Citation:

PANGAEA.231204

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

Adair, Richard G; Burnett, Mark S; Jordan, Thomas H; Kim, Isaac; Lerner-Lam, Arthur; Menard, H William; Mills, William; Natland, J; Orcutt, John A; Prévöt, Richard; Riedesel, Mark A; Ritzwoller, Michael H; Rosencrantz, Eric J; Shaw, Peter R; Shearer, Peter M; Smith, Deborah K; Toy, Kenneth M; Van Bruggen, C; Whitmarsh, Robert B; Willoughby, David F (1987): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XCI, 494 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.91.1987

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -23.853300 * Longitude: -165.654500

Date/Time Start: 1983-02-12T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1983-02-12T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 25.35 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 33.00 m

Event(s):

91-596B * Latitude: -23.853300 * Longitude: -165.654500 * Date/Time: 1983-02-12T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5701.0 m * Penetration: 34.3 m * Recovery: 9 m * Location: South Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 1 cores; 9.6 m cored; 0 m drilled; 94 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

78 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Rad [%]	9 Fsp [%]	10 Zeo [%]	11 Clay min [%]	12 Opaque [%]	13 Fe [%]	14 Micronod [%]
25.35	91-596B-1-1,65	2	98	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	2	0	20	38	30	7	3
26.90	91-596B-1-2,70	2	98	PELAGIC CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	2	0	7	82	3	8	0
28.40	91-596B-1-3,70	0	100	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	1	2	2	55	35	5	2
29.90	91-596B-1-4,70	0	100	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	3	55	35	5	2
31.40	91-596B-1-5,70	0	100	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	5	50	35	7	3
33.00	91-596B-1-6,80	0	100	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	1	0	15	40	36	5	3