/* DATA DESCRIPTION: Citation: Hays, James D; Cook, Harry E III (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 9-83. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231180 Related to: DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM Orr, W N; Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Fuller, J T; Cook, F M; Jenkins, D Graham; Cook, Harry E III; Hays, J D (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IX, 1205 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972 Further details: Processed smear slide data base - background and methods (URI: hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001) Project(s): Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) (URI: http://www.deepseadrilling.org/) Coverage: LATITUDE: 4.046700 * LONGITUDE: -95.737500 DATE/TIME START: 1970-01-17T00:00:00 * DATE/TIME END: 1970-01-17T00:00:00 MINIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1.10 m * MAXIMUM DEPTH, sediment/rock: 241.60 m Event(s): 9-83 * LATITUDE: 4.046700 * LONGITUDE: -95.737500 * DATE/TIME: 1970-01-17T00:00:00 * ELEVATION: -3646.0 m * Penetration: 241.5 m * Recovery: 47 m * LOCATION: North Pacific * CAMPAIGN: Leg9 (URI: https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972) * BASIS: Glomar Challenger (URI: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/glomar.html) * METHOD/DEVICE: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * COMMENT: 8 cores; 59.3 m cored; 0 m drilled; 79.2 % recovery Parameter(s): DEPTH, sediment/rock [m] (Depth sed) * GEOCODE Sample code/label (Sample label) * METHOD/DEVICE: DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation (URI: hdl:10013/epic.27914.d001) Sand [%] (Sand) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Silt [%] (Silt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay [%] (<2 µm) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Stratigraphy (Stratigraphy) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Lithology/composition/facies (Lithology) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Comment (Comment) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Nannofossils [%] (Nannos) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Foraminifera [%] (Foram) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Radiolarians [%] (Rad) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Quartz [%] (Qz) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Clay minerals [%] (Clay min) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Glauconite [%] (Glt) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Iron [%] (Fe) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Volcanic glass [%] (Volc glass) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis Palagonite [%] (Palagonite) * METHOD/DEVICE: Smear slide analysis License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0) (URI: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) Size: 63 data points */ Depth sed [m] Sample label Sand [%] Silt [%] <2 µm [%] Stratigraphy Lithology Comment Nannos [%] Foram [%] Rad [%] Qz [%] Clay min [%] Glt [%] Fe [%] Volc glass [%] Palagonite [%] 1.10 9-83-1-1,80 35 35 60 Pleistocene FORAM RAD CLAY NANNO OOZE Dominat lithology; relative abundance 35 18 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 4.90 9-83-1-4,10 35 35 60 Pleistocene FORAM RAD NANNO CHALK Dominat lithology; relative abundance 65 18 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 222.50 9-83-7-1,70 60 60 60 Middle miocene RAD DIAT NANNO CHALK OOZE Dominat lithology; numerical abundance 45 10 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 241.60 9-83-9-CC,0 0 0 0 CLAY NANNO CHALK Dominat lithology; relative abundance 90 5 2 2 0 0 8 0 0