<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><resource xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.3/metadata.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4"><identifier identifierType="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.771145</identifier><creators><creator><creatorName>Abdullateef, Raji Akintunde</creatorName><givenName>Raji Akintunde</givenName><familyName>Abdullateef</familyName></creator></creators><titles><title>Different treatments on effects of light, dark and hormone factors on rooting in Stem cuttings of stevia rebaudiana</title></titles><publisher>PANGAEA</publisher><publicationYear>2011</publicationYear><subjects><subject subjectScheme="Parameter">Number</subject><subject subjectScheme="Parameter">Number of cuttings</subject><subject subjectScheme="Parameter">Day of first emergent</subject><subject subjectScheme="Parameter">Percentage of rooted cuttings</subject><subject subjectScheme="Parameter">Number of roots, average</subject><subject subjectScheme="Parameter">Length of roots, average</subject><subject subjectScheme="Parameter">Width of roots, average</subject><subject subjectScheme="Parameter">Treatment</subject></subjects><resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType><relatedIdentifiers><relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsPartOf">10.1594/PANGAEA.771152</relatedIdentifier><relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="References">10.5539/ijb.v3n4p83</relatedIdentifier></relatedIdentifiers><sizes><size>48 data points</size></sizes><formats><format>text/tab-separated-values</format></formats><rightsList><rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" schemeURI="https://spdx.org/licenses/" rightsIdentifierScheme="SPDX" rightsIdentifier="CC-BY-4.0">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights></rightsList><descriptions><description descriptionType="TechnicalInfo">This dataset has been carefully reviewed and curated in accordance with PANGAEA's exceptionally high quality standards. However, due to discontinued communication from the authors' side, it did not receive the usual formal approval by the authors and therefore lacks final scientific validation.</description></descriptions></resource>