Citation:

PANGAEA.231202

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS Citation BibTeX Citation Text Citation Facebook TwitterShow Map Google Earth

Related to:

Adair, Richard G; Burnett, Mark S; Jordan, Thomas H; Kim, Isaac; Lerner-Lam, Arthur; Menard, H William; Mills, William; Natland, J; Orcutt, John A; Prévöt, Richard; Riedesel, Mark A; Ritzwoller, Michael H; Rosencrantz, Eric J; Shaw, Peter R; Shearer, Peter M; Smith, Deborah K; Toy, Kenneth M; Van Bruggen, C; Whitmarsh, Robert B; Willoughby, David F (1987): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, XCI, 494 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.91.1987

DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM

Further details:

Processed smear slide data base - background and methods

Project(s):

Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)

Coverage:

Latitude: -23.853300 * Longitude: -165.654500

Date/Time Start: 1983-02-12T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1983-02-12T00:00:00

Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.01 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 59.10 m

Event(s):

91-596 * Latitude: -23.853300 * Longitude: -165.654500 * Date/Time: 1983-02-12T00:00:00 * Elevation: -5701.0 m * Penetration: 76.1 m * Recovery: 41.3 m * Location: South Pacific * Campaign: * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 8 cores; 66.5 m cored; 9.6 m drilled; 62.1 % recovery

Parameter(s):

#	Name	Short Name	Unit	Method/Device	Comment
1	DEPTH, sediment/rock	Depth sed	m		Geocode
2	Sample code/label	Sample label		DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3	Sand	Sand	%	Smear slide analysis
4	Silt	Silt	%	Smear slide analysis
5	Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay	<2 µm	%	Smear slide analysis
6	Lithology/composition/facies	Lithology		Smear slide analysis
7	Comment	Comment		Smear slide analysis
8	Foraminifera	Foram	%	Smear slide analysis
9	Radiolarians	Rad	%	Smear slide analysis
10	Spiculae	Spiculae	%	Smear slide analysis
11	Quartz	Qz	%	Smear slide analysis
12	Feldspar	Fsp	%	Smear slide analysis
13	Zeolite	Zeo	%	Smear slide analysis
14	Clay minerals	Clay min	%	Smear slide analysis
15	Opaque minerals	Opaque	%	Smear slide analysis
16	Pyrite, FeS2	Py	%	Smear slide analysis
17	Iron	Fe	%	Smear slide analysis
18	Micronodules	Micronod	%	Smear slide analysis

License:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)

Size:

680 data points

Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

1 Depth sed [m]	2 Sample label	4 Silt [%]	5 <2 µm [%]	6 Lithology	7 Comment	8 Foram [%]	9 Rad [%]	10 Spiculae [%]	11 Qz [%]	12 Fsp [%]	13 Zeo [%]	14 Clay min [%]	15 Opaque [%]	16 Py [%]	17 Fe [%]	18 Micronod [%]
1.01	91-596-1-11,101	0	100	PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	2	0	2	2	83	10	0	2	1
2.10	91-596-1-2,60	0	100	PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	2	92	5	0	2	2
2.70	91-596-1-21,120	0	100	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	25	60	12	0	1	2
3.50	91-596-1-3,50	2	98	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	1	15	71	10	0	2	1
4.00	91-596-1-31,100	0	100	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	20	65	12	0	3	0
5.00	91-596-1-4,50	0	100	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	1	25	58	15	0	1	2
5.55	91-596-1-41,105	1	99	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	25	58	15	0	2	0
5.71	91-596-1-41,121	1	99	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	1	30	59	8	0	2	0
5.75	91-596-1-41,125	1	99	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	20	70	7	0	3	2
6.20	91-596-2-1,70	2	98	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	26	50	20	0	3	1
6.30	91-596-1-CC,0	0	0	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	20	70	8	0	2	2
7.70	91-596-2-2,70	0	100	ZEOLITIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	2	2	22	50	25	0	3	0
9.20	91-596-2-3,70	2	98	ZEOL PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	36	40	20	0	4	2
10.70	91-596-2-4,70	20	80	ZEOL PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	2	30	40	25	0	2	1
11.55	91-596-2-5,5	15	85	ZEOL PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	0	1	30	36	30	0	2	1
12.20	91-596-2-5,70	10	90	METALIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	5	23	60	0	10	2
13.70	91-596-2-6,70	5	95	METALIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	5	28	55	0	10	2
16.27	91-596-3-11,117	2	98	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	0	2	5	31	55	0	7	2
17.30	91-596-3-2,70	1	99	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	0	0	8	32	50	0	8	2
18.80	91-596-3-3,70	2	98	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	15	27	45	0	9	4
18.85	91-596-3-3,75	0	0	ZEOLITIC PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	20	55	10	0	15	1
20.30	91-596-3-4,70	2	98	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	0	0	20	35	40	0	3	2
21.80	91-596-3-5,70	2	98	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	0	0	0	0	20	37	35	0	5	3
23.30	91-596-3-6,70	2	98	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	20	37	35	0	5	3
36.94	91-596-5-21,114	5	95	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	25	34	30	0	8	3
37.78	91-596-5-3,48	0	100	PELAGIC CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	0	0	3	93	2	0	2	2
37.80	91-596-5-3,50	0	100	PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	2	75	15	2	3	3
37.80	91-596-5-3,50	0	100	PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Minor lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	5	75	15	0	5	0
37.81	91-596-5-3,51	0	100	PELAGIC CLAY W/OP OX	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	0	0	3	65	20	0	7	5
37.92	91-596-5-3,62	0	100	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; numerical abundance	0	0	0	0	0	20	45	30	0	2	3
38.72	91-596-5-31,142	0	100	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	0	0	0	2	0	55	35	0	7	3
38.74	91-596-5-31,144	0	100	PELAGIC CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	0	2	0	90	5	0	5	0
39.71	91-596-5-4,91	5	95	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	0	0	0	48	41	0	7	4
39.74	91-596-5-4,94	0	100	RADIOLARIAN PELAGIC CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	10	0	0	0	0	83	2	0	5	2
39.85	91-596-6-1,5	0	100	PELAGIC CLAY	Minor lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	0	0	5	85	3	0	5	2
40.76	91-596-6-1,96	0	100	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	2	0	0	0	5	47	40	0	5	3
43.50	91-596-6-3,70	5	95	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	0	2	15	40	35	0	7	3
46.86	91-596-6-51,106	2	98	ZEOL METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	2	2	0	0	2	15	40	35	0	7	3
49.50	91-596-7-CC,0	0	100	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	2	0	0	0	10	40	38	0	2	10
59.10	91-596-8-CC,0	2	98	METALLIFEROUS PELAGIC CLAY	Dominat lithology; relative abundance	0	3	0	0	2	2	33	45	0	7	10