Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Sukhanova, Irina N; Flint, Mikhail V; Whitledge, Terry E; Lessard, Evelyn J (2004): Coccoliths in phytoplankton of the Eastern Bering Sea in August 2001 [dataset publication series]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.762784, Supplement to: Sukhanova, IN et al. (2004): Coccolithophorids in the phytoplankton of the Eastern Bering Sea after anomalous bloom of 1997. Translated from Okeanologiya, 2004, 44(5), 709-722, Oceanology, 44(5), 665-678

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
Based on results of field observations in August 1998, July 2000, and August 2001 composition and quantitative distribution of coccolithophorids in the middle part of the Eastern Bering Sea shelf between 56°052'N and 59°019'N was characterized. Emiliania huxleyi abundance, biomass, and population structure as well as role of species in the coccolithophorid community and phytoplankton as a whole were evaluated. Abundance of the species in the upper mixed layer in bloom areas was 1-3 mln cells/l and biomass made up 30-75 mg C/m**3. E. huxleyi share in total phytoplankton numbers and biomass at that reached 98% and 84% respectively. Significant spatial heterogeneity of E. huxleyi, quantitative distribution and population size structure, as well as asynchronism in population development in neighboring parts of the bloom area were shown. The time period, during which population structure in certain part of the area shifts from domination of juvenile cells without coccoliths to a phase of active detritus formation with dying coccolithophorid cells involved, may be estimated as two weeks. A conclusion is made that after anomalous E. huxleyi bloom in 1997 mass development of coccolithophorids became a characteristic feature of phytoplankton community's seasonal succession in the middle part of the Eastern Bering Sea shelf.
Project(s):
Archive of Ocean Data (ARCOD)
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 57.742112 * Median Longitude: -167.703684 * South-bound Latitude: 56.850000 * West-bound Longitude: -170.130000 * North-bound Latitude: 58.830000 * East-bound Longitude: -164.020000
Event(s):
AH-2001-B1/M2 * Latitude: 56.850000 * Longitude: -164.020000 * Location: East Bering Sea * Method/Device: Bottle, Niskin (NIS)
AH-2001-B2 * Latitude: 57.130000 * Longitude: -165.110000 * Location: East Bering Sea * Method/Device: Bottle, Niskin (NIS)
AH-2001-B3 * Latitude: 57.330000 * Longitude: -166.150000 * Location: East Bering Sea * Method/Device: Bottle, Niskin (NIS)
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
7 datasets

Download Data

Download ZIP file containing all datasets as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

Datasets listed in this publication series

  1. Sukhanova, IN; Flint, MV; Whitledge, TE et al. (2004): (Table 2) Quantitative parameters of the Emiliania huxleyi population at the section along 70 m isobath carried out on 26 and 27 August 2001. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.762770
  2. Sukhanova, IN; Flint, MV; Whitledge, TE et al. (2004): (Table 3) Quantitative parameters of the Emiliania huxleyi population along the section from the Pribilofs Islands to the Nunivak Island carried out on 24 and 25 August 2001. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.762771
  3. Whitledge, TE; Lessard, EJ (2004): (Table 4a) Biomass of Emiliania huxleyi and its role in total biomass of phytoplankton at the section along 70 m isobath on 26-27 August 2001. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.762768
  4. Sukhanova, IN; Flint, MV; Whitledge, TE et al. (2004): (Table 4b) Biomass of Emiliania huxleyi and its role in total biomass of phytoplankton along the section from the Pribilofs Islands to the Nunivak Island on 24-25 August 2001. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.762769
  5. Sukhanova, IN; Flint, MV; Whitledge, TE et al. (2004): (Table 5) Temporal variations of relative abundance of dead cells (in detritus and conglomerates) of total number of living and dead cells of Emiliania huxleyi at Station AH-2001-B6/M4. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.762779
  6. Sukhanova, IN; Flint, MV; Whitledge, TE et al. (2004): (Table 6) Temporal variations of relative abundance of dead cells (in detritus, conglomerates and associated with Probocsia alata) of total number of living and dead cells of Emiliania huxleyi at Stations AH-2001-B3 and AH-2001-B3A. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.762780
  7. Sukhanova, IN; Flint, MV; Whitledge, TE et al. (2004): (Table 7) Abundance of different Emiliania huxleyi cells in 0-25 m layer (upper mixed and thermocline layers) and in >25 m layer (under the thermocline) at Stations AH-2001-B3 and AH-2001-B3A. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.762783