Hays, James D; Cook, Harry E III (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 9-84 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231182
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Orr, W N; Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Fuller, J T; Cook, F M; Jenkins, D Graham; Cook, Harry E III; Hays, J D (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IX, 1205 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972
Further details:
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 5.748700 * Longitude: -82.888200
Date/Time Start: 1970-01-23T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-01-23T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.02 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 28.43 m
Event(s):
9-84 * Latitude: 5.748700 * Longitude: -82.888200 * Date/Time: 1970-01-23T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3096.0 m * Penetration: 253.9 m * Recovery: 213.3 m * Location: North Pacific * Campaign: Leg9 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 30 cores; 253.8 m cored; 0 m drilled; 84 % recovery
Parameter(s):
| # | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
| 2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
| 3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
| 9 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 10 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 11 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 12 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 13 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 14 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 15 | Hornblende | Hbl | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 16 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 17 | Palagonite | Palagonite | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
| 18 | Fragments | Fragm | % | Smear slide analysis | calcareous material |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
68 data points
Data
| 1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Nannos [%] | 10 Foram [%] | 11 Qz [%] | 12 Fsp [%] | 13 Glt [%] | 14 Fe [%] | 15 Hbl [%] | 16 Volc glass [%] | 17 Palagonite [%] | 18 Fragm [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.02 | 9-84-1-1,74 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | GLAUCONITIC RAD DIATOM FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 50 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 4.28 | 9-84-1-31,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | VOLCANIC FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 45 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| 14.95 | 9-84-2-41,125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | RAD GLAUCONITIC NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 60 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 28.43 | 9-84-4-1,75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | RAD DIATOM GLAUCONITE VOLCANIC NANNO OOZE TO CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 50 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |