, CanadaAugust 5, 1925
38480000.00100000.00West Dodsoncited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Columbia Gorge, Oregon, USA
38576000.00470000.00nomass failurePotallie Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Mount Hood, Oregon, USADecember 25, 1980
38663000.00Pierce Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern British Columbia, CanadaNovember 28,1995
38760000.0035000.00Hot Springs Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1984
38855000.00Wahleach Acited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada
38950000.00Hope Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern Rockies, British Columbia, CanadaNovember 8, 1995
39050000.0021000.00Boundary Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1987
39125000.0018000.00Boundary Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1989
39224000.0012000.00noflood from glacial lake breachCathedral Mountaincited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern Rockies, British Columbia, CanadaJuly 1, 1962
39320000.0010000.00Canyon Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1990
39420000.007000.00Lower Ryan R. tributarycited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1984
39520000.00Mt. Currie gullycited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1989
39620000.00M-Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada
39720000.00Charles Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada
39817000.0016000.00norockfall during intense rain, periglacialMayflowercited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Tenmile Range, Colorado, USAAugust 18, 1961
39910000.005000.00No Good Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1990
40010000.008000.00Canyon Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1987
4019990.002180.00landslide initiating in glacial debris, clearcut from old growth in early 20th centuryBlack Cr./FR 23from dimensions of deposit in fieldcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008), from Stock and Dietrich (2006)Olympic Mountains, Washington, USA1997?
4027000.005000.00noflood from glacial lake breachCathedral Mountaincited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern Rockies, British Columbia, CanadaAugust 18, 1982
4036000.00McGillivray Cr. Gullycited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1989
4046000.001540.00nowinter storms initiated landslide in hollowMarlow #1from dimensions of deposit in fieldcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008), from Stock and Dietrich (2006)Coast Range, Oregon, USA1996
4055000.005000.00noflood from glacial lake breachCathedral Mountaincited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)southern Rockies, British Columbia, CanadaAugust 27, 1984
4065000.008600.00soil-slip (ravine fill)-debris flowNewton Canyoncited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Santa Monica Mountains, California, USADecember 29, 1965
4075000.007500.00Boundary Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1988
4084800.002400.00thunderstormsSlide Cr.from dimensions of deposit in fieldcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008), from Stock and Dietrich (2006)San Bernadinos, California, USA1999
4093500.00Fountain Ridge gullycited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1989
4103390.002110.00Slump Acrescited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Coast Range, Oregon, USA
4113000.001570.00Tom McDonald Creekcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)California (Redwood Creek basin), USADecember 16, 1982
4122300.00Oddstadcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)California, USA
4132000.00Lillooet R., east fancited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1989
4141835.00Joe´s Canyonfrom dimensions of deposit in fieldStock and Dietrich (2006)WMWasatch, Utah, USA1998
4151100.00winter stormsSullivan 1from dimensions of deposit in fieldStock and Dietrich (2006)Coast Range, Oregon, USA1996
4161050.00230.00yeslandslide? clearfelled in 1978, burnt in 1980Maimaicited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)New Zealand1988
417800.00nowinter storms initiated landslide in hollowMarlow #2from dimensions of deposit in fieldStock and Dietrich (2006)Coast Range, Oregon, USA1996
418690.00492.00Slump Acres 2cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Coast Range, Oregon, USA
419660.00621.00nowinter storms initiated landslide in hollowMarlow #3from dimensions of deposit in fieldcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008), from Stock and Dietrich (2006)Coast Range, Oregon, USA1996
420660.00Big Bendcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)California, USA
421610.00Yosemite sitecited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)California, USA
422300.002000.00B1cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)California, USA
423200.00Angel B gullycited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada
424200.00cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)United Kingdom
425150.00260.00soil-slip (ravine fill)-debris flowOld Topanga Canyoncited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Santa Monica Mountains, California, USAJanuary 26, 1969
426135.00240.00nowinter storms initiated landslide in hollowMarlow#4from dimensions of deposit in fieldcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008), from Stock and Dietrich (2006)Coast Range, Oregon, USA1996
427100.00100.00No Good Cr.cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)British Columbia, Canada1988
428100.00600.00N32cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Nigel Pass, Canada
42927.87200.00noLevan debris flowcited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Utah, USA
43010.00200.00N2cited in Griswold and Iverson (2008)Nigel Pass, Canada
431532.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationNP1scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
43228.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationLVscar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
433822.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationPT3scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
4341264.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationKS2scar measured from a series of cross-sections in fieldCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
435343.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP6scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
436279.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP9scar measured from a series of cross-sections in fieldCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
437163.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP12scar measured from a series of cross-sections in fieldCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
43895.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationFD2scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
439173.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationFD5scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
440288.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationTC1scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
441424.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationpt1scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
442110.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationbP4scar measured from a series of cross-sections in fieldCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
443481.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP5scar measured from a series of cross-sections in fieldCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
44486.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP15scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
445219.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationFD1scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
44654.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationFD3scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
44742.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationFD4scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
44832.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP10Xscar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
449747.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP10scar measured from a series of cross-sections in fieldCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
4501203.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP11scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
451220.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationKS1scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
45295.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP4scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
453186.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP7scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
454144.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationBP8scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
45560.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationMA2scar measured from a series of cross-sections in fieldCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
45664.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationMA1scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
457160.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationKS3scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
4583.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationMA3scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
4591142.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationpt2scar measured from aerial photographCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
46029824.00nolandslide from heavy precipitationTC2scar measured from a series of cross-sections in fieldCannon (1989)WMWasatch Front and Plateau, Utah, USA1983-1984
461162.84nostorm-induced landslide6air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.4Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
462154.62nostorm-induced landslide7air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.5Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
46377.88nostorm-induced landslide8field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
464142.73nostorm-induced landslide11air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.4Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
465134.49nostorm-induced landslide15air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.5Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
466111.32nostorm-induced landslide18air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.6Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
46790.59nostorm-induced landslide19air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.7Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
468117.64nostorm-induced landslide21air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.8Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
469683.92nostorm-induced landslide22field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
470279.80nostorm-induced landslide26field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
471121.49nostorm-induced landslide28field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
472108.40nostorm-induced landslide29field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
473392.26nostorm-induced landslide32air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.4Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
474166.09nostorm-induced landslide33air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.5Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
47524.94nostorm-induced landslide34air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.6Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
47678.30nostorm-induced landslide35air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.7Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
477141.43nostorm-induced landslide36air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.8Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
478142.73nostorm-induced landslide45field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
479937.95nostorm-induced landslide46field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
480159.78nostorm-induced landslide47field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
481236.98nostorm-induced landslide48field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
482149.67nostorm-induced landslide50field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
483172.12nostorm-induced landslide52field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
484107.10nostorm-induced landslide53air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.4Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
485151.37nostorm-induced landslide54air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.5Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
486117.64nostorm-induced landslide55air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.6Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
487336.78nostorm-induced landslide56air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.7Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
488154.00nostorm-induced landslide60air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.8Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
489316.22nostorm-induced landslide63field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
490187.33nostorm-induced landslide64field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
491952.54nostorm-induced landslide65air photo measurement of area, vol=3.1*area+285.8Sue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
49250.97nostorm-induced landslide51field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAJanuary 1, 1991
49398.15nostorm-induced landslide68field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAMarch 1991
494227.55nostorm-induced landslide69field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAMarch 1991
495140.83nostorm-induced landslide70field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAMarch 1991
49660.74nostorm-induced landslide71field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAMarch 1991
4977.92nostorm-induced landslide74field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAMarch 1991
49822.65nostorm-induced landslide75field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAMarch 1991
49929.96nostorm-induced landslide76field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAMarch 1991
500553.25nostorm-induced landslide77field measurement of landslide scarSue Cannon, personal communicationOHOahu, Hawaii, USAMarch 1991
5012835.804726.34yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingFJC-1Scalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyFourth-of-July Creek, Idaho, USA
5022031.863386.44noSC-1Ncalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySmiley Creek, Sawtooth Mountains, Idaho, USA
503332.65554.43noSC-2Ncalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studySmiley Creek, Sawtooth Mountains, Idaho, USA
5048013.4213355.70nofirehose effect and flow concentration from rock amphitheatreFC-1Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyFrenchman Creek, Sawtooth Mountains, Idaho, USA
5053.966.61yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingROC-7Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
506115.50192.51yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingROC-8Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
507174.87291.45yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingROC-6Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
508138.01230.02yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingROC-4Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
509212.58354.31yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingROC-3Wcalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
510587.27978.79yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingROC-4Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
511107.49179.16yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingROC-3Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
51233.1155.19yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingROC-2Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
513559.94933.24yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingROC-1Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
51428.5347.55yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingKC-5Scalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
5150.440.74yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingKC-1Scalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
516122.60204.33yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingKC-3Scalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
517276.20460.34yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingKC-4Scalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth estimate of 0.6 mthis studyROCRooks Creek, near Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
5183103.6012931.70yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulking`calculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyWSCWarm Spring Creek, Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
519205.53856.37yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWSC-2Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyWSCWarm Spring Creek, Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
5201520.876336.98yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWSC-3Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyWSCWarm Spring Creek, Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
5211109.604623.35yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWSC-4Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyWSCWarm Spring Creek, Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
522379.401580.84yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWSC-5Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyWSCWarm Spring Creek, Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
523132.50552.09yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWSC-7Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyWSCWarm Spring Creek, Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
5241388.655786.08yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWSC-6Ecalculated from planimetric area of deposit measured in field with kinematic GPS multiplied by average depth measurement of 0.24 m for Laird Creek area made by Bothethis studyWSCWarm Spring Creek, Ketchum, Idaho, USAJune 2009Castle Rock Fire, August - September, 2007
525550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
526550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
527550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
528550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
529550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
530550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
531550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
532550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
533550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
534550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
535550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
536550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
537550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
538550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
539550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
540550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
541550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
542550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
543550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
544550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
545550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
546550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
547550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
548550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
549550.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5503000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alps1994volume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5513000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alps2002volume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5523000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alps2008volume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5533000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5543000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5553000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5563000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5573000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5583000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5593000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5603000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5613000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5623000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5633000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5643000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5653000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5663000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5673000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5683000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5693000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5707500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5717500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5727500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5737500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5747500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5757500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5767500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5777500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5787500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5797500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5807500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5817500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5827500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
5837500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
58430000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
58530000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss Alpsvolume estimate represents midpoint of bin
58660000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedestimated from lobe dimensions and lobe countStoffel (2010)RTRitigraben Torrent, Swiss AlpsSep 93volume estimate represents midpoint of bin
58719000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsAugust 13, 1991
5883250.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsSeptember 30, 1991
5895800.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsSeptember 1, 1992
5905600.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsNovember 7, 1993
591730.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsJuly 19, 1993
5926500.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsJuly 20, 1993
5933800.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsSeptember 14,1993
59416800.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsJune 22, 1996
59565800.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsJuly 8, 1996
5963000.00nosummer rainfall-inducedinstrument measurement of flow velocity and cross-sectional area of channelMarchi, Arattano, and Deganutti (2002)MTMoscardo Torrent, Italian AlpsJune 27, 1997
5972800000.00no evidence for fire (charcoal not found within deposit)mobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide1ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Clague et al. (2003), as cited in Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada11,600 YBPMinimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
598650000.00no evidence for fire (charcoal not found within deposit)mobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide2ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Thurber and Golder (1993), as cited in Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada9300 YBPMinimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
5992800000.00no evidence for fire (charcoal not found within deposit)mobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide3ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Thurber and Golder (1993) and Clague et al. (2003), as cited in Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada6900 YBPMinimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
600200000.00no evidence for fire (charcoal not found within deposit)mobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide4ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Clague et al. (2003), as cited in Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada5600 YBPMinimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
601200000.00no evidence for fire (charcoal not found within deposit)mobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide5ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **McNeeley and Atkinson (1996), as cited in Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada2200 YBPMinimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
602190000.00no evidence for fire (charcoal not found within deposit)mobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide6ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Thurber and Golder (1993) and McNeely and Atkinson (1996), as cited in Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canadaapprox. 400 A.D.Minimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
6033250000.00no evidence for fire (charcoal not found within deposit)mobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide7ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canadaapprox. 1250 A.D.Minimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
604500000.00no evidence for fire (charcoal not found within deposit)mobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide8ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **McNeeley and Atkinson (1996), as cited in Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canadaapprox. 1350 A.D.Minimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
605460000.00no evidence for fire (charcoal not found within deposit)mobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide9ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada1878-1879Minimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
606660000.00nomobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide10ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada1920-1921Minimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
607365000.00nomobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide11ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada1939-1940Minimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
608310000.00nomobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide12ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada1991Minimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
609150000.00nomobilized from post-deglaciation rockfall, or rainfall-induced small rockslide13ground-penetrating radar, excavation and radio-carbon dating, and/or modeled estimate based on peak flow **Jakob and Friele (2010)CRCheekye River fan, British Columbia, Canada2009Minimum, maximum, and mean volume estimates given. Mean is reported here.
61010000.00noAlbeuveDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 29, 1990
61115000.00noAllenbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 7, 1992
612200000.00noAlmagellerbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 21, 1953
61362000.00nointense rainstormsArieschbachestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 3, 1987
6147500.00noBõchlibachestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1921
6152000.00nointense rainstormsBõzbergestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6163000.00noBodenrusDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJune 24, 1992
6171500.00noBrandegggrabenDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 31, 1995
61814000.00noBrõschgenbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 16, 1938
6192000.00nointense rainstormsCambrena 1estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
6204000.00nointense rainstormsCambrena 2estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
6215000.00nointense rainstormsCaralestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
6222500.00noChucheligrabenDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 27, 1994
6234000.00nointense rainstormsCh?eboden (Obergoms)estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6242000.00nointense rainstormsCristallinaestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 25, 1987
62528000.00noDorfbach (Randa)Dieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 10, 1935
6265000.00noDorfbach (Randa)Dieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJune 2, 1992
62715000.00noDorfbach (Randa)Dieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 8, 1991
628450000.00noDurnagelbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1944
6292000.00nointense rainstormsEiestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
63030000.00noErlibachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandMay 11, 1907
6316000.00noFalchernbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJune 1, 1995
632125000.00noFõllbach Saas BalenDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 8, 1970
633400000.00noFõllbach Saas BalenDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 2, 1968
6344500.00noFirschlachtgrabenDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandMay 2, 1995
63530000.00noFormiei (Formigario)Dieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandSeptember 13, 1993
6361000.00nointense rainstormsGõndliplanggeestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6373000.00nointense rainstormsGane di Vieiestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6381000.00noGeissgassrusDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandApril 7, 1993
63938000.00nointense rainstormsGerental 14aestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
64070000.00nointense rainstormsGerental 16estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6417500.00nointense rainstormsGerental 17estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
642280000.00noGiswiler LauiDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJune 24, 1739
6435000.00nointense rainstormsGonerli (Obergoms)estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6443300.00noGrand CombeDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJune 21, 1995
6454000.00nointense rainstormsGrõtschliecht 1estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6461000.00nointense rainstormsGross Bandestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
64720000.00nointense rainstormsGrosstalestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
64814000.00noGuppenrunsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 7, 1989
649200000.00noG?rbeDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 29, 1990
6501000.00noHauetenbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1994
6517000.00nointense rainstormsHeugandtalestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6521000.00nointense rainstormsHeutalestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6535500.00noLangweidbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 24, 1992
65415000.00noLeimbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandSeptember 3, 1969
6551500.00noLeiterhorngrabenDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 21, 1992
656100000.00noLouigrabeDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandSeptember 24, 1994
6577500.00nointense rainstormsLucendroestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
65860000.00noMaschõnserr?feDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 31, 1995
65966000.00nointense rainstormsMinstigerbachestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
66030000.00noMont DolentDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 10, 1990
6613000.00nointense rainstormsM?listein 2 (Obergoms)estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
66240000.00noNant du PissotDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 13, 1995
66350000.00noNollaDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandMay 13, 1711
664100000.00noNollaDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandNovember 11, 1807
6651000.00nointense rainstormsOber Lipfersteinestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6661000.00nointense rainstormsPescioraestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6675000.00noRõmsenrunseDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 21, 1989
6684000.00nointense rainstormsRi di Bedrettoestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
66925000.00nointense rainstormsRi di Cavannaestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
67028000.00noRi di Foi÷iDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 31, 1992
6714000.00nointense rainstormsRi di Gallinosoestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
67235000.00nointense rainstormsRi di Roncoestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6739000.00nointense rainstormsRichlerenestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6749000.00noRio de la VausseresseDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandFebruary 2, 1995
67510000.00noRitigrabeDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandSeptember 24, 1994
67660000.00noRitigrabeDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandSeptember 24, 1993
677210000.00nointense rainstormsSaasbach 1 (Obergoms)estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
67850000.00nointense rainstormsSaxetbachestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 3, 1987
67912000.00noSchiabachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 14, 1995
6802500.00noSchusslauizugDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 31, 1992
68115000.00nointense rainstormsStegenbachestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 15, 1987
6824000.00noSteinlauibachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandApril 24, 1995
6831000.00nointense rainstormsStocklammeestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
68430000.00noTõschbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJune 13, 1957
6852800.00noTollrusDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 13 , 1995
6864000.00nointense rainstormsTr?tzitalestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
6873200.00noTschingelmadDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 3, 1995
6882000.00noT?rlisrus / MeerenbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 28, 1990
6892000.00nointense rainstormsUlmitalestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
69050000.00nointense rainstormsVal Cantone di Dosd?estimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
691270000.00nointense rainstormsVal da Plauncaestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
6924000.00noVal FileitDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandMay 25, 1977
6932500.00noVal GrondaDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 1, 1995
69425000.00nointense rainstormsVal la Buoraestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
6952000.00nointense rainstormsVal Plattasestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
69650000.00noVal SinzeraDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 7, 1962
69724000.00nointense rainstormsVal Sinzeraestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
69810000.00nointense rainstormsVal Tempestaestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
69912000.00nointense rainstormsVal Tortaestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
70050000.00nointense rainstormsVal Zavragiaestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
701215000.00nointense rainstormsVarunaestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 18, 1987
70265000.00nointense rainstormsVarunaestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
70355000.00noWildibachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 19, 1933
70456000.00nointense rainstormsWittenwasserenestimated from stereographic aerial photographsDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandAugust 24, 1987
7051400.00noW?estrusDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 31, 1995
706100000.00noZanaibachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 29, 1990
70715000.00noZelgbachDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJune 12, 1991
7086500.00noZellergrabenDieter Rickenmann, personal communication; see also Rickenmann and Zimmermann (1993)SWSwitzerlandJuly 27, 1994
7091120.00no101summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
710895.20no102summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
711207.90no103summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
712377.20no105summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
713861.00no210summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
714441.00no212summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7153164.50no214summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
716235.00no217summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7171060.00no301summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
718510.60no302summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
719418.10no303summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7201849.30no307summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
721483.00no409summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
722261.00no417summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7233044.00no420summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7241325.00no423summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
725880.40no427summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
726372.00no428summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
727242.40no451summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
728608.00no461summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
729775.60no462summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
730582.00no463summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7312399.50no465summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
732256.00no505summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
733367.50no601summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
734346.50no603summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7351341.10no604summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
736247.00no605summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
737319.00no701summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7381245.00no702summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7391470.00no703summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
740139.90no704summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
741476.00no706summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
742247.20no801summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
743384.00no802summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
744480.00no803summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
745381.00no804summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
746225.00no805summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
747450.10no901summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
748768.00no1001summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
749302.50no1002summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
750469.60no1003summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
751240.00no1004summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
752161.60no1005summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
753453.60no1014summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
754461.00no1018summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7551050.50no1019summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
756235.50no1026summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
757179.00no1027summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7581036.00no1028summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7591139.50no1102summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7604275.00no1201summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
761350.40no1202summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
762405.50no1203summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7631369.20no1204summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
764182.40no1205summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7651291.40no1206summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
766182.50no1208summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
767120.50no1209summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
768260.10no1210summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7692850.60no1211summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
770720.00no1212summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
771779.10no1302summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7721693.00no1402summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
773701.00no1403summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7744051.60no1501summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
775987.20no1610summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
776664.00no1611summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
777555.00no1612summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
778249.00no1613summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
779312.00no1614summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7807030.00no1619summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
781952.60no1621summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
782640.00no1623summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
783300.00no1704summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
784124.80no1705summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7851088.50no1707summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
786112.20no1807summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
787408.00no1808summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
788584.50no1809summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7891737.00no1810summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
790211.30no1815summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7911610.60no1901summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
792400.00no1903summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
793253.70no1905summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
794687.90no1907summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
795343.30no1909summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7961352.10no1912summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7971760.60no1914summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
7983578.00no1915summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
799346.50no1916summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8002062.60no1917summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
801671.00no1918summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
802373.20no1919summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
803270.00no1925summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
804984.00no1928summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
805202.00no1929summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
806457.20no1930summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
807600.00no1934summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
808256.00no1932summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
80974.40no1934summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8101186.00no1936summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
811285.00no1940summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
812390.00no1941summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
813800.00no2002summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8141000.00no2004summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
815460.00no2006summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
816174.40no2007summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
817642.50no2008summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
818606.00no2009summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
819303.50no2010summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
820368.00no2016summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8211498.50no2204summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
822411.00no2230summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
823788.00no2257summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
824742.50no2262summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
825282.80no2265summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
826406.00no2268summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
827177.50no2281summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
828475.00no2510summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8291753.50no2517summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
830190.40no2605summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
831457.20no1930summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
832600.00no1934summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
833256.00no1932summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8341186.00no1936summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
835285.00no1940summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
836390.00no1941summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
837800.00no2002summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8381000.00no2004summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
839460.00no2006summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
840174.40no2007summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
841642.50no2008summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
842606.00no2009summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
843303.50no2010summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
844368.00no2016summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8451498.50no2204summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
846411.00no2230summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
847788.00no2257summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
848742.50no2262summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
849406.00no2268summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
850177.50no2281summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
851475.00no2510summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8521753.50no2517summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
853190.40no2605summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8541064.00no2701summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
855121.60no2702summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
856569.70no2802summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
857792.00no22103summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8581107.00no22106summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
859180.00no22113summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8607810.00no22114summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8616260.00no22115summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8621076.50no3001summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8633346.00no3002summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
86454.00no3004summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
865821.00no3005summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
86631576.00no3006summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8671266.20no4103summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
868400.00no5001summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8691642.00no5002summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8701281.00no5003summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
871710.00no5101summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8722186.00no5102summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
873585.00no5103summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
874482.50no5104summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8752365.00no5201summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
87667.40no5204summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8771566.50no5301summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
878223.50no5302summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
879151.50no5303summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8807311.00no5401summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8817297.00no5402summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
882210.00no5501summed from channel cross-sectionsOldrich Hungr, personal communication; see also Hungr et al. (2008)QCIQueen Charlotte Island, British Columbia, Canada
8834000.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingground survey and photographic documentationCondera et al. (2003)Riale Buffaga, Ticino, SwitzerlandAugust 28, 1997arson fire of March 15, 1997
88420900.00noheavy rain initiated mass failureAustin Runmean cross sectional area x eroded lengthCenderelli and Kite (1998)North Fork Mountain, Eastern West Virginia, USAJune 1949deposit volume listed as 15,000 m^3
8858500.00noheavy rain initiated mass failureKisamore Runmean cross sectional area x eroded lengthCenderelli and Kite (1998)North Fork Mountain, Eastern West Virginia, USAJune 1949deposit volume listed as 4,900 m^3
88613900.00noheavy rain initiated mass failureTwin Runmean cross sectional area x eroded lengthCenderelli and Kite (1998)North Fork Mountain, Eastern West Virginia, USANov 85deposit volume listed as 8,100 m^3
8873300.00noheavy rain initiated mass failureGravel Lick Runmean cross sectional area x eroded lengthCenderelli and Kite (1998)North Fork Mountain, Eastern West Virginia, USANov 85deposit volume listed as 2,700 m^3
88841000.00norapid snowmelt or prolonged rainfall produced concentration of overland flow1DFestimated based on post-event dGPS measurements and LiDAR imageryConway et al. (2010)WIIsafjorour, Westfjords of IcelandJune 2006deposit volume listed as 8,000 m^3, authors note that their methodology tended to overpredict erosion volume by 30-40%
88916000.00norapid snowmelt or prolonged rainfall caused rotational slide of glacial material2DFestimated based on post-event dGPS measurements and LiDAR imageryConway et al. (2010)WIIsafjorour, Westfjords of IcelandJune 1999deposit volume listed as 2,000 m^3, authors note that their methodology tended to overpredict erosion volume by 30-40%
8906000.00norapid snowmelt or prolonged rainfall caused rotational slide of glacial material3DFestimated based on post-event dGPS measurements and LiDAR imageryConway et al. (2010)WIIsafjorour, Westfjords of IcelandJune 1999deposit volume listed as 1,000 m^3, authors note that their methodology tended to overpredict erosion volume by 30-40%
891400.00norapid snowmelt or prolonged rainfall5DFestimated based on post-event dGPS measurements and LiDAR imageryConway et al. (2010)WIHnifsdalur, Westfjords of IcelandSpring 2007deposit volume listed as 100 m^3, authors note that their methodology tended to overpredict erosion volume by 30-40%
892600.00norapid snowmelt or prolonged rainfall7DFmeasured from pre- and post-event LiDAR imageryConway et al. (2010)WIIsafjorour, Westfjords of IcelandSpring 2008deposit volume listed as 500 m^3
893200.00norapid snowmelt or prolonged rainfall8DFmeasured from pre- and post-event LiDAR imageryConway et al. (2010)WISugandafjorour, Westfjords of IcelandSpring 2008deposit volume listed as 700 m^3
894500.00norapid snowmelt or prolonged rainfall10DFmeasured from pre- and post-event LiDAR imageryConway et al. (2010)WISugandafjorour, Westfjords of IcelandSpring 2008deposit volume listed as 800 m^3
89517148.85yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingAliso DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACChatsworth, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-22
896779.84yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingBig Briar DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-22
897807.36yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingBig Briar DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-01-27
8981685.83yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingBig Briar DB (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-12
899114.68yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingBig Briar DB (4th)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
90019603.82yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingBlanchard DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACTujunga, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-04
9014510.84yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingBlue Gum DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACTujunga, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9024197.37yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingCarter DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSG Valley, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-14
9032715.68yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingCloud Creek DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-04
9042293.65yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingCloud Creek DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
90515291.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingCooks DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
90615291.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingCooks M1-Amaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-19
90715153.38yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingCooks M1-Amaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-19
908535.18yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingDenivelle DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACTujunga, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
90915752.78yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingDunsmuir DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-07-10
91068809.50yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingDunsmuir DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9112515.36yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingEagle DB (1st)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-10-05
9124403.80yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingEagle DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-02
9132428.21yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingEagle DB (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-05
9143565.86yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingEagle DB (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-05
9156116.40yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingGoss Inletmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-11-27
9163711.12yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingGoss R&T Structurematerial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-02
9175477.23yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingGoss R&T Structure (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-10
9186370.99yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingGould DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-10-09
9196039.94yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingGould DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
92026074.21yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHalls DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-05
92189066.25yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHalls DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-11
922458.73yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHarter Lane DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-22
923917.46yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHarter Lane DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-01-23
9243970.30yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHarter Lane DB (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-13
925229.36yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHarter Lane DB (4th)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
92623876.89yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHay DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-23
9271376.19yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHay DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
92811468.25yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingHog DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSylmar, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9293440.47yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPD 1358 - La Salle DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSanta Clarita, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
93014000.43yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingMay DB #1material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSylmar, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-08
931993.91yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingMay DB #2material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSylmar, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
932535.18yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingMullally DB (1st)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-09-28
9337660.79yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingMullally DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-11-30
9341100.95yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingMullally DB (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-21
93532241.07yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingMullally DB (4th)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-19
9361951.13yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingMullally (5th)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-12
9371529.10yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPD 2049 - Mustang DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSanta Clarita, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9381614.72yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingOak DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-02
9392883.11yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingOak DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-25
94076.45yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPD 245 Inlets (1st)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-10-26
941137.61yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPD 245 Inlets (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
942552.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPD 245 Inlets & Line (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-04
943152.91yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPD 245 Inlets & Line (4th)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-26
94410815.32yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPickens DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-05
94591746.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPickens DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
946512.24yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPinelawn DB (1st)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-10-01
947290.52yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPinelawn DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-05
9481529.10yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPinelawn DB (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-01-27
9491720.23yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPinelawn DB (4th)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-02
950171.25yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingQuail East DRImaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-01-29
951405.97yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingQuail East DRI (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-24
95276.45yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingQuail East DRI (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
95361.16yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingQuail West DRImaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-01-29
954519.89yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingQuail West DRI (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-25
9553548.27yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRowley DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACTujunga, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-10-07
9561682.01yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingRowley DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACTujunga, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9571146.82yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPD 1920 - Royal DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSanta Clarita, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
958825.71yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingShields DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-09-30
9591682.01yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingShields DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
96012232.80yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSierra Madre Dammaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSan Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
96196.33yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSkyland Drive (Sierra Madre)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSan Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-02-06
962923.57yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSkyridge DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-04
96320642.85yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSombrero DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSylmar, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9647504.82yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSnover DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-05
9654977.22yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSnover DB (HESCO Wall)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-19
9661834.92yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSnover DB(2)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9671009.20yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingStarfall DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-05
9685180.59yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingStarfall DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-05
9696074.34yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingStarfall DB (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-19
9706116.40yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingStetson DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSylmar, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9712188.14yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingStonehouse R&Tmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSan Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-12
972344.04yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingSturtevant DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSan Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-15
9738071.35yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingUpper Gould DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-02
97427971.06yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingUpper Gould DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-11
975708.73yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingUpper Rowley DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACTujunga, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-19
9769296.16yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingUpper Rowley DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACTujunga, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-03-16
97712997.35yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingUpper Shieldsmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Crescenta, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
97884100.50yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingVerdugo DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
97910981.99yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWard DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACGlendale, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-19
98030582.00yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWilson DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSylmar, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9813640.02yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWinery DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2009-12-05
98220078.61yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWinery DB (2nd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-22
9831146.82yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingWinery DB (3rd)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACLa Canada Flintridge, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
9842675.92yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingPD 2157 - Yucca DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSanta Clarita, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009
985183.49yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingYucca Trail R&Tmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSan Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-01-20
986385.33yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingYucca Trail R&T (2)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSan Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-09
98776.45yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingYucca Trail R&T (3)material removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACSan Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-02-10
98811209.83yesrunoff-initiated/progressive bulkingZachau DBmaterial removed during cleanupSue Cannon, personal communication, from data provided by Los Angeles County, California, USALACTujunga, Los Angeles County, California, USAAutumn 2009 or Winter 2010Station Fire, August-October 2009date cleanup complete: 2010-01-11