Hays, James D; Cook, Harry E III (2005): Smear slide analysis of Hole 9-82 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.231179
Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.
Related to:
DSDP (1989): Data from the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Sediment, hard rock and reference files. National Geophysical Data Center, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1, CD-ROM
Orr, W N; Milow, E Dean; Goll, Robert M; Fuller, J T; Cook, F M; Jenkins, D Graham; Cook, Harry E III; Hays, J D (1972): Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, U.S. Government Printing Office, IX, 1205 pp, https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.9.1972
Further details:
Processed smear slide data base - background and methods. hdl:10013/epic.32353.d001
Project(s):
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP)
Coverage:
Latitude: 2.591300 * Longitude: -106.942000
Date/Time Start: 1970-01-13T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1970-01-13T00:00:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.38 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 203.00 m
Event(s):
9-82 * Latitude: 2.591300 * Longitude: -106.942000 * Date/Time: 1970-01-13T00:00:00 * Elevation: -3707.0 m * Penetration: 223.3 m * Recovery: 45.8 m * Location: North Pacific/HILL * Campaign: Leg9 * Basis: Glomar Challenger * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 7 cores; 55.3 m cored; 0 m drilled; 82.8 % recovery
Parameter(s):
# | Name | Short Name | Unit | Principal Investigator | Method/Device | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DEPTH, sediment/rock | Depth sed | m | Geocode | ||
2 | Sample code/label | Sample label | DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation | |||
3 | Sand | Sand | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
4 | Silt | Silt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
5 | Size fraction < 0.002 mm, clay | <2 µm | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
6 | Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy | Smear slide analysis | |||
7 | Lithology/composition/facies | Lithology | Smear slide analysis | |||
8 | Comment | Comment | Smear slide analysis | |||
9 | Nannofossils | Nannos | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
10 | Foraminifera | Foram | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
11 | Radiolarians | Rad | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
12 | Quartz | Qz | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
13 | Feldspar | Fsp | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
14 | Clay minerals | Clay min | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
15 | Glauconite | Glt | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
16 | Iron | Fe | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
17 | Volcanic glass | Volc glass | % | Smear slide analysis | ||
18 | Manganese | Mn | % | Smear slide analysis |
License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-3.0)
Size:
321 data points
Data
1 Depth sed [m] | 2 Sample label | 3 Sand [%] | 4 Silt [%] | 5 <2 µm [%] | 6 Stratigraphy | 7 Lithology | 8 Comment | 9 Nannos [%] | 10 Foram [%] | 11 Rad [%] | 12 Qz [%] | 13 Fsp [%] | 14 Clay min [%] | 15 Glt [%] | 16 Fe [%] | 17 Volc glass [%] | 18 Mn [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.38 | 9-82-1-1,10 | 60 | 60 | 35 | Pleistocene | CLAY RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 25 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.48 | 9-82-1-1,20 | 60 | 60 | 35 | Pleistocene | RAD NANNO FORAM CLAY OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 20 | 30 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.55 | 9-82-1-1,27 | 35 | 35 | 60 | Pleistocene | RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 60 | 23 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.63 | 9-82-1-1,35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 50 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.68 | 9-82-1-1,40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Pleistocene | FORAM RAD DIAT NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1.75 | 9-82-1-11,147 | 35 | 35 | 60 | Pleistocene | RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 40 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5.53 | 9-82-1-4,75 | 60 | 60 | 60 | Pleistocene | RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 50 | 35 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8.53 | 9-82-1-6,75 | 60 | 60 | 35 | Pleistocene | RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 43 | 45 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9.38 | 9-82-1-CC,0 | 35 | 35 | 60 | RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 50 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
69.58 | 9-82-2-1,50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower pliocene | FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 65 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
69.83 | 9-82-2-1,75 | 35 | 35 | 35 | Lower pliocene | FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
70.08 | 9-82-2-11,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Lower pliocene | FORAM RAD NANNO OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 30 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
70.33 | 9-82-2-11,125 | 35 | 35 | 35 | Lower pliocene | FORAM RAD NANNO CHALK OOZE | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
75.75 | 9-82-2-5,67 | 60 | 60 | 60 | Lower pliocene | RAD FORAM NANNO OOZE CHALK | Dominat lithology; relative abundance | 50 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
144.39 | 9-82-3-61,130 | 35 | 35 | 35 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNO DIAT RAD OOZE | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 55 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
192.35 | 9-82-4-1,75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Upper miocene | numerical abundance | 50 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
202.65 | 9-82-5-2,65 | 35 | 35 | 35 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 50 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
202.75 | 9-82-5-2,75 | 35 | 35 | 35 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNO RAD OOZE CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 35 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
203.00 | 9-82-5-21,100 | 60 | 60 | 60 | Upper miocene | FORAM NANNO RAD DIAT OOZE CHALK | Dominat lithology; numerical abundance | 35 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |