Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Kemp, E M; Hayes, Dennis E; Frakes, Lawrence A (2005): Pollen and spore abundance of Hole 28-270 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.250230

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Webb, Peter-Noel; Wall, Robert E; Piper, David J W; McCollum, D W; Kemp, E M; Kaneps, Ansis G; Ford, Arthur B; Chen, Pei-Hsin; Burns, Derek A; Barrett, Peter J; Hayes, Dennis E; Frakes, Lawrence A (1975): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XXVIII, 999 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.28.1975
Further details:
Paleontology data base - background and methods. hdl:10013/epic.32352.d001
Project(s):
Coverage:
Latitude: -77.441300 * Longitude: -178.503200
Date/Time Start: 1973-01-29T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1973-01-29T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 121.65 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 385.60 m
Event(s):
28-270 * Latitude: -77.441300 * Longitude: -178.503200 * Date/Time: 1973-01-29T00:00:00 * Elevation: -633.0 m * Penetration: 422.5 m * Recovery: 256.3 m * Location: Antarctic Ocean * Campaign: Leg28 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 45 cores; 398.5 m cored; 10 m drilled; 64.3 % recovery
Comment:
Relative abundance: D = dominant, A = abundant, C = common, F = few, R = rare, T = trace, P = present (numerical values are abundance in percent)
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1DEPTH, sediment/rockDepth sedmGeocode
2Sample code/labelSample labelKemp, E MDSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3Alisporites sp.Alisporites sp.Kemp, E MAbundance estimate
4Cyathidites sp.Cyathidites sp.Kemp, E MAbundance estimate
5Dacrydiumites lawsoniiD. lawsoniiKemp, E MAbundance estimate
6Gleicheniidites circiniditesG. circiniditesKemp, E MAbundance estimate
7Laevigatosporites majorL. majorKemp, E MAbundance estimate
8Lygistepollenites floriniiL. floriniiKemp, E MAbundance estimate
9Microcachryidites antarcticusM. antarcticusKemp, E MAbundance estimate
10Myrtaceidites sp.Myrtaceidites sp.Kemp, E MAbundance estimate
11Nothofagidites brassiN. brassiKemp, E MAbundance estimate
12Nothofagidites fuscaN. fuscaKemp, E MAbundance estimate
13Nothofagidites heteraN. heteraKemp, E MAbundance estimateSpecies questionable
14Nothofagidites menziesiiN. menziesiiKemp, E MAbundance estimate
15Nothofagidites vansteeniN. vansteeniKemp, E MAbundance estimateSpecies questionable
16Nothofagidites cinctaN. cinctaKemp, E MAbundance estimateSpecies questionable
17Podocarpidites sp.Podocarpidites sp.Kemp, E MAbundance estimate
18Podosporites microsaccatusP. microsaccatusKemp, E MAbundance estimate
19Proteacidites sp.Proteacidites sp.Kemp, E MAbundance estimate
20Proteacidites minimusP. minimusKemp, E MAbundance estimate
21Proteacidites pseudomoidesP. pseudomoidesKemp, E MAbundance estimateSpecies questionable
22Proteacidites subscabratusP. subscabratusKemp, E MAbundance estimate
23Stereisporites antiquasporitesS. antiquasporitesKemp, E MAbundance estimate
24Tricolpites sp.Tricolpites sp.Kemp, E MAbundance estimate
25Tricolpites fissilisT. fissilisKemp, E MAbundance estimate
26Tricolpites matauraensisT. matauraensisKemp, E MAbundance estimateSpecies questionable
27Tricopopollenites sp.Tricopopollenites sp.Kemp, E MAbundance estimate
Size:
111 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML