Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Mallik, Tapas Kumar (1978): Ages, lithologie descriptions and mineral analyses from different DSDP holes in the Indian Ocean [dataset publication series]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.764073, Supplement to: Mallik, TK (1978): Mineralogy of deep-sea sands of the Indian Ocean. Marine Geology, 27(1-2), 161-176, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(78)90078-6

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
The present work is based on mineralogical studies of sand and silt layers from a number of Deep Sea Drilling Project sites in the Indian Ocean belonging to different physiographic provinces of different ages. The minerals can be grouped into two major associations: a hornblende-opaque association with varying amounts of pyroxene, garnet, epidote, zircon, etc. and a biotite-chlorite-muscovite assemblage. The dominance of unstable minerals indicates a first generation, though evidence of reworking is reflected in the zircon and tourmaline grains at some sites. A large variety of minerals at some sites indicates a complex source. The mineral composition is nearly homogeneous at different sites for the entire length of the core, indicating that they have been derived from the same source during the deposition of that interval. However, the provenance changed by tectonic activity, the effect of which has been reflected in the mineralogy of some sites. An attempt was made to describe the mineralogic characteristics and their tectonic interpretations in the Pliocene and Miocene periods in the Ganges and Indus fan sites and also in the Wharton and Mozambique basin sites. Similar attempts could not be made for other ages in other physiographic provinces as the numbers of samples were too few. Within the limited scope, some idea about the mineralogical character of different basins and different physiographic provinces can be obtained from the present study. Mineralogical evidence also suggests very long transport of sediments in the deep sea. Regional variation of mineralogy has resulted due to source, sea-floor configuration, selective removal, reworking by different agencies and the processes operating in the ocean. There is no relation between a particular age and a set mineral assemblage for the Cenozoic sediments of the Indian Ocean.
Project(s):
Coverage:
Median Latitude: -11.043179 * Median Longitude: 60.951918 * South-bound Latitude: -33.462300 * West-bound Longitude: 37.474700 * North-bound Latitude: 20.091500 * East-bound Longitude: 102.699200
Date/Time Start: 1972-01-21T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1972-09-08T00:00:00
Event(s):
22-211 * Latitude: -9.775500 * Longitude: 102.699200 * Date/Time: 1972-01-21T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5518.0 m * Penetration: 447 m * Recovery: 66.2 m * Location: Indian Ocean//BASIN * Campaign: Leg22 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 14 cores; 131.5 m cored; 8.5 m drilled; 50.3 % recovery
22-214 * Latitude: -11.336800 * Longitude: 88.718000 * Date/Time: 1972-02-08T00:00:00 * Elevation: -1655.0 m * Penetration: 500 m * Recovery: 340.9 m * Location: Indian Ocean//RIDGE * Campaign: Leg22 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 53 cores; 492.5 m cored; 2.5 m drilled; 69.2 % recovery
22-218 * Latitude: 8.007000 * Longitude: 86.282800 * Date/Time: 1972-03-01T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3749.0 m * Penetration: 773 m * Recovery: 59 m * Location: Indian Ocean//FAN * Campaign: Leg22 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 27 cores; 251 m cored; 0 m drilled; 23.5 % recovery
Size:
4 datasets

Download Data

Download ZIP file containing all datasets as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding: