Rühlemann, Carsten (2006): Compilation of temperature and UK`37 alkenone unsaturation index from filter samples [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.547958
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
Bac, Margaret G; Buck, Kurt R; Chavez, Francisco P; Brassell, Simon C (2003): Seasonal variation in alkenones, bulk suspended POM, plankton and temperature in Monterey Bay, California: Implications for carbon cycling and climate assessment. Organic Geochemistry, 34, 837-855, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00248-6
Bendle, James A; Rosell-Melé, Antoni (2004): Distributions of UK37 and UK'37 in the surface waters and sediments of the Nordic Seas: Implications for paleoceanography. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 5, Q11013, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000741
Bentaleb, Ilhem; Grimalt, Joan O; Vidussi, Francesca; Marty, Jean-Claude; Martin, Valérie; Denis, Michel; Hatté, C; Fontugne, Michel R (1999): The C37 alkenone record of seawater temperature during seasonal thermocline stratification. Marine Chemistry, 64(4), 301-313, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(98)00079-6
Cacho, Isabel; Pelejero, Carles; Grimalt, Joan O; Calafat, Antonio M; Canals, Miquel (1999): C37 alkenone measurements of sea surface temperature in the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). Organic Geochemistry, 30(7), 557-566, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(99)00038-8
Conte, Maureen H; Eglinton, Geoffrey (1993): Alkenone and alkenoate distributions within the euphotic zone of the eastern North Atlantic: correlation with production temperature. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 40(10), 1935-1961, https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(93)90040-A
Conte, Maureen H; Thompson, Anu; Eglinton, Geoffrey (1994): Primary production of lipid biomarker compounds by Emiliania huxleyi: Results from an experimental mesocosm study in Korsfjorden, southern Norway. Sarsia, 79, 319-332
Harada, Naomi; Shin, Kyung-Hoon; Murata, Akihiko; Uchida, Masao; Nakatani, Tomoko (2003): Characteristics of alkenones synthesized by a bloom of Emiliania huxleyi in the Bering Sea. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 67, 1507-1519, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01318-2
Prahl, Frederick G; Popp, B N; Karl, David Michael; Sparrow, Margaret A (2005): Ecology and biogeochemistry of alkenone production at Station ALOHA. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 52(5), 699-719, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.12.001
Rühlemann, Carsten; Butzin, Martin (2006): Alkenone temperature anomalies in the Brazil-Malvinas Confluence area caused by lateral advection of suspended particulate material. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 7, Q10015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001251
Sawada, Ken; Handa, Nobuhiko; Nakatsuda, T (1998): Production and transport of long-chain alkenone and alkyl alkenoates in a sea water column in the northwestern Pacific off central Japan. Marine Chemistry, 59(3-4), 219-234, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(97)00074-1
Shin, Kyung-Hoon; Tanaka, N; Marty, Jean-Claude (2002): Production and turnover rates of C37 alkenones in the eastern Bering Sea: implication for the mechanism of a long duration of Emiliani huxleyi bloom. Progress in Oceanography, 55, 113-129, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(02)00073-3
Sikes, Elisabeth L; Volkman, J K (1993): Calibration of alkenones unsaturation ratios (Uk37) for paleotemperature estimation in cold polar waters. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 57(8), 1883-1889, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(93)90120-L
Project(s):
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 6.273373 * Median Longitude: -9.129737 * South-bound Latitude: -61.780000 * West-bound Longitude: -168.980000 * North-bound Latitude: 80.420000 * East-bound Longitude: 178.170000
Minimum DEPTH, water: 1 m * Maximum DEPTH, water: 10 m
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LATITUDE | Latitude | Geocode | |||
| 2 | LONGITUDE | Longitude | Geocode | |||
| 3 | DEPTH, water | Depth water | m | Geocode | ||
| 4 | Temperature, water | Temp | °C | Rühlemann, Carsten | Thermosalinograph (TSG) | |
| 5 | Alkenone, unsaturation index UK'37 | UK'37 | Rühlemann, Carsten | Calculated, see reference(s) | ||
| 6 | Sampling date | Sampling date | Rühlemann, Carsten | Sampling date | ||
| 7 | Reference/source | Reference | Rühlemann, Carsten | |||
| 8 | Comment | Comment | Rühlemann, Carsten |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
1681 data points
Data
| 1 Latitude | 2 Longitude | 3 Depth water [m] | 4 Temp [°C] | 5 UK'37 | 6 Sampling date | 7 Reference | 8 Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -61.78 | 138.10 | 3 | -0.7 | 0.104 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -59.63 | 139.17 | 3 | -0.2 | 0.032 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -58.13 | 139.83 | 3 | 1.5 | 0.038 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -55.90 | 140.85 | 3 | 1.2 | 0.032 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -54.12 | 141.67 | 3 | 1.8 | 0.039 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -54.12 | 141.67 | 3 | 1.8 | 0.130 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -53.85 | 140.67 | 3 | 3.2 | 0.070 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -53.53 | 141.98 | 3 | 1.4 | 0.053 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -53.13 | 142.25 | 3 | 2.5 | 0.039 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -51.85 | 142.58 | 3 | 3.9 | 0.050 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -51.45 | 142.58 | 3 | 4.3 | 0.064 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -51.25 | 142.90 | 3 | 7.0 | 0.126 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -50.67 | 143.25 | 3 | 5.6 | 0.057 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -50.22 | 143.18 | 3 | 7.4 | 0.075 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -48.60 | 20.73 | 8 | 3.9 | 0.026 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -48.34 | 21.02 | 8 | 3.8 | 0.057 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -48.28 | 21.12 | 8 | 3.7 | 0.032 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -48.21 | 20.70 | 8 | 4.1 | 0.028 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -48.17 | 20.83 | 8 | 3.5 | 0.035 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -48.12 | 21.12 | 8 | 3.9 | 0.074 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -48.10 | 20.88 | 8 | 3.7 | 0.064 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -48.00 | 20.94 | 8 | 3.9 | 0.030 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -48.00 | 21.01 | 8 | 3.9 | 0.077 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -48.00 | 144.37 | 3 | 8.8 | 0.292 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -47.99 | 20.83 | 8 | 3.9 | 0.051 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -47.99 | 20.90 | 8 | 3.7 | 0.040 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -47.98 | 21.08 | 8 | 3.8 | 0.072 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -47.88 | 20.95 | 8 | 3.6 | 0.051 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -47.82 | 20.75 | 8 | 3.6 | 0.026 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -47.71 | 21.06 | 8 | 3.8 | 0.059 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -47.67 | 20.65 | 8 | 3.9 | 0.067 | Nov-2001 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| -46.45 | 145.08 | 3 | 9.5 | 0.237 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -46.42 | 145.08 | 3 | 9.5 | 0.334 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -46.22 | -48.93 | 5 | 13.7 | 0.410 | 16-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -46.15 | -57.56 | 5 | 15.9 | 0.406 | 29-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -46.05 | -58.94 | 5 | 11.7 | 0.281 | 30-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -45.58 | -48.26 | 5 | 15.7 | 0.419 | 18-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -45.56 | -49.44 | 5 | 14.8 | 0.446 | 17-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -45.27 | -48.26 | 5 | 15.8 | 0.429 | 15-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -45.20 | -59.09 | 5 | 12.3 | 0.294 | 1-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -45.18 | 145.70 | 3 | 9.5 | 0.226 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -45.18 | 145.73 | 3 | 9.5 | 0.225 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -44.90 | -54.45 | 5 | 14.5 | 0.365 | 28-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.70 | 145.93 | 3 | 9.8 | 0.211 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -44.51 | -57.82 | 5 | 13.2 | 0.272 | 20-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.48 | -57.31 | 5 | 16.9 | 0.393 | 2-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.38 | -50.17 | 5 | 19.8 | 0.620 | 21-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.34 | -57.87 | 5 | 15.9 | 0.453 | 4-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.32 | -57.50 | 5 | 15.8 | 0.415 | 3-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.25 | -57.75 | 5 | 13.6 | 0.274 | 16-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.23 | -50.93 | 5 | 18.7 | 0.555 | 27-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.10 | 146.25 | 3 | 11.3 | 0.294 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -44.10 | 146.25 | 3 | 11.3 | 0.323 | Oct-1991 | Sikes and Volkman (1993) | |
| -44.08 | -48.21 | 5 | 16.9 | 0.455 | 14-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.05 | -48.68 | 5 | 16.5 | 0.445 | 12-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -44.01 | -49.94 | 5 | 19.7 | 0.590 | 20-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.99 | -58.12 | 5 | 13.4 | 0.268 | 18-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.95 | -58.60 | 5 | 13.5 | 0.282 | 17-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.95 | -48.95 | 5 | 17.6 | 0.472 | 26-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.83 | -49.98 | 5 | 19.4 | 0.608 | 22-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.80 | -50.36 | 5 | 18.8 | 0.581 | 25-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.74 | -58.99 | 5 | 13.5 | 0.312 | 4-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.68 | -49.68 | 5 | 16.1 | 0.438 | 24-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.66 | -48.46 | 5 | 16.9 | 0.502 | 12-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.59 | -50.33 | 5 | 19.6 | 0.647 | 23-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.51 | -58.14 | 5 | 13.3 | 0.274 | 21-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.49 | -48.13 | 5 | 17.6 | 0.563 | 13-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.39 | -59.36 | 5 | 13.7 | 0.275 | 15-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -43.10 | -59.84 | 5 | 15.3 | 0.317 | 15-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -42.84 | -49.65 | 5 | 18.5 | 0.593 | 11-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -42.63 | -59.63 | 5 | 15.6 | 0.311 | 15-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -42.63 | -50.48 | 5 | 17.9 | 0.594 | 11-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -42.34 | -57.44 | 5 | 12.6 | 0.311 | 22-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -42.30 | -60.27 | 5 | 19.2 | 0.581 | 5-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -42.08 | -52.70 | 5 | 19.6 | 0.649 | 10-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -42.01 | 175.41 | 7 | 13.3 | 0.507 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -41.85 | -53.20 | 5 | 19.9 | 0.667 | 10-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -41.03 | -57.53 | 5 | 19.5 | 0.532 | 6-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -40.97 | -56.04 | 5 | 11.8 | 0.279 | 26-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -40.71 | -56.42 | 5 | 12.8 | 0.277 | 25-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -40.51 | -55.55 | 5 | 14.0 | 0.293 | 23-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -40.49 | -56.01 | 5 | 13.0 | 0.256 | 24-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -40.38 | 177.99 | 7 | 15.9 | 0.439 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -40.00 | -57.71 | 5 | 17.4 | 0.426 | 14-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -39.42 | -57.34 | 5 | 18.2 | 0.397 | 14-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -39.41 | -55.82 | 5 | 20.5 | 0.640 | 8-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -39.00 | -57.08 | 5 | 18.3 | 0.573 | 14-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -38.81 | 178.17 | 7 | 16.1 | 0.523 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -38.79 | -54.57 | 5 | 15.3 | 0.344 | 27-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -38.70 | -53.76 | 5 | 19.1 | 0.565 | 28-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -38.68 | -54.82 | 5 | 21.2 | 0.743 | 5-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -38.66 | -53.92 | 5 | 17.9 | 0.503 | 28-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -38.56 | -53.69 | 5 | 20.7 | 0.682 | 28-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -38.40 | -54.56 | 5 | 17.9 | 0.462 | 28-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -38.40 | -54.56 | 5 | 19.4 | 0.568 | 3-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -38.17 | -54.35 | 5 | 18.7 | 0.483 | 28-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -38.13 | -55.23 | 5 | 17.0 | 0.414 | 28-Feb-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -37.60 | -53.49 | 5 | 23.4 | 0.818 | 2-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -37.39 | -53.71 | 5 | 23.3 | 0.816 | 1-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -36.96 | 177.40 | 7 | 17.6 | 0.543 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -36.47 | -52.57 | 5 | 22.4 | 0.801 | 4-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -36.18 | -52.17 | 5 | 24.6 | 0.865 | 5-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -35.55 | 175.02 | 7 | 17.8 | 0.558 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -34.08 | -53.42 | 5 | 23.5 | 0.859 | 10-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -34.05 | 171.40 | 7 | 18.3 | 0.599 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -33.95 | -47.90 | 5 | 25.4 | 0.833 | 14-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -33.16 | -48.55 | 5 | 26.9 | 0.944 | 15-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -33.14 | -52.16 | 5 | 26.4 | 0.924 | 10-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -33.08 | -52.86 | 5 | 25.4 | 0.891 | 10-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -33.08 | -47.41 | 5 | 25.9 | 0.938 | 12-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -33.06 | -47.65 | 5 | 24.6 | 0.863 | 12-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -33.05 | 168.36 | 7 | 18.4 | 0.625 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -32.58 | -49.15 | 5 | 26.8 | 0.966 | 16-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -32.12 | -49.45 | 5 | 26.8 | 0.965 | 11-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -32.10 | -49.50 | 5 | 26.9 | 0.978 | 15-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -32.06 | -50.37 | 5 | 27.0 | 0.976 | 11-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -32.02 | 165.47 | 7 | 19.6 | 0.655 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -31.08 | -48.61 | 5 | 26.6 | 0.965 | 13-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -31.07 | -49.00 | 5 | 25.9 | 0.873 | 14-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -30.48 | 164.57 | 7 | 21.2 | 0.756 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -30.06 | -48.51 | 5 | 27.0 | 0.981 | 18-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -29.06 | -43.50 | 5 | 27.5 | 0.920 | 19-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -27.22 | 164.25 | 7 | 20.7 | 0.747 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -27.11 | -42.42 | 5 | 28.1 | 0.951 | 28-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -27.06 | -41.89 | 5 | 27.9 | 0.896 | 20-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -27.02 | 3.83 | 4 | 22.4 | 0.780 | 19-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -26.77 | 13.35 | 5 | 21.7 | 0.791 | 1-Mar-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -26.76 | 163.63 | 7 | 21.9 | 0.764 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -26.65 | 6.01 | 4 | 22.1 | 0.786 | 18-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -26.48 | 7.23 | 4 | 22.4 | 0.806 | 18-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -26.30 | 13.64 | 5 | 20.3 | 0.775 | 28-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -26.07 | -43.56 | 5 | 28.3 | 0.952 | 21-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -26.07 | -43.45 | 5 | 28.3 | 0.944 | 26-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -26.01 | -43.55 | 5 | 28.8 | 0.944 | 25-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.76 | 11.60 | 4 | 21.6 | 0.754 | 17-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.55 | 12.91 | 5 | 19.7 | 0.722 | 2-Mar-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.53 | 12.94 | 5 | 20.5 | 0.795 | 27-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.51 | 13.19 | 5 | 16.7 | 0.497 | 5-Mar-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.48 | 13.55 | 5 | 17.2 | 0.571 | 25-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.47 | 13.50 | 5 | 18.4 | 0.595 | 23-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.45 | 13.64 | 5 | 17.1 | 0.549 | 24-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.38 | 13.52 | 5 | 17.5 | 0.487 | 6-Mar-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.38 | 13.87 | 5 | 16.1 | 0.551 | 20-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -25.08 | -44.67 | 5 | 27.6 | 0.985 | 22-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.87 | 11.91 | 5 | 20.7 | 0.766 | 26-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.83 | 12.92 | 4 | 18.6 | 0.605 | 16-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.77 | 13.00 | 5 | 18.4 | 0.638 | 19-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.46 | 12.71 | 5 | 20.1 | 0.750 | 18-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.40 | 13.03 | 5 | 19.0 | 0.631 | 17-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.36 | 13.14 | 5 | 17.9 | 0.582 | 15-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.25 | 13.59 | 5 | 17.3 | 0.567 | 16-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.23 | 13.68 | 5 | 17.4 | 0.564 | 12-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.20 | 12.91 | 5 | 18.6 | 0.676 | 8-Mar-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.17 | 12.80 | 4 | 17.9 | 0.602 | 16-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.04 | -40.66 | 5 | 28.2 | 0.963 | 29-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -24.02 | -44.52 | 5 | 28.0 | 0.977 | 24-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -23.34 | 12.17 | 5 | 20.7 | 0.765 | 4-Mar-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -23.31 | 161.81 | 7 | 23.3 | 0.846 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -23.30 | 14.31 | 5 | 14.7 | 0.576 | 21-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -23.23 | 8.00 | 4 | 23.3 | 0.793 | 11-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -23.16 | 12.62 | 5 | 20.2 | 0.718 | 7-Mar-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -23.00 | 12.05 | 5 | 20.2 | 0.771 | 14-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -23.00 | 12.06 | 5 | 20.6 | 0.798 | 22-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -23.00 | 12.58 | 5 | 20.2 | 0.724 | 9-Mar-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -23.00 | 13.61 | 5 | 16.8 | 0.527 | 3-Mar-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -22.97 | 13.95 | 4 | 18.4 | 0.570 | 15-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -22.97 | 14.05 | 5 | 18.9 | 0.656 | 11-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -22.89 | 14.41 | 5 | 23.0 | 0.722 | 13-Feb-2003 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -22.72 | 8.18 | 5 | 17.0 | 0.577 | 20-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -22.34 | 161.44 | 7 | 24.2 | 0.910 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -21.74 | 161.36 | 10 | 24.4 | 0.930 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -19.60 | -38.61 | 5 | 28.9 | 0.972 | 30-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -19.14 | 5.11 | 5 | 17.9 | 0.635 | 19-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -18.11 | 152.10 | 10 | 25.0 | 0.853 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -16.59 | -38.27 | 5 | 28.9 | 0.986 | 31-Mar-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -15.85 | 3.98 | 4 | 24.6 | 0.941 | 9-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -15.14 | 1.76 | 5 | 19.2 | 0.762 | 18-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -13.45 | 143.67 | 7 | 25.0 | 0.694 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -12.39 | 140.34 | 7 | 27.0 | 0.981 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -11.27 | -30.12 | 5 | 28.5 | 0.888 | 6-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -11.20 | 150.91 | 7 | 26.6 | 0.954 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -10.93 | -27.88 | 5 | 28.1 | 0.910 | 7-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -10.90 | -1.71 | 5 | 22.1 | 0.882 | 17-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -10.41 | 0.95 | 4 | 24.3 | 0.910 | 7-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -9.09 | -27.72 | 5 | 28.2 | 0.917 | 8-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -7.98 | -27.64 | 5 | 28.4 | 0.921 | 8-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -6.83 | -27.52 | 5 | 28.4 | 0.925 | 9-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -6.40 | -5.35 | 5 | 23.5 | 0.923 | 16-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -4.70 | 148.04 | 7 | 28.8 | 0.957 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| -3.66 | -25.54 | 5 | 28.7 | 0.973 | 10-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -2.53 | -24.80 | 5 | 29.0 | 0.989 | 10-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -2.06 | -4.48 | 4 | 27.7 | 0.984 | 4-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -2.00 | -5.45 | 4 | 27.5 | 0.991 | 3-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -0.64 | -10.14 | 4 | 28.5 | 0.987 | 2-Feb-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -0.33 | -10.21 | 5 | 24.5 | 0.918 | 14-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| -0.27 | -24.28 | 5 | 28.9 | 0.984 | 11-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 0.35 | -23.86 | 5 | 29.5 | 0.983 | 12-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 1.00 | -22.80 | 5 | 29.4 | 0.980 | 11-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 2.00 | -12.07 | 5 | 26.9 | 0.879 | 14-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 2.72 | -31.71 | 5 | 28.5 | 0.974 | 14-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 3.05 | -15.71 | 4 | 28.8 | 0.989 | 31-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 3.62 | -32.83 | 5 | 28.7 | 0.990 | 14-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 3.84 | -35.74 | 5 | 27.8 | 0.991 | 15-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 4.60 | -18.25 | 4 | 28.3 | 0.989 | 30-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 4.95 | -18.42 | 4 | 28.4 | 0.985 | 30-Jan-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 5.03 | 126.00 | 7 | 29.1 | 0.963 | Jun-Jul 1997 | Bentaleb et al. (2002) | |
| 6.17 | -39.55 | 5 | 27.7 | 0.983 | 16-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 6.45 | -43.94 | 5 | 27.3 | 0.971 | 17-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 6.54 | -15.70 | 5 | 28.3 | 0.984 | 13-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 7.30 | -45.83 | 5 | 27.3 | 0.930 | 17-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 8.50 | -52.63 | 5 | 27.9 | 0.989 | 21-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 10.89 | -54.23 | 5 | 26.5 | 0.978 | 25-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 11.13 | -18.76 | 5 | 28.7 | 0.949 | 12-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 12.07 | -76.51 | 5 | 28.2 | 0.938 | 25-May-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 13.84 | -74.15 | 5 | 27.6 | 0.932 | 26-May-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 14.20 | -63.43 | 5 | 28.0 | 0.984 | 9-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 14.69 | -59.74 | 5 | 28.0 | 0.985 | 10-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 15.01 | -60.70 | 5 | 27.7 | 0.964 | 19-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 15.05 | -61.03 | 5 | 27.8 | 0.972 | 18-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 15.31 | -72.79 | 5 | 27.6 | 0.911 | 27-May-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 15.35 | -59.28 | 5 | 27.8 | 0.981 | 17-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 15.40 | -68.20 | 5 | 27.9 | 0.943 | 7-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 15.52 | -70.24 | 5 | 27.9 | 0.974 | 6-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 15.55 | -65.14 | 5 | 28.2 | 0.986 | 8-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 15.56 | -60.15 | 5 | 28.1 | 0.970 | 16-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 15.84 | -61.05 | 5 | 28.1 | 0.956 | 16-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 16.00 | -55.17 | 5 | 26.4 | 0.914 | 27-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 16.10 | -61.17 | 5 | 28.2 | 0.978 | 12-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 16.54 | -72.21 | 5 | 27.3 | 0.939 | 28-May-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 16.76 | -71.49 | 5 | 28.2 | 0.932 | 5-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 16.95 | -19.94 | 5 | 27.0 | 0.953 | 11-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 17.27 | -71.65 | 5 | 27.6 | 0.961 | 28-May-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 19.58 | -56.08 | 5 | 26.2 | 0.933 | 28-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 21.33 | -74.15 | 5 | 27.0 | 0.949 | 29-May-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 22.75 | -158.00 | 7 | 23.1 | 0.886 | Feb-2003 | Prahl et al. (2005) | |
| 22.75 | -158.00 | 7 | 23.1 | 0.876 | Feb-2004 | Prahl et al. (2005) | |
| 22.75 | -158.00 | 7 | 23.1 | 0.875 | Feb-2005 | Prahl et al. (2005) | |
| 22.75 | -158.00 | 7 | 23.1 | 0.866 | Feb-2006 | Prahl et al. (2005) | |
| 22.75 | -158.00 | 7 | 25.3 | 0.911 | May-2003 | Prahl et al. (2005) | |
| 22.75 | -158.00 | 7 | 25.3 | 0.846 | May-2004 | Prahl et al. (2005) | |
| 22.75 | -158.00 | 7 | 25.3 | 0.904 | May-2005 | Prahl et al. (2005) | |
| 22.75 | -158.00 | 7 | 25.3 | 0.836 | May-2004 | Prahl et al. (2005) | |
| 22.75 | -158.00 | 7 | 25.3 | 0.864 | May-2005 | Prahl et al. (2005) | |
| 23.06 | -79.36 | 5 | 27.6 | 0.950 | 31-May-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 23.66 | -56.67 | 5 | 26.2 | 0.928 | 29-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 24.02 | -80.43 | 5 | 28.2 | 0.956 | 1-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 24.13 | -80.57 | 5 | 28.8 | 0.927 | 1-Jun-2002 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 27.01 | -16.01 | 5 | 22.8 | 0.820 | 8-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 28.02 | -58.17 | 5 | 24.1 | 0.887 | 30-Apr-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 29.00 | 142.87 | 2 | 28.3 | 0.840 | Jul-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 30.38 | 138.65 | 2 | 26.6 | 0.920 | Jul-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 31.24 | -14.51 | 5 | 22.7 | 0.803 | 7-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 31.37 | -59.05 | 5 | 21.1 | 0.722 | 1-May-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 32.47 | 140.52 | 2 | 21.6 | 0.650 | Jun-1996 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 32.87 | -19.29 | 4 | 23.5 | 0.822 | 30-Sep-1990 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 32.90 | -18.94 | 4 | 23.4 | 0.837 | 29-Sep-1990 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 32.97 | 138.25 | 2 | 25.5 | 0.820 | Jul-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 33.56 | -13.85 | 5 | 22.3 | 0.732 | 6-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 34.27 | 142.04 | 2 | 17.8 | 0.620 | Mar-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 34.27 | 142.04 | 2 | 26.4 | 0.890 | Oct-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 34.56 | 139.41 | 2 | 26.2 | 0.870 | Aug-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 34.56 | 139.41 | 2 | 16.9 | 0.580 | Mar-1995 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 34.56 | 139.41 | 2 | 22.2 | 0.760 | Jun-1996 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 34.67 | 138.60 | 2 | 14.2 | 0.460 | Mar-1995 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 34.67 | 140.12 | 2 | 16.9 | 0.550 | Mar-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 34.67 | 140.12 | 2 | 27.4 | 0.920 | Aug-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 34.67 | 140.12 | 2 | 21.0 | 0.710 | Jun-1996 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 34.83 | -24.01 | 5 | 20.2 | 0.677 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 35.00 | 139.33 | 2 | 14.0 | 0.480 | Mar-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 35.00 | 139.33 | 2 | 26.9 | 0.850 | Aug-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 35.00 | 139.33 | 2 | 15.3 | 0.480 | Mar-1995 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 35.00 | 139.33 | 2 | 19.8 | 0.630 | Jun-1996 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 35.11 | -19.24 | 4 | 22.7 | 0.797 | 27-Sep-1990 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 35.13 | -60.04 | 5 | 19.0 | 0.680 | 2-May-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 36.63 | -122.14 | 1 | 13.0 | 0.342 | 17-Jun-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.64 | -122.14 | 1 | 11.5 | 0.311 | 5-Aug-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.65 | -12.93 | 5 | 21.3 | 0.658 | 5-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 36.67 | -21.00 | 5 | 20.6 | 0.680 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 36.73 | -122.06 | 5 | 13.0 | 0.320 | 26-May-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.77 | -122.02 | 5 | 13.4 | 0.356 | 25-May-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.77 | -58.06 | 5 | 21.7 | 0.766 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 36.78 | -122.02 | 1 | 14.3 | 0.309 | 11-Mar-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.78 | -122.02 | 1 | 13.7 | 0.317 | 30-Apr-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.78 | -122.02 | 1 | 11.7 | 0.320 | 17-Jun-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.78 | -122.02 | 1 | 15.9 | 0.360 | 15-Jul-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.78 | -122.02 | 1 | 13.0 | 0.341 | 5-Aug-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.78 | -122.02 | 1 | 14.6 | 0.387 | 9-Sep-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.78 | -122.02 | 1 | 15.8 | 0.418 | 4-Nov-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.78 | -122.02 | 1 | 13.2 | 0.391 | 13-Jan-1993 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.80 | -121.85 | 1 | 14.6 | 0.338 | 11-Mar-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.80 | -121.85 | 1 | 13.7 | 0.341 | 30-Apr-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.80 | -121.85 | 1 | 15.0 | 0.424 | 9-Sep-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.87 | -122.20 | 5 | 15.2 | 0.385 | 2-Apr-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 36.97 | -122.40 | 5 | 14.6 | 0.347 | 29-May-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 37.06 | -122.27 | 3 | 14.1 | 0.387 | 29-Mar-1992 | Bac et al. (2003) | |
| 37.42 | -27.58 | 5 | 19.5 | 0.697 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 38.20 | 143.38 | 2 | 23.7 | 0.810 | Oct-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 38.80 | -19.89 | 4 | 21.6 | 0.693 | 26-Sep-1990 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 38.92 | -20.33 | 5 | 20.1 | 0.656 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 39.54 | -53.74 | 5 | 21.2 | 0.769 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 39.83 | 146.56 | 2 | 23.5 | 0.780 | Oct-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 40.00 | -62.14 | 5 | 16.1 | 0.493 | 3-May-2001 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 40.45 | -31.89 | 5 | 17.2 | 0.594 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 40.47 | 144.41 | 2 | 16.0 | 0.460 | Oct-1994 | Sawada et al. (1998) | |
| 41.13 | -20.71 | 4 | 20.9 | 0.691 | 25-Sep-1990 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 41.48 | -11.40 | 5 | 19.4 | 0.669 | 4-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 41.68 | -19.91 | 5 | 19.3 | 0.516 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 42.16 | -21.46 | 4 | 20.6 | 0.635 | 23-Sep-1990 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 42.46 | -49.01 | 5 | 22.4 | 0.840 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 42.61 | -54.84 | 5 | 22.1 | 0.760 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 42.74 | -55.79 | 5 | 20.3 | 0.656 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 42.80 | 4.73 | 5 | 14.5 | 0.380 | 16-Apr-1997 | Cacho et al. (1999) | |
| 42.80 | 5.03 | 5 | 15.0 | 0.420 | 15-Apr-1997 | Cacho et al. (1999) | |
| 42.89 | -35.66 | 5 | 16.3 | 0.549 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 42.90 | 4.97 | 5 | 14.3 | 0.370 | 14-Apr-1997 | Cacho et al. (1999) | |
| 42.95 | -56.77 | 5 | 20.5 | 0.656 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.00 | -44.17 | 5 | 24.6 | 0.861 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.00 | -41.32 | 5 | 22.8 | 0.726 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.00 | -38.75 | 5 | 22.6 | 0.760 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.00 | -34.53 | 5 | 21.7 | 0.694 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.00 | -33.48 | 5 | 21.7 | 0.730 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.00 | -31.45 | 5 | 21.3 | 0.736 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.00 | -29.38 | 5 | 21.8 | 0.811 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.00 | -25.47 | 5 | 20.9 | 0.729 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.00 | -23.63 | 5 | 20.6 | 0.629 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.01 | -21.79 | 5 | 20.8 | 0.720 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.02 | -46.49 | 5 | 25.3 | 0.826 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 43.42 | 7.86 | 5 | 16.3 | 0.350 | 14-May-1993 | Bentaleb et al. (1999) | |
| 43.42 | 7.86 | 5 | 16.5 | 0.370 | 27-May-1993 | Bentaleb et al. (1999) | |
| 43.42 | 7.86 | 5 | 16.7 | 0.370 | 31-May-1993 | Bentaleb et al. (1999) | |
| 44.23 | -19.83 | 5 | 17.6 | 0.429 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 44.66 | -20.56 | 4 | 18.7 | 0.539 | 22-Sep-1990 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 45.20 | -39.46 | 5 | 14.6 | 0.401 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 45.24 | -44.31 | 5 | 13.7 | 0.360 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 46.03 | -8.80 | 5 | 17.5 | 0.564 | 3-Oct-2000 | Rühlemann and Butzin (2006) | |
| 46.53 | -19.83 | 5 | 16.6 | 0.446 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 46.84 | -20.04 | 4 | 16.9 | 0.462 | 2-Jul-1989 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 47.06 | -19.73 | 4 | 17.4 | 0.443 | 22-Sep-1990 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 47.29 | -8.64 | 5 | 18.2 | 0.557 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 47.63 | -6.66 | 5 | 17.1 | 0.497 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 48.30 | -4.95 | 5 | 17.1 | 0.458 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 49.03 | -4.95 | 5 | 17.1 | 0.463 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 49.54 | -4.46 | 5 | 17.1 | 0.517 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 51.10 | -20.47 | 5 | 14.2 | 0.471 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 53.31 | -20.90 | 5 | 12.8 | 0.387 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 54.80 | -21.11 | 5 | 12.5 | 0.366 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 55.63 | -20.01 | 4 | 14.0 | 0.357 | 25-Jul-1991 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 55.93 | -20.01 | 4 | 13.9 | 0.373 | 25-Jul-1991 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 55.98 | -19.82 | 4 | 11.7 | 0.521 | 25-Jun-1989 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 56.06 | -19.98 | 4 | 13.9 | 0.357 | 25-Jul-1991 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 56.59 | -20.73 | 5 | 12.1 | 0.440 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 57.00 | -166.00 | 5 | 7.6 | 0.220 | 2-Sep-2000 | Shin et al. (2002) | depth 0-5 m |
| 57.50 | -166.00 | 5 | 7.7 | 0.250 | 2-Sep-2000 | Harada et al. (2003) | depth approximately 5 m |
| 58.00 | -166.00 | 5 | 7.0 | 0.130 | 3-Sep-2000 | Harada et al. (2003) | depth approximately 5 m |
| 58.18 | -20.34 | 5 | 11.7 | 0.351 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 58.50 | -166.00 | 5 | 7.7 | 0.170 | 3-Sep-2000 | Shin et al. (2002) | depth 0-5 m |
| 59.41 | -3.83 | 5 | 11.6 | 0.400 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 59.43 | -17.71 | 5 | 11.6 | 0.326 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 59.48 | -167.43 | 5 | 7.9 | 0.140 | 2-Oct-2000 | Harada et al. (2003) | depth approximately 5 m |
| 59.50 | -12.51 | 5 | 11.8 | 0.320 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 59.50 | -7.84 | 5 | 12.0 | 0.379 | Jun-1996 | Conte et al. (2006) | |
| 59.70 | -21.25 | 4 | 10.2 | 0.379 | 15-Jun-1989 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 59.70 | -21.25 | 4 | 10.2 | 0.299 | 15-Jun-1989 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 59.70 | -21.25 | 5 | 10.2 | 0.461 | 15-Jun-1989 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 60.11 | 5.67 | 8 | 7.1 | 0.210 | 25-Apr-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.11 | 5.67 | 8 | 6.5 | 0.210 | 26-Apr-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.11 | 5.67 | 8 | 6.9 | 0.220 | 30-Apr-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.11 | 5.67 | 8 | 7.0 | 0.220 | 5-May-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.11 | 5.67 | 8 | 7.7 | 0.200 | 6-May-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.11 | 5.67 | 8 | 7.8 | 0.200 | 10-May-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.11 | 5.67 | 8 | 7.8 | 0.200 | 14-May-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.11 | 5.67 | 10 | 6.6 | 0.230 | 3-May-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.29 | 5.63 | 10 | 7.5 | 0.230 | 18-May-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.38 | 5.75 | 3 | 7.9 | 0.190 | 14-May-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.38 | 5.75 | 10 | 7.7 | 0.180 | 14-May-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.38 | 5.75 | 10 | 7.2 | 0.240 | 18-May-1992 | Conte et al. (1994) | |
| 60.42 | -14.83 | 5 | 12.5 | 0.399 | 30-Jun-1991 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 60.55 | -20.15 | 4 | 12.3 | 0.426 | 12-Jul-1991 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 60.55 | -19.55 | 4 | 12.6 | 0.446 | 12-Jul-1991 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 60.66 | -3.59 | 6 | 12.9 | 0.390 | 29-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 60.78 | -19.68 | 4 | 13.1 | 0.392 | 14-Jul-1991 | Conte and Eglinton (1993) | |
| 61.55 | -168.98 | 5 | 7.6 | 0.080 | 4-Sep-2000 | Harada et al. (2003) | depth approximately 5 m |
| 62.21 | 3.21 | 6 | 13.2 | 0.430 | 24-Jul-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 62.50 | -168.00 | 5 | 7.5 | 0.070 | 5-Sep-2000 | Shin et al. (2002) | depth 0-5 m |
| 63.08 | -168.30 | 5 | 5.0 | 0.110 | 1-Oct-2000 | Harada et al. (2003) | depth approximately 5 m |
| 63.50 | -164.00 | 5 | 9.7 | 0.250 | 5-Sep-2000 | Shin et al. (2002) | depth 0-5 m |
| 64.18 | 5.40 | 6 | 12.7 | 0.350 | 25-Jul-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 65.09 | -9.41 | 6 | 8.8 | 0.140 | 28-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 65.98 | 8.89 | 6 | 11.9 | 0.280 | 26-Jul-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 66.70 | -18.37 | 6 | 7.2 | 0.210 | 26-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 66.87 | -17.39 | 6 | 8.5 | 0.250 | 22-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 67.48 | -21.51 | 6 | 6.1 | 0.180 | 23-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 67.52 | -12.09 | 6 | 9.1 | 0.200 | 27-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 67.55 | -17.12 | 6 | 7.6 | 0.200 | 26-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 67.79 | 7.75 | 6 | 10.6 | 0.280 | 28-Jul-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 67.88 | -21.32 | 6 | 7.0 | 0.140 | 26-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 67.90 | 6.74 | 6 | 11.0 | 0.360 | 27-Jul-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 68.20 | 6.38 | 6 | 10.9 | 0.340 | 27-Jul-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 69.23 | -12.67 | 6 | 6.8 | 0.190 | 21-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 69.40 | 5.50 | 6 | 10.1 | 0.360 | 28-Jul-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 69.58 | 4.55 | 6 | 9.6 | 0.230 | 28-Jul-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 69.81 | -19.39 | 6 | 0.8 | 0.240 | 25-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 69.94 | 7.10 | 6 | 10.0 | 0.300 | 5-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 70.79 | 2.72 | 6 | 9.3 | 0.250 | 29-Jul-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 71.14 | 2.15 | 6 | 9.3 | 0.190 | 29-Jul-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 71.25 | -9.60 | 6 | 6.4 | 0.130 | 20-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 72.43 | -15.53 | 6 | 1.8 | 0.180 | 24-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 72.56 | -0.40 | 6 | 6.6 | 0.190 | 30-Jul-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 74.50 | 5.37 | 6 | 7.3 | 0.360 | 8-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 74.67 | 10.50 | 6 | 7.5 | 0.300 | 6-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 76.03 | -9.24 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.120 | 2-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 76.03 | -7.64 | 6 | -0.6 | 0.200 | 10-Aug-2000 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 76.37 | -10.46 | 6 | 2.1 | 0.160 | 2-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 78.71 | 9.05 | 6 | 7.0 | 0.260 | 15-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 78.83 | 8.72 | 6 | 7.1 | 0.220 | 15-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 78.88 | 1.77 | 6 | 1.8 | 0.150 | 14-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 79.87 | 1.03 | 6 | 2.1 | 0.170 | 13-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) | |
| 80.42 | 5.55 | 6 | 4.9 | 0.200 | 10-Aug-1999 | Bendle and Rosell-Melé (2004) |