/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Ruddiman, William F; Kidd, Robert B (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 94-611A. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231241 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Weaver, Philip PE; Unsöld, Gerhard; Kidd, Robert B; Thomas, Ellen; Takayama, Toshiaki; Salehipour, Sassan A; Robinson, Frank; Philipps, I; Mitchell, Margie; Keigwin, Lloyd D; Hill, Philip R; Eggers, Margaret R; Dolan, James F; Clement, Bradford M; Baldauf, Jack G; Ruddiman, William F (1987): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XCIV, 613 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.94.1987 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: 52.841200 * LONGITUDE: -30.309700 DATE/TIME START: 1983-08-06T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1983-08-06T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 3.80 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 118.07 m Event(s): 94-611A * LATITUDE: 52.841200 * LONGITUDE: -30.309700 * DATE/TIME: 1983-08-06T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -3201.0 m * Penetration: 132 m * Recovery: 100.8 m * LOCATION: North Atlantic/RIDGE * CAMPAIGN: Leg94 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.94.1987) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 13 cores; 122.4 m cored; 9.6 m drilled; 82.3 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Carbonates [%] (Carb) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Radiolarians [%] (Rad) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Diatoms [%] (Diatoms) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silicoflagellates [%] (Silicoflag) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Spiculae [%] (Spiculae) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Minerals, other [%] (Min other) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Quartz [%] (Qz) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Feldspar [%] (Fsp) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Mica [%] (Mica) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Clay minerals [%] (Clay min) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Pyrite, FeS2 [%] (Py) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Heavy minerals [%] (HM) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Volcanic glass [%] (Volc glass) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Micronodules [%] (Micronod) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 330 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Lithology Comment Carb [%] Nannos [%] Foram [%] Rad [%] Diatoms [%] Silicoflag [%] Spiculae [%] Min other [%] Qz [%] Fsp [%] Mica [%] Clay min [%] Py [%] HM [%] Volc glass [%] Micronod [%] 3.80 94-611A-1-3,80 0 0 0 SILICEOUS FORAM NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 60 10 0 2 0 8 0 18 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6.78 94-611A-1-5,78 25 45 30 CALCAREOUS MUD Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 42 5 0 30 0 5 3 0 22.30 94-611A-3-41,100 0 0 0 SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE numerical abundance 0 56 7 2 1 0 7 0 25 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 43.92 94-611A-5-6,42 0 0 0 SILICEOUS NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 59 10 0 2 0 8 0 15 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 46.20 94-611A-6-1,60 5 45 50 CALCAREOUS MUD numerical abundance 0 27 2 3 1 1 8 0 56 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 60.40 94-611A-7-4,70 0 0 0 MARLY FORAM NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 41 10 1 2 1 5 0 24 5 1 5 0 5 0 0 66.20 94-611A-8-11,140 15 25 60 CALCAREOUS MUD Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 1 20 8 0 0 0 1 20 39 0 0 0 0 4 6 1 69.24 94-611A-8-31,144 0 0 0 MARLY NANNO OOZE numerical abundance 1 55 6 0 2 0 1 5 29 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 84.75 94-611A-10-1,75 15 30 55 CALCAREOUS MUD numerical abundance 3 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 63 1 0 20 0 0 3 1 89.41 94-611A-10-4,91 5 20 75 CALCAREOUS MUD numerical abundance 1 10 3 0 3 0 1 0 51 1 0 30 0 0 0 0 94.35 94-611A-11-1,75 10 25 65 CALCAREOUS MUD numerical abundance 3 6 3 0 1 0 1 0 62 1 0 20 0 3 0 0 97.07 94-611A-11-3,47 10 20 70 CALCAREOUS MUD numerical abundance 1 20 8 1 8 1 1 0 32 0 0 25 0 3 3 0 106.60 94-611A-12-3,40 20 35 45 MUD numerical abundance 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 1 0 25 0 4 7 1 108.30 94-611A-12-4,60 0 0 0 MARLY FORAM NANNO OOZE numerical abundance 1 43 4 1 7 1 1 0 24 1 0 14 0 3 0 0 118.07 94-611A-13-4,77 5 15 80 CALCAREOUS MUD numerical abundance 1 19 2 1 5 0 1 0 36 0 0 29 3 1 0 1