/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Leinen, Margaret W; Rea, David K (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 92-601. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231214 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Stephen, Ralph A; Romine, Karen; Pearce, Julian A; Owen, Robert M; Nishitani, Tadashi; Newmark, Robin L; Moos, Daniel; Lyle, Mitchell W; Knüttel, Stephen; Kastner, Miriam; Hobart, Michael A; Goldsborough, Robert; Goldfarb, Marjorie; Goldberg, David; Gieskes, Joris M; Erzinger, Jörg; Boulègue, Jacques; Becker, Keir; Anderson, Roger N; Leinen, Margaret W; Rea, David K (1986): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XCII, 617 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.92.1986 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: -18.920300 * LONGITUDE: -116.868500 DATE/TIME START: 1983-03-25T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1983-03-25T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.75 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 20.45 m Event(s): 92-601 * LATITUDE: -18.920300 * LONGITUDE: -116.868500 * DATE/TIME: 1983-03-25T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -3433.0 m * Penetration: 20.4 m * Recovery: 19.3 m * LOCATION: South Pacific/CONT RISE * CAMPAIGN: Leg92 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.92.1986) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 3 cores; 20.4 m cored; 0 m drilled; 94.8 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Clay minerals [%] (Clay min) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Opaque minerals [%] (Opaque) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Iron [%] (Fe) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Volcanic glass [%] (Volc glass) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Palagonite [%] (Palagonite) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Micronodules [%] (Micronod) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 404 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Nannos [%] Foram [%] Clay min [%] Opaque [%] Fe [%] Volc glass [%] Palagonite [%] Micronod [%] 0.75 92-601-1-1,75 0 0 0 Pleistocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 85 2 10 1 0 1 1 0 2.25 92-601-1-2,75 2 88 10 Pleistocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 85 2 10 0 1 1 1 0 3.75 92-601-1-3,75 2 88 10 Pleistocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 84 2 10 1 0 1 1 1 5.25 92-601-1-4,75 0 0 0 Pleistocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 84 6 6 1 0 1 2 0 6.25 92-601-1-5,25 0 50 50 Pleistocene NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 0 1 7 0 0 1 0 1 7.30 92-601-1-51,130 3 85 12 Pleistocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 83 2 12 1 0 0 1 1 7.65 92-601-1-6,15 0 0 0 Pleistocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 77 1 20 0 0 1 0 1 8.15 92-601-1-6,65 0 0 0 Pleistocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 77 2 22 1 0 1 1 1 9.04 92-601-1-7,4 3 39 58 Lower pliocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Minor lithology; numerical abundance 74 4 18 0 0 2 0 2 9.30 92-601-1-7,30 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 79 3 15 1 0 1 1 0 9.53 92-601-1-CC,15 5 70 25 Lower pliocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 69 2 22 2 1 1 2 1 10.35 92-601-2-1,75 5 70 25 Lower pliocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 69 2 25 2 0 0 1 1 11.85 92-601-2-2,75 5 70 25 Lower pliocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 68 2 25 2 0 0 2 1 13.35 92-601-2-3,75 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 68 1 25 2 1 1 2 0 13.85 92-601-2-31,125 5 70 25 Lower pliocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 70 2 25 1 0 0 1 1 14.72 92-601-2-4,62 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Minor lithology; numerical abundance 81 1 15 1 0 1 1 0 14.90 92-601-2-4,80 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAY BEARING NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 76 3 17 1 0 1 2 0 16.35 92-601-2-5,75 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 66 1 30 1 0 1 1 0 16.77 92-601-2-51,117 5 65 30 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 63 1 30 2 0 1 2 1 17.58 92-601-2-6,48 5 65 30 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 64 2 30 1 0 1 2 0 17.82 92-601-2-6,72 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE Minor lithology; numerical abundance 58 1 36 1 0 1 2 1 18.23 92-601-2-CC,0 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 60 2 35 1 0 1 1 0 19.57 92-601-3-1,17 5 63 32 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 59 3 31 3 0 1 2 1 19.72 92-601-3-1,32 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 58 1 39 0 0 1 1 0 19.87 92-601-3-1,47 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 57 2 34 3 1 0 2 0 20.25 92-601-3-1,85 0 0 0 Lower pliocene CLAYEY NANNO CHALK Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 52 5 39 1 0 1 2 0 20.45 92-601-3-CC,0 5 63 32 CLAYEY NANNO CHALK Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 55 2 29 2 1 7 3 1