Nees, Stefan; Thiede, Jörn (1993): (Appendix 3) Stable isotope record of Neogloboquadrina pachyderma of sediment core PS1906-2 in the Greenland Sea [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.66896, In supplement to: Nees, Stefan (1993): Spätquartäre Benthosforaminiferen des Europäischen Nordmeeres: Veränderungen der Artengesellschaften und Akkumulationsraten bei Klimawechseln. Berichte aus dem Sonderforschungsbereich 313, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, 44, 80 pp, https://doi.org/10.2312/reports-sfb313.1993.44
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
Project(s):
Coverage:
Latitude: 76.846300 * Longitude: -2.150500
Date/Time Start: 1990-07-04T09:29:00 * Date/Time End: 1990-07-04T09:29:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.005 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 3.155 m
Event(s):
PS1906-2 (GIK21906-2 PS17/081) * Latitude: 76.846300 * Longitude: -2.150500 * Date/Time: 1990-07-04T09:29:00 * Elevation: -2901.0 m * Penetration: 6.8 m * Recovery: 6.52 m * Location: Greenland Sea * Campaign: ARK-VII/1 (PS17) * Basis: Polarstern * Method/Device: Kasten corer (KAL)
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 2 | AGE | Age | ka BP | Geocode | ||
| 3 | Sedimentation rate | SR | cm/ka | Thiede, Jörn | Calculated | |
| 4 | Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sinistral, δ18O | N. pachyderma s δ18O | ‰ PDB | Thiede, Jörn | Mass spectrometer Finnigan MAT 251 | |
| 5 | Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sinistral, δ13C | N. pachyderma s δ13C | ‰ PDB | Thiede, Jörn | Mass spectrometer Finnigan MAT 251 | |
| 6 | Stage | Stage | Thiede, Jörn | time slice | ||
| 7 | Reference/source | Reference | Thiede, Jörn | stable isotope data | ||
| 8 | Age, comment | Comm | Thiede, Jörn | Age interpretation after |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
529 data points
Data
| 1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Age [ka BP] | 3 SR [cm/ka] | 4 N. pachyderma s δ18O [‰ PDB] | 5 N. pachyderma s δ13C [‰ PDB] | 6 Stage | 7 Reference | 8 Comm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.005 | 0.700 | 0.71 | 3.69 | 0.87 | Hamich (1991) | extrapolation | |
| 0.020 | 2.800 | 0.71 | 3.54 | 0.79 | this study | extrapolation | |
| 0.040 | 5.600 | 0.71 | 3.51 | 0.80 | this study | extrapolation | |
| 0.055 | 7.700 | 5.00 | 3.26 | 0.94 | Hamich (1991) | this study | |
| 0.070 | 8.000 | 5.00 | 3.68 | 0.87 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.105 | 8.700 | 5.00 | 3.45 | 0.65 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.120 | 9.000 | 5.00 | 3.62 | 0.70 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.140 | 9.400 | 5.00 | 3.93 | 0.61 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.155 | 9.700 | 3.15 | 3.37 | 0.42 | 1.1 | Hamich (1991) | Vogelsang (1990) |
| 0.170 | 10.176 | 3.15 | 3.71 | 0.33 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.190 | 10.812 | 3.15 | 3.87 | 0.55 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.205 | 11.288 | 3.15 | 3.70 | 0.38 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.220 | 11.765 | 3.15 | 3.46 | 0.00 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.240 | 12.400 | 0.86 | 4.43 | 0.32 | Younger Dryas | this study | this study |
| 0.255 | 14.140 | 0.86 | 3.62 | 0.13 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.270 | 15.880 | 0.86 | 3.80 | 0.07 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.290 | 18.200 | 2.80 | 4.55 | 0.21 | 2.22 | this study | Vogelsang (1990) |
| 0.305 | 18.737 | 2.80 | 4.38 | 0.20 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.320 | 19.273 | 2.80 | 3.57 | 0.17 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.340 | 19.989 | 2.80 | 4.31 | 0.04 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.360 | 20.704 | 2.80 | 3.98 | 0.03 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.380 | 21.420 | 2.80 | 3.90 | 0.00 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.405 | 22.314 | 1.99 | 4.56 | 0.25 | 2.2 | Hamich (1991) | Hamich (1991) |
| 0.420 | 23.067 | 1.99 | 4.47 | 0.03 | this study | interpolation | |
| 0.455 | 24.823 | 1.99 | 4.09 | 0.03 | Hamich (1991) | this study | |
| 0.505 | 27.333 | 2.31 | 4.33 | 0.17 | -2.4 | Hamich (1991) | Martinson et al. (1987) |
| 0.555 | 29.500 | 23.33 | 3.69 | 0.12 | 3.1 | Hamich (1991) | Sarnthein, pers com. |
| 0.605 | 29.714 | 23.33 | 3.91 | -0.06 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.655 | 29.929 | 23.33 | 3.84 | 0.14 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.705 | 30.143 | 23.33 | 4.06 | 0.13 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.755 | 30.357 | 23.33 | 3.84 | 0.15 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.805 | 30.571 | 23.33 | 3.89 | 0.20 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.855 | 30.786 | 23.33 | 3.84 | 0.21 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 0.905 | 31.000 | 1.16 | 3.56 | 0.03 | Hamich (1991) | this study | |
| 0.955 | 35.293 | 1.16 | 4.05 | 0.15 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.005 | 39.587 | 1.16 | 3.81 | 0.13 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.055 | 43.880 | 6.08 | 3.30 | 0.13 | 3.13 | Hamich (1991) | this study |
| 1.105 | 44.702 | 6.08 | 3.63 | 0.31 | End calendar year | Hamich (1991) | interpolation |
| 1.155 | 45.524 | 6.08 | 3.39 | 0.28 | End calendar year | Hamich (1991) | interpolation |
| 1.205 | 46.346 | 6.08 | 3.52 | 0.27 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.225 | 46.675 | 6.08 | 3.75 | 0.38 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.255 | 47.168 | 6.08 | 3.79 | 0.22 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.305 | 47.990 | 6.08 | 3.87 | 0.31 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.355 | 48.812 | 6.08 | 3.57 | 0.35 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.370 | 49.059 | 6.08 | 3.80 | 0.31 | this study | interpolation | |
| 1.390 | 49.388 | 6.08 | 3.45 | 0.20 | this study | interpolation | |
| 1.405 | 49.635 | 6.08 | 3.81 | 0.39 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.420 | 49.881 | 6.08 | 4.18 | 0.27 | this study | interpolation | |
| 1.440 | 50.210 | 3.15 | 3.30 | -0.13 | 3.3 | this study | Martinson et al. (1987) |
| 1.455 | 50.686 | 3.15 | 3.88 | 0.22 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.470 | 51.163 | 3.15 | 3.92 | 0.14 | this study | interpolation | |
| 1.490 | 51.798 | 3.15 | 4.13 | -0.06 | this study | interpolation | |
| 1.505 | 52.274 | 3.15 | 3.85 | 0.13 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.520 | 52.751 | 3.15 | 3.85 | 0.04 | this study | interpolation | |
| 1.540 | 53.386 | 3.15 | 4.14 | 0.18 | this study | interpolation | |
| 1.555 | 53.862 | 3.15 | 3.43 | 0.20 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.585 | 54.815 | 3.15 | 3.47 | -0.01 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.605 | 55.450 | 1.02 | 3.38 | -0.07 | 3.33 | Hamich (1991) | this study |
| 1.655 | 60.335 | 1.02 | 3.73 | 0.12 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.685 | 63.266 | 1.02 | 3.88 | 0.02 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.705 | 65.220 | 2.69 | 3.98 | 0.28 | 4.22 | Hamich (1991) | Vogelsang (1990) |
| 1.755 | 67.080 | 2.69 | 3.44 | 0.54 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.805 | 68.940 | 2.69 | 4.00 | 0.55 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 1.855 | 70.800 | 0.58 | 4.05 | 0.30 | 4.24 | Hamich (1991) | Vogelsang (1990) |
| 1.905 | 79.455 | 0.32 | 3.63 | 0.48 | 5.1 | Hamich (1991) | Vogelsang (1990) |
| 1.955 | 95.123 | 0.32 | 3.75 | 0.79 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.005 | 110.790 | 1.73 | 3.83 | 0.73 | 5.4 | Hamich (1991) | Hamich (1991) |
| 2.055 | 113.686 | 1.73 | 3.77 | 0.78 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.105 | 116.583 | 1.73 | 3.67 | 0.61 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.155 | 119.479 | 1.73 | 3.46 | 0.58 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.190 | 121.506 | 1.73 | 3.48 | 0.56 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.205 | 122.375 | 5.71 | 3.17 | 0.40 | 5.51 | Hamich (1991) | Hamich (1991) |
| 2.220 | 122.638 | 5.71 | 3.44 | 0.48 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.240 | 122.988 | 5.71 | 3.40 | 0.43 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.255 | 123.250 | 5.71 | 4.05 | 0.21 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.270 | 123.513 | 5.71 | 3.86 | 0.18 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.290 | 123.863 | 5.71 | 4.07 | -0.02 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.305 | 124.125 | 5.71 | 4.01 | -0.09 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.325 | 124.475 | 5.71 | 4.07 | -0.01 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.340 | 124.738 | 5.71 | 4.89 | 0.33 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.355 | 125.000 | 1.01 | 3.09 | -0.30 | 5.53 | Hamich (1991) | Hamich (1991) |
| 2.390 | 128.464 | 1.01 | 3.78 | 0.11 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.405 | 129.948 | 1.01 | 3.68 | -0.62 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.420 | 131.433 | 1.01 | 3.78 | -0.02 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.440 | 133.412 | 1.01 | 3.34 | 0.14 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.460 | 135.392 | 1.01 | 3.81 | 0.28 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.480 | 137.371 | 1.01 | 3.99 | 0.16 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.505 | 139.845 | 1.01 | 3.87 | 0.02 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.570 | 155.623 | 0.35 | 4.02 | -0.02 | this study | interpolation | |
| 2.590 | 161.340 | 1.15 | 4.13 | -0.13 | 6.4 | this study | Martinson et al. (1987) |
| 2.605 | 162.648 | 1.15 | 4.24 | 0.07 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.655 | 167.009 | 1.15 | 4.03 | 0.09 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.705 | 171.370 | 2.07 | 3.82 | -0.06 | 6.5 | Hamich (1991) | Vogelsang (1990) |
| 2.775 | 174.746 | 2.07 | 4.21 | 0.03 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.805 | 176.192 | 2.07 | 4.15 | 0.14 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.905 | 181.014 | 2.07 | 3.92 | 0.19 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.935 | 182.461 | 2.07 | 4.01 | 0.62 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 2.955 | 183.426 | 2.07 | 3.57 | 0.57 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 3.005 | 185.837 | 2.07 | 3.64 | 0.56 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 3.055 | 188.248 | 2.07 | 3.57 | 0.57 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 3.105 | 190.659 | 2.07 | 3.51 | 0.59 | Hamich (1991) | interpolation | |
| 3.155 | 193.070 | 3.36 | 0.52 | 7.1 | Hamich (1991) | Hamich (1991) |